Patrick A. LeeEdit

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Patrick A. Lee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Damiens.rf 20:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Angela DavisEdit

Please find and restore the criticism section in Angela Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). It's in the history of the article, if you look for it. I don't think Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn knew anything about Angela Davis or studied her, but in the absence of any better criticism it will serve. Fred Talk 00:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Aristotle PhysicsEdit

I made a few changes to your otherwise excellent article on the Physics. I hope you don't mind - mainly cosmetic. Peter Damian (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

UmmEdit

I'm not sure why you blanked the talk page of the article... Could you explain? Netalarmtalk 00:18, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Next time could you use the Move button at the top of the article? It'll automatically move the article and the related talk page to the new location while leaving behind a redirect. Thanks. I've also removed the warnings. Happy editing! Netalarmtalk 00:25, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Are you sure it's suppose to be an a there instead of an o? Netalarmtalk 00:39, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
I'll look into that, but regarding your first switch, there seems to be some ambiguity. Although the image of the cover says New Atlantis, this, and this (which is redirected from New Atlantis to The New Atlantis] both suggest that the The is part of the title. Netalarmtalk 00:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

How to move: Rename one of the articles to "Temp", move the other article, and then move "Temp" back to its new name. (Redirect to new name and then mark "Temp" with CSD. Netalarmtalk 01:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

MoveEdit

Ok, I'll finish the move. Where are the articles, if they are not in their original locations? Netalarmtalk 01:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

 Y Done. You might want to go over the articles and change Solomon to Salomon. Thanks! Netalarmtalk 02:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

History of Science (Aristotelian physics)Edit

The pseudo Aristotelian Mechanics is about machines and only has 3 articles linking to it, as opposed to 127 various links for Aristotelian physics. I've renamed it History of Science (Aristotelian physics) because it wouldn't let me reverse the name change. But I've taken back the redirect which merely pointed to a list of Aristotle's works. I've read the talk page history, wow... I hope you'll come back to the article and help improve it, if you have the time. Yours sincerely—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Wimshurst machineEdit

This explanation is much better, good work. A13ean (talk) 19:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brian David Ellis for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian David Ellis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian David Ellis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bill william comptonTalk 13:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Ozsváth–Schücking metricEdit

I noticed your comments on the Ozsváth–Schücking metric article. I hope my recent edits have clarified the issues you raised. Teply (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

John FinnisEdit

JKeck, you commented on the talk page of the John Finnis article back in July of this year. I have responded. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions for Editing Spam (food) pageEdit

Hello my name is Kathy! I am a part of a project group consisting of three other members (Linda, Maggie, Tiffany). We are from Cornell University, and intend to edit the Spam (food) page as a class assignment for INFO 3460. I noticed your comment regarding the history section as well as the Grade of meat used on the Spam (food) Talk page. My group members and I have proposed a list of changes to the article on the Spam (food) talk page along with a list of potential sources, we would really value your feedback and ideas, especially in regards to the history of Spam. For instance, how do you envision the History section of the Spam page to look like? Should a separate section be created? If this is the case how should the information on International Usage be presented? If you have any specific sources, advice, or know of other Wikipedians who can help that would be greatly appreciated. Any and all constructive criticism is welcome. Please respond on my Talk page if you can, Thanks!KathyQX94 (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Aristotle's PhysicsEdit

Hello JKeck. It's eight years late but I have answered your question at Talk:Physics_(Aristotle)#Online_versions_of_the_Hardie-Gaye_translationBlanchette (talk) 05:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, JKeck. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, JKeck. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, JKeck. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)