Welcome edit

/Archive 1

Hello, Elaich, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mushroom 17:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)Reply


As of today, I am taking a Wikibreak from all things Ed, Edd n Eddy. -- Elaich talk 19:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

for past disagreements... edit

Just a Note edit

Hey, hope you have a good holiday!

For the part i added for the Big Picture Show, I just wanted to clarify with you, that the article was in the November issue that i have with me.

And I've taken it out as it offers nothing that hasn't already been said even if it is from a different source. treelo radda 18:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Should Adult Swim task force cover anime and off-network programming? edit

Comments? Please visit this discussion. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Level 3!? edit

You are joking, right? If not, please regard that it's called a mistake!--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 17:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please WP:AGF about your fellow editors. The edits may be unsourced WP:OR, but they are factual and not vandalism. A simple rewrite if you dislike the tone and asking for a source or finding one yourself would have sufficed. Do not accuse others of vandalism. You may like to read WP:OWN as you seem to be very attached to retaining the article as you wish, to the extent of shouting at other editors (not just User:Editor510) in edit summaries [1] and claiming vandalism for their good faith edits. That is considered very bad manners, and a level 3 warning is appropriate only if the obvious intent was vandalism, as is explicitly stated at Wikipedia:UTM#Multi-level_templates. Simply explain to them your opinion, and it may be a simple change in wording such as saying another sentence which describes the different date a series came out in another country, or adding a cite, is all that needs to be done to achieve a version with which everyone is happy and by which the articles are improved. It could be that other editor even got the date it aired wrong, but made a simple mistake, which is not vandalism. Wikipedia is a collaborative venture, and that's how the articles best improve and a good atmosphere conducive to keeping editors on the project is maintained. Consider this a level 3 warning (just joking :) ) Sticky Parkin 19:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have reviewed some Wiki policies... edit

Your edits do smell like Ownage. I do believe that the warning I was given is pot-kettle-kettle-pot (that means you are a hypocrite in all due respect, if you don't speak British). Also, it helps not to focus attention to just one thing. I am not attempting to bully, hurt, or anger you. I am just stating that you should really look at your wrongs before you look at mine. Thanks. :)--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 10:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I went looking for the edit that has caused such a furor, and surprise! It's nowhere to be found! So, now nobody can even look at it to see what the problem was. If you got some friendly admin to delete it, there's a lot more brewing here than an accusation of vandalism. -- Elaich talk 17:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it was a blip. Just leave it. Don't do a 66.213.25.12 and stalk me...--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 12:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Bangles edit

Apologies for the lateness of this reply, but I'm not here very often any more. Sorry about the Bangles edit; I didn't check the history very thoroughly, I'm afraid, so I assumed that comment was an overly-POV bit that nobody else had gotten around to removing yet. I do think you were overly pessimistic about Bell247's reaction, though, as I see from the history that to this date (three months later) s/he still hasn't put it back. -- CWesling (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:TOON rollcall edit

Hello Elaich, it's been a while huh? You might remember adding your interest to work as part of the Cartoon Network Wikiproject here, since you did this there has been very little activity with few to none of the members participating or have been idle for some time and as such may be mothballing the Wikiproject as inactive. I'm going over the list for WP:TOON and need to know if you wish to still be a member. I know you might have not have edited in some time (at least through this account) but I'll wait until 5th January 2010 to see whether or not you still wish to be a part of this or not. If you don't respond to this notice specifically by mentioning it at WT:TOON (not my talkpage or here, I won't be watchlisting talkpages) or removing your name from the list I'll assume you are no longer interested and will remove your name. Hope you decide to work here again. treelo radda 18:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012 edit

Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Imzadi 1979  22:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Main page appearance: Ed, Edd n Eddy edit

This is a note to let the main editors of Ed, Edd n Eddy know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 23, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 23, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Ed, Edd n Eddy is an animated television series created by Danny Antonucci and produced by Canada-based a.k.a. Cartoon. It premiered on Cartoon Network on January 4, 1999, and ended on November 8, 2009 with the premiere of the series' TV movie finale, Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show. Designed to resemble classic cartoons from the 1940s to the 1970s, the series revolves around three adolescent boys known as "the Eds", who constantly invent schemes to make money from their peers to purchase jawbreakers. Their plans usually fail, leaving them in various predicaments. Before signing a contract with Cartoon Network, Antonucci approached Nickelodeon, but the channel demanded creative control of the show, which Antonucci did not agree to. Several specials, shorts, and video games either based on the series or featuring the series' characters have been produced. Viewed from 31 million households in 29 countries by both children and adults, Ed, Edd n Eddy received positive reviews and several awards and nominations. It remains the longest-running original Cartoon Network series and Canadian-made animated series to date. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Home Country (book) edit

 

The article Home Country (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply