Hinckleycoldstorage

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hinckleycoldstorage (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hinckleycoldstorage/sandbox/Hinckleycoldstorage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Hinckleycoldstorage/sandbox/Hinckleycoldstorage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Hinckleycoldstorage! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello. Your editing behaviour is not in question here, just your username. I did not realise this organisation name was lifted from a film which I now realise. It is also the name of a film review website however that site doesn't appear to have been updated since 2009. That being said, it still gives the impression that your account is representative of being on behalf of an organisation. I will unblock your account, however if you wish to proceed with your change of username you may following the information provided at Changing username. Thanks for your explanation and I wish you all the best at Wikipedia. -- Longhair\^talk 00:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Longhair: Hey I never replied here cause it took me a while to figure out how to properly do that, but now that I'm a bit more familiar with Wikipedia, I just wanted to follow-up here and thank you for providing this explanation (which makes perfect sense by the way), and for being so kind to me when I clearly did not fully understand how all of the mechanics of the site work. Thanks again, and cheers! (Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 07:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC))

Welcome!

Hello, Hinckleycoldstorage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 00:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Longhair: Hey also wanted to say thanks for dropping me this welcome message! Cheers!! (Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)).

Steven Seagal

Hi. Thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Steven Seagal. However, most of the edit had to be reverted. Putting aside the questionable-looking nature of that webpage (it appears to be a disorganized list of items listed chronologically out of order), it makes no mention of Seagal's views on gun rights or any gun collection. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

@Nightscream: Thanks for dropping me a line re; the edit to Seagal's page! I actually meant to leave a second source ([interview that features him discussing his 2nd Amendment views]), but to be honest, I like the way it is now (with your edits) better. His sword collection and custom gun habits are far more interesting I think and also more unique and noteworthy than any of the other stuff I had originally. Thanks for cleaning that up, and cheers! (Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 07:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC))

Kit Steinkellner

Hi, I was reviewing Draft:Kit Steinkellner, and I saw that the citation that supports that she was raised in Santa Barbara, California does not appear to mention her name or that location. Am I missing something? Thanks for your work on it so far. Kees08 (Talk) 17:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Kees08: Hey! Thanks so much for reviewing the page, and also for finding that incorrect source! I'm not sure if I just pasted the wrong link, or if it's re-directing to the wrong story now since it's an old article, but either way, I went ahead and made an edit on the draft and replaced it with a correct source. Thanks for the help! Cheers Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

No worries. Looks good to me now. A couple of tips if you feel like improving it further: the references go after punctuation, so ,^[1] and not ^[1],

Also, you should cite where her age/date of birth came from, or remove it. That tends to be pretty contentious if it is uncited. Other than that, seems fine to me. Thanks for your good efforts, and apologies it took so long for it to get reviewed! Kees08 (Talk) 14:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kit Steinkellner has been accepted

Kit Steinkellner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kees08 (Talk) 14:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Withnail and I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duplass brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! Already fixed by someone else. Go team! Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 20:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Tim Tebow appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Muboshgu, I know we already discussed all this on your talk page, but just wanted to follow-up here to close the loop and thank you for correcting my mistake and also for showing me the proper sports transaction etiquette over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports/Handling sports transactions. Will be better prepared for next time! Cheers. Hinckleycoldstorage (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Happy to help. These pending transactions issues come up so often we had to draft a protocol. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)