Please contribute to Zeitgeist (movie) economic criticisms. Topics should include:

Money Supply Role of the Federal Reserve Central Bank management of interest rates

According to Webskeptic, The portayal of the Federal Reserve is a mixture of fact, fiction, and insinuation. http://webskeptic.wikidot.com/zeitgeist-federal-reserve


September 2008 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zeitgeist, the Movie. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Someguy1221 (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Normally, if there are no reliable sources that present a particular point of view, then that point of view is essentially forbidden on Wikipedia. The typical cure for this in an article like Zeitgeist is to link to relevant articles in the body of the text. Anyone who is curious about a point can follow those links to the articles describing mainstream treatment of the topic. However, for theories promoted only by amateurs, we relax the requirements of reliability from peer/editorially reviewed literature, and allow self-publications (including blogs) of experts in the field (see here). The status of "expert" is typically demonstrated by having published papers or reviews (especially well-received ones) in peer-reviewed journals on the topic you are citing him for. But if no respected economist has even blogged about this movie, then there are no sources that can be used for this information. Someguy1221 (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CI Financial edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CI Financial, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply