User talk:Fadesga/Archives/2013/May

Active discussions

The term synagogue

I wasn't sure if the term refers to the building or to the congregation, but I see it describes both [1], so it's the same like with the term "church", so I will move all project tags of synagogues to "building". Hoverfish Talk 17:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Also when we say The Roman Catholic Church in Uruguay, we mean the institution, not any building in particular, so I will follow the same logic with synagogue(s). Hoverfish Talk 17:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

San Miguel?

The "Parish Church of Our Lady of the Guard", Porongos 2278, that you mention in La Figurita, must be the one called Parroquia San Miguel (which is at Concepción Arenal and Porrongos, but with the main entrance on Arenal)? I was passing today on my way to San Pancracio and La Merced and shot a couple of photos of it, but I must try to stitch them into one, as there is no place to stand so as to take in the whole facade. Hoverfish Talk 23:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Churches, etc.

Hello there! Let me know if you need any help editing Uruguay-related articles, like the Virgen del Carmen article. I tried to review the new article but left it alone, given you placed the {{in use}} on it. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Martin Luther's Birth House, Fadesga!

Wikipedia editor Jezhotwells just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs expansion, needs reliable references. Wikipedia is not a reliable reference

To reply, leave a comment on Jezhotwells's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf. Since you had some involvement with the Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 23:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Tagg Romney for deletion


A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tagg Romney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagg Romney (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Frank  |  talk  12:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paso de las Duranas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tabaré Hackenbruch

Hello, Fadesga. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tabaré Hackenbruch, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf

Hello Fadesga,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Schwarzrheindorf/Vilich-Rheindorf for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kagawaen (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Fadesga/Archives/2013/May".