TBH I am finding wikipedia very complicated and time-consuming, so to try and make this simple.

I have posted a short link and contribution to the Lilly Parr article. Could you please contact me for more information on the subject? chat@sthelenschat.co.uk

Please delete the above if inappropriate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dallo100 (talkcontribs) 04:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Minorities Research Group edit

I made a bunch of spelling corrections, and another editor got one right that I hadn't, but there was one spelling repeated several times that has me worried. Given the name of the article I changed all "Minorites" -> "Minorities", but there were more than a couple. Could you check that 'Minorities' is right? The change I did is this. Shenme 11:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi there Shenme. You were correct about my spelling of Minorities! Thanks! I am dyslexic and don't always see missing i's etc,etc. I am in the process of updating the article today and will run a more thorough check, when I'm done.

Fluffball70 11:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Life's funny. I can read some Chinese, but get tongue-tied. :-) Shenme 11:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Invitations edit

Heya, I'd like to invite you to join WikiProject LGBT studies on the basis of your work so far. If you're interested, I am happy to adopt you as well. Would you be interested in either? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool. Add your name to our membership list and you're in! As for adoption, add {{adoptee|Dev920}} to your userpage, and it's official! I'm fairly new to the adoption process myself, but here's how I'm currently working: you are welcome to contact me if you have questions related to anything on Wikipedia, like how to edit, where to go for things etc., if you need help with anything, such as if you get into an argument, or have general problems, or if you just want general advice. I, for my part, will periodically look through your contributions and let you know if you're making any inadvertant mistakes. That sound OK? Would you like to suggest or change anything? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 

Hi, Fluffball70, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
  • Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • If you're planning to stay, have a square in our quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

:D Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

And with the exchange of userboxes, I pronounce thee my lawfullay acquired adoptee. Please feel free to bombard me with as many questions, requests and comments as you desire. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject newsletter edit

You signed up just in time. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

hello fluffball - i loved the gateways article and photo and would love to talk to you more about those days. i worked there 1983-85 and have plenty of photos. please contact me. Webgal64 (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)webgal@yahoo.comWebgal64 (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hello Fluffball edit

This is your adoptee-brother qwertyca :-D. Just dropped by to say hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Have lots of fun! Qwertyca 20:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:DYK edit

Hi - You may not be aware that your new article Una Troubridge has been nominated at T:TDYK as a candidate for the Main Page. It is recent enough (less than 5 days old) but not quite long enough (1,500 characters or more). Can you expand it at all? -- ALoan (Talk) 23:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Great - the article seems to have been pretty short on 1 March, so 5 days after 3 March is the critical date - are you likely to be able to expand it by then? -- ALoan (Talk) 20:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
You didn't close the ref bracket on your final reference, you silly sausage. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
OMG - that is absolutely fan-bloody-tastic. Well done! -- ALoan (Talk) 23:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

minor edits edit

Heya, I'm noticing that nearly all of your edits are marked minor. I haven't checked them all, but WP:MINOR says that edits marked minor should mean "only superficial differences exist between the current and previous version: typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc." Just to let you know, in case your edits aren't minor. Otherwise, bloody well done on your work to Minorities Research Group! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unless there's a reason for using a specific type of English, such as the article being on an American topic or item, it doesn't matter what you write in as long as it's consistent throughout the article. Thus, it would probably be best if you use the system you find yourself using without thinking. I assume that would be British English? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heya, just wanted to say well done on the great articles you've been writing. Another month or two and you'll be able to graduate from the adoption process! Is there any area you're unsure about, perhaps in the wikipedia namespace? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 10:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lili Elbe edit

Quite a bit of good work with Lili Elbe - Skysmith 11:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dubh Artach edit

Thanks for your continuing help with this. I have been looking for a modern photo with a free licence for ages, but no luck so far. I will certainly add one if I come across it. The 1960's NLB records are locked away in Edinburgh and hard to access, but I have added some comments about the name change. Ben MacDui (Talk) 08:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The image is wonderful of course and many thanks, although clearly the guardians of licensing virtue will zap it unless a better licence can be provided. Can you post a copy of their email? The key issue is whether they are releasing the image into the public domain, or only to Wikipedia. Ben MacDui (Talk) 09:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

SatyrBot 05:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fluff, I noticed you want to take MRG to GA. You might want to consider entering User:Messedrocker/Contest, it might be a helpful little incentive. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA refs edit

That's pretty nitpicky. The criteria doesn't say anything about referencing formats. Inline cites aren't even required, cripes, at least it has those. Anyway, go ahead and fail it, the user can resubmit it when they are ready, I think they left town or something. IvoShandor 01:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

As a note, the ref format concern seems to be something from FA that has been trying to sneak its way into GA criteria despite no discussion about it. IvoShandor 01:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I am not going to say I don't point it out from time to time. And I am not knocking you for the comment, I really think the GA criteria needs to be talked about, it seems that there are a number of points just like this one that aren't explicitly stated in the criteria but are de facto criteria anyway. IvoShandor 12:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

MRG edit

I think if you're getting that little help from MRG I would recommend you settle it up at GA, fix any errors and just go for FA. However I have found several issues with the article (let me just peer review it for you, why don't I? :) ):

  1. You have a lot of short paragraphs. You should really merge them where possible.
    Without having specifics, I work on a paragraph being 3-5 sentences, but there are some items that really don't belong to anything else Fluffball70
  2. There are some dreadful spelling errors, which is something I've been noticing in a lot of your work. Every time you finish an article, get someone in from WP:LoCE to look at it for you.
    Yes, that sounds like me! I have very little concept of when a word is spelt right or not, but have a better idea of grammar. In my daily life Microsoft Word tells me these things and I have just pasted the entire article into word and corrected the spellings. Fluffball70
  3. Would it be possible for you to add See Also and External Links sections?
    I had that originally, but was told to take it out! Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
  4. There seems to be a lot of gaps in your article. For example, this org is referred to in the past tense, but no reference is made to its demise. What happened to it?
    I have now added a 'The End' section to make it more clear. I wouldn't say it died...its members evolved its concepts into other groups that still exist today. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why was the organisation formed, and who by? What did the group actually do?

  1. I don't understand these questions as this is stated clearly in the first two paragraphs. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

How did Esme Langley acquire these three sons?

  1. The sources of all three sons are unclear other than what is said in Jill Gardiner's book. The important thing I have added is the reference to Esme Langley's book, which certainly talks about her first son. I have an autographed orginal ~50 year old copy, but was reluctant to put it in the article as it is too old and out of print to have an ISBN and I doubt if there are many copies around for people to reference. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

What was the actual content of Arena 3? What was the public reaction to MRG? What was the gay community's action?

  1. I have added a clearer reference to the article on Arena 3 written by Brighton ourstory and a synopsis of what they said. I think that if a reader wants more info on A3 they will need to vist the Brighton Ourstory archive or the Glasgow Women's library Lesbian archive(Whenever it reopens again...a very sad state of affairs :(). Sadly, the magazine and MRG is very underated, which is why I was keen to write this article. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

What you may find helpful is to read through your article and note all the things that a reader completely new to the subject would want to know.

  1. There are lots of things that I'd like to know too! Many areas on this subject could be developed, but I understand that most of it is not documented elsewhere and is languishing in storage boxes care of the Lesbian Archive and Infomation Centre in Glasgow. Brighton Ourstory has some info and there are lots of private individuals who can only really provide personal refernces. In some areas I can only provide someting of a start, in hope that someone in the future will be able to develop it more. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. What is the reference articles section for? How does it relate to the article?
    Th references is where all the infomation came from for the article. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I am aware of that, but I meant the reference articles section. You haven't cited them anywhere. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
  1. The article seems very dependant on one source, From the Closet to the Screen. Can you find any more?
    From the Closet to the screen is currently the best source and it is still in print. I have three or four other books that are relevant,out of print and not as good. I am sourcing one more, but as of yet I do not know it's quaility. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
  2. The Esme Langley section appear to be a short biography. How does this relate to the article?
    She was an essential key to the group. I am debating on giving her her own article. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
  3. This organisation needs to be put into context. I might know what the situation of British lesbians in the 70s was, but a Japanese businessman won't. You might want to put in a background section about the then current law and societal attitudes to lesbians, the progress to that point in gay rights (such as the legalisation of sodomy in 1967), gay culture of the time etc.
    Unfortnately, it's very difficult to find quotes for that. I will have a look around, but i have added a lot to 'The End' section. Fluffball70 10:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think this article needs a lot more work, to be honest, there'a lot of gaps.

On GA, I think you might benefit from viewing the GA evaluations at Talk:Washington_Blade. It contains evaluations by two different people with three different outcomes, which might help you get a good grasp. See also WP:WIAGA. Please don't worry about lack of peer review interest and the interminable wait for GA status, our backlog seems to be a growing problem across all of Wikipedia. Well get there. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 00:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, we're an encyclopedia and about the facts Fluff. The article can't be promoted until it is comprehensive and complete, not on the basis that there's more information to be found that you simply haven't accessed yet. To be honest, I don't know what the situation is on an article where most of the content is "still in boxes". But I don't think it bodes well. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

What gaps do you see? Because I don't see any? If it's a matter of just more Arena 3 content, I could probably find more, but didn't consider it relevant....Fluffball70 07:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

MessedRocker's Contest edit

Hello! If you have received this message, that means you have an article entered in MessedRocker's Contest. To help stimulate the contest, the rules have been modified: the next five people who promote an article to Good Article status will win, and that's it. Get writing so you can be one of the five! Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 10:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA on hold edit

Minorities Research Group:   GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. IvoShandor 16:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:DubhArtach.jpg edit

Fluff, did you upload this image knowing it would be deleted? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 16:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA review edit

Hi, a few weeks back you put the Nikki Grahame article on hold, pending fixes. The were all completed but you didnt return to check and another user has faield the article as it's hold time lapsed. I contacted that user and he suggested conatcting you about it, so would you mind reading the page again for me? regards. Gungadin 13:09, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I left my GA review on the talk page of gateways club. Feel free to renominate it and let me know after fixes have been made. I will re-review it as it seems that it got little attention last time around.--Cronholm144 00:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:DubhArtach.jpg listed for deletion edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:DubhArtach.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Iamunknown 05:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject newsletter edit

Your cat looks a lot like my cat! edit

Apologies if this isn't the appropriate place to post this -- I'm very new to Wikipedia, and couldn't find how to contact you otherwise. I just saw the photo you posted on the Devon Rex page and WOW your cat looks like mine! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Twinkleblue (talkcontribs) 03:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heya! edit

Hey, I'm back from exam leave. I see you've been working on The Albert Kennedy Trust. Aren't they fantastic? Anyway, I was wondering how you are. I think you've got the hang of editing, so you could graduate soon, but there's one thing: I'd really like to see some of your tremendous work make FA before you go. I am happy to help you on any article that you would like to get up there. Interested? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 09:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! edit

You are the winner of our Jumpaclass competition, with 12 points! As the winner, your prize is to pick any topic for our monthly collaboration. What would you like? :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's okay, I've done it. Congratulations my adoptee. ;D Do you think you've got a good hang on the system now? If yes, you might want to start thinking about graduation... Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 12:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Wardour Castle edit

I've made some additions (photo, infobox, references etc) to New Wardour Castle which the talk page says you are working on. Are you also interested in Wardour Castle as I've made some changes there as well (after my visit today) and would be grateful if you would take a look.— Rod talk 22:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've added a gallery of images to New Wardour Castle but I'm not sure if they are labelled correctly - there are more under CC licencing at Geograph.— Rod talk 13:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot (talk) 23:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

Delivered by SatyrBot around 17:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC) SatyrBot (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter edit

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter (July 2008) edit

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 12:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter edit

This newsletter was sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC) by the request of Moni3 (talk)Reply

WikiProject LGBT studies Newsletter (June 2009) edit

  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:GatewaysFloor.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GatewaysFloor.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-Free rationale for File:LilyParr3.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LilyParr3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-Free rationale for File:Lilyparr1.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lilyparr1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-Free rationale for File:Lilyparr2.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lilyparr2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! edit

 
Hello, Fluffball70. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Image of Gateways club door edit

Hi, I would like to use your image of the Gateways club door as a book cover for a fab LGBT oral history book that I'm publishing for a client/ author. Please can you email me to discuss? I would really like a hi-res version if you have one. Thanks v much! email: aitch_ess@yahoo.co.uk Aitchess67 (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative edit

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Fluffball70! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)! edit

WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi Fluffball70! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Barkhammanor.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Pride 2014 edit

Hi Fluffball70. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! --Another Believer (Talk) 16:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Wokingham Borough Council Election Results 2014.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Wokingham Borough Council Election Results 2014.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Pride 2016 edit

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

  1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
  2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
  3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia edit

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wokingham by-election article edit

Just to let you know, we don't do articles on individual council by-elections. They are listed at the main article on elections to that council (as you can see, the 2017 one is already listed at Wokingham Borough Council elections#2013-present. If you insist, we can waste time with an AfD, but it will end up with the article being deleted or redirected. Up to you. Cheers, Number 57 13:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

We're on Twitter! edit

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!
Hello Fluffball70!
Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Fluffball70. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cats+Lesbian+Religion edit

Ok #1 My name is Nikki, and I am new to Wikimedia but old to Wikipedia I am in the closet right now ,because my parents and my religion. See I am a Christian, and the bible says god man woman for man not woman for woman or anything like that and you cant reproduce with another woman can you? Well I was looking through your wiki badges thingies and I saw it said your a pagan. I was like well I'm gonna ask her about what she thinks. And also I think cats are completely gross because all they do is shit in a box and get fur everywhere plus meow there heads off. Dogs are wayyyyy better! Tell me why you like cats??

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Fluffball70. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JBThurston.JPG edit

 

The file File:JBThurston.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Your edit to Holt Copse & Joel Park has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC) @JJMC89:  - I don't not understand where the problem is? My sources are quoted and attributed. You cannot change the history of this park and no-one 'owns' the history either. The source is a reputable one - i.e the Wokingham Society. I also took the pictures myself.Reply

 
 

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Election templates edit

Hi! Thanks for making 2021 Wokingham Borough Council election - saw it quickly on my rounds... Just so you can use it in the future, the election results template has the ability to have the rejected ballots within it (Template:Election box rejected), so you don't need to add it separately underneath. Happy editing, Gazamp (talk) 13:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Election result : poorly calculated numbers edit

Hello

Just informing you that when calculating a percentage of the popular vote, it is important to ignore spoiled and rejected ballots, otherwise your percentages will not add up to 100%, this is a minor issue but can be very frustrating when one tries to see why the numbers don't add up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanadianScotNationalist (talkcontribs) 22:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Wokingham Borough Council election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Isabel Whitney edit

 

The article Isabel Whitney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NARTIST fail

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 16:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply