DylanLacey

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars by death toll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chadian Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of genocides by death toll, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

World War II

Hi Dylan, I've just reverted your change to this article again as the World War II casualties does not provide a source for this figure, while the figure in the World War II article is referenced. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Syria groups

The table in which you put the Future Movement and your references is for the main conflict in Syria. None of your sources confirm the Future Movement is involved in fighting in Syria. One only talks vaguely about arms support (like Turkey, Qatar, etc). Your references talk about the group's involvement in fighting against Hezbollah in Lebanon. We have a separate table for that issue titled Spillover in Lebanon, where the group is already listed. EkoGraf (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of wars involving New Zealand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to War in Afghanistan, Zangezur, Maori and Nakhichevan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of wars involving New Zealand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to War in Afghanistan, Zangezur, Maori and Nakhichevan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Picking and choosing sources

Picking and choosing sources goes against the policy in wp:npov. Please don't do it again. Consider this a caution. Pass a Method talk 22:57, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

You never explained, or provided conflicting sources, or discussed on the talk page the conflicting sources regarding Iraq's presence in the Syrian civil war. It is at worst a grey area, considering that Iraq worked alongside Syria against the rebels in the spillover in Iraq. I don't believe I was being biased, since I derived my sources regarding Iraq from the page Foreign involvement in the Syrian civil war which lists Iraq as a supporter of the Syrian government, and provides four sources. DylanLacey (talk) 00:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wars involving the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabaab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

al qaeda

since you and i are involved in a dispute with Sopher99, please discuss the subjcet at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al-Qaeda#al_nusra_front_direct_or_indirect_affiliate Ionchari (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

since you were involved, can you please fix the problem at the al qaeda article Ionchari (talk) 20:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Questionable deletions

You have already been cautioned in the past about questionable additions and deletions. Yesterday you made another deletion here. Please be more careful. Is there a reason you removed Syrian resistence? Pass a Method talk 22:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Syrian resistance

Hey I agree with you about the Syrian resistance and not adding small groups. I already have my 1 revert on the infobox in the past 24 hours, but you don't, so you could simply remove it. Sopher99 (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

List of wars involving the United States

Hi,

I modified your table to reduce formatting complexity. You initially formatted each cell with a specific background color (i.e. style="background:#efefef"). However, the "wikitable" style already applies a near-identical color by default. I removed your color overrides for each cell, and the resulting difference is imperceptible.

Likewise, I attempted to simplify your color styling of the header row (i.e. style="background:#002299"). Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the "wikitable" style refuses to accept row-level formatting for the background color (though it did accept row-level formatting for the text color). I went ahead and kept your cell-level coloring, but simplified the color choice to "navy". Again, this results in an imperceptible change.

Thank you for starting the cleanup on that page. It was a pathetic mess when I first visited it, and your new table is much improved. I, myself, have no knowledge about the article, so I'm hesitant to make the kind of change you implemented (like, I wasn't clear as to which data points were even valid for inclusion in that page, and which ones should be deleted for being outside the scope of the topic).

—Samatict (talk) 06:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your help with formatting. I copied the template from other "List of wars involving..." pages. My motivation was that there were pages for wars involving small African countries that had far better coverage than this one, which is kind of ridiculous considering the significance of U.S. foreign policy. I plan to continue reformatting, due to the systemic bias and inaccuracies of the older conflicts section. But I am not sure how to go about formatting WWII into the new format (with the different theaters). Any suggestions would be welcome. DylanLacey (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

You can solve the WWII theaters issue by giving that entire war its own table (and thus having the necessary number of columns). I actually think the page would be much improved if the wars were broken up across a few tables (e.g. Revolutionary War, 1785-1811, War of 1812, 1815-1845, Mexican-American War, 1847-1860, Civil War, etc). This would allow the Table of Contents at the top to provide quick access to various points in the chronology.

Currently, finding a war pretty much necessitates massive scrolling, or repetitive use of the CTRL+F find function of the browser. Large tables get really unwieldy, especially as new data points are added. Also, finding a specific cell to edit is difficult when the whole table has to be loaded for modification.

—Samatict (talk) 07:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Syrian civil war

Hey Dylan, I would appreciate it if you removed the taliban from the Syrian civil war infobox, as they are only a minor group and their leaders have said there has been no official decision to participate in Syria, and only arabs have went there on their own decision. Sopher99 (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Done, thanks for letting me know. DylanLacey (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Sopher99 (talk) 01:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Inappropriate cut/pasting between articles

Dylan you seem to be cut/pasting the "Other deadly events" section of the article List of wars and anthropogenic disasters by death toll to the article List of genocides by death toll. There's been discussion on the article's talk page about moving material around. Maybe you should join it. The material you're cutting and pasting is not the genocides portion of the article, it's "other deadly events". You'll notice that they're not listed in the "Genocides and alleged genocides" section of the articles because most of them are either clearly not genocides (Mao Zedong era, Nanking massacre, Operation Condor, Sanctions against Iraq, Great Fire of Smyrna, etc) or their scope is debated and either falls short of or exceeds the parameters of a genocide (Soviet Crimes, Crimes in the Congo Free State, etc). Please stop just cutting and pasting. If yo're still confused please utilize the talk pages of the articles in question. GraniteSand (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Mass surveillance

WikiProject Mass Surveillance Dear, DylanLacey. We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Mass surveillance, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to the privacy and global surveillance. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. -- HectorMoffet (talk) 11:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac Union Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

List of wars involving Germany

East Germany's wars don't belong on that list in the same way as wars of the Republic of Hawaii or the Texas Republic don't belong on the list of war involving the USA. It's not the same country. There is probably not a list of Texan wars, but a chapter in the History of Texas. The same goes for East Germany.--Beliar (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey there, I disagree. Texas or Hawaii republics did not claim to represent the United States, as a whole. 'East Germany' is not the name of the country, it was the 'German Democratic Republic', meaning it claimed to be 'Germany' (As did West Germany). Germany has been a wide variety of political entities in its brief history as a sovereign state; and ideally this article should encompass all of them. I will add more information to the beginning of the article as clarification. DylanLacey (talk) 03:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Hey, thanks for showing support for my edit on "List of wars involving the United States". I've cleaned up the damage inflicted by vandals and have added more sourced information to prevent further vandalizing and edit warring. Thanks again for your support. UnbiasedVictory (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)}}

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of invasions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian Kingdom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Al-Qaida flag

Hello. Regarding your change of the flag image at al-Qaida from the generic white-on-black shahadah to the flag of Jabhat an-Nusrah: Why do you think should this flag be used as the main image for the article? Why is it "more relevant"? Jabhat an-Nusrah is only one of several direct affiliates of al-Qaida central. Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, and al-Shabaab are also direct affiliates, but they use a very different flag (the same flag as ISIS).

Previously an image representing the Flag of al-Qaida in Iraq was used in the al-Qaida article. This caused a great deal of misinformation - many infoboxes still use Flag of al-Qaeda in Iraq.svg as the Flag of al-Qaida. This was made worse by Flag of al-Qaeda.svg redirecting to Flag of al-Qaeda in Iraq.svg. I have redirected Flag of al-Qaeda.svg to Flag of Jihad.svg. I provided a source identifying this as the flag of al-Qaida: "The traditional al-Qaeda flag has a black rectangular background with the words “There is no god but God and Muhammad is the messenger of God” written in the Thuluth Islamic script." (i.e., Flag of Jihad.svg) ... "After this split [between ISI and al-Qaida], Jabhat al-Nusra abandoned the ISI flag, which it raised for two years in Syria and adopted the original al-Qaeda flag, with the addition of the words “Jabhat al-Nusra”" (Flag_of_the_Al-Nusra_Front.svg) ... "Osama bin Laden appeared in speeches, messages and photos with the original al-Qaeda flag in the background." [1] See photo from Bin Laden's 1998 press conference: http://www.longwarjournal.org/threat-matrix/images/zawahiri-bin-laden.jpg.

If it is appropriate to use the white-on-black shahadah flag to represent al-Qaida in infoboxes, then it should be fine to use it as the main image for the al-Qaida article. --Axiom292 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of wars involving Russia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't need a source; I was trimming redundant content in the table, like listing both parts of the Novorossiya confederation, when the table needs to briefly list the belligerents, or when 'Georgian government' was listed instead of just 'Georgia'. Did you even look at what my edit was? DylanLacey (talk) 07:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Correct protocol is to take it to the relevant talk page so as discuss major changes with other editors. It's known as WP:BRD, not WP:BRRRRRRD. Note, also, that the D stand for discuss, not disregard. Also, please provide WP:ES even for minor changes. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 07:19, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at the Village Pump

Hello! This message is to notify you that there is a discussion at the Wikipedia Village Pump that may be of interest to you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Intervention in Donbass

Hi mate, i just wondered why you reverted the change on intervention in Donbass. A supposed military itnervetnion is denied by Russia, and that is kind of essential to the context. Since is says denied by Russia on the page "War in Donbass", why can it not say so in this article aswell?

Hey, I believe that it's important to just keep very key details in that section, it should be very limited. I'll go ahead and take that whole line out, the Minsk Protocol should cover it. DylanLacey (talk) 21:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

WWII Infobox vote

Hello, I noticed that you voiced your opinion regarding the WWII Infobox debate, and I'd like to point to the formal voting mechanism in the Request for comment: WWII infobox section of the WWII talk page. There are three option available to anyone that wants to cast a vote. --E-960 (talk) 10:19, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

My apologies

...if I was a bit rough with you -- I was in a hurry, and should probably have left it until I had more time in my hands. We can discuss it later, ey? --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 06:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem; I agree that the Peshmerga should be included (just other groups are more important). DylanLacey (talk) 06:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Israel is not a combatant in Syrian Civil War

This has been discussed many times and there just are no RS to add Israel into the infobox including the map key. You risk sanctions for making edits like this one. Legacypac (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean no reliable sources? It's a map of Syria. Do you deny that the Golan Heights is controlled by Israel? Including Israel in the key does not infer that Israel is a combatant in the civil war. DylanLacey (talk) 03:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Obviously Golan is occupied by Israel for decades, but naming them in the map legend suggests strongly they are a combatant in the Civil War. We don't name other countries shown either. Legacypac (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Iraqi Insurgency fatalities

Hi. I see you’ve changed my edit about Iraqi insurgency cumulative fatalities, deleting the brackets “civilians only”. Since the introduction to the page says that “Fatality figures include both civilian and military deaths unless otherwise indicated”, and Iraq Body Count data include only civilian deaths, I think it should be indicated (with something more than just a plus sign), or another source for combatant deaths should be found. For the year 2014, an article of analysis by IBC included combatant deaths estimates, and I had indicated them distinguishing them from the civilian deaths, which are not estimates but documented deaths. I see you have added the two data and put a plus sign, which may be a bit misleading, but acceptable since the quotation clarifies the issue.Nykterinos (talk) 10:43, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of major terrorist incidents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Republican Party presidential debates, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RNC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War

The article List of armed groups in the Syrian Civil War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not an article, just a list of alleged beligerents

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lipsquid (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DylanLacey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DylanLacey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ESEAP Conference 2018

Hello DylanLacey,

I’m Irvin from PhilWiki Community, a member of the Communication Committee of the ESEAP Conference. ESEAP Conference 2018 is a regional conference for Wikimedia communities throughout the ESEAP region: ESEAP stands for East, Southeast Asia, and Pacific. Taking place in Bali, Indonesia on 5–6 May 2018, this is the first regional conference for these Wikimedia communities.

East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific are the most under-represented regions within the Wikimedia community. There is a significant number of Wikimedia contributors in our regions, yet we continue to struggle in establishing a well-managed community. This conference will bring participants from various ESEAP communities together in order to better understand the issues and to look for solutions. It also aims to connect people of the Wikimedia movement within ESEAP regions, to share ideas, and to build regional collaborations that are impossible to achieve through online communication.

We’ve got a lot of participation from several countries, but we’re lacking from your country. As we need more participants from your country, we believe that your contribution and participation would be a valuable asset to the success of this event. If you would like to participate in the conference, please do fill the form as soon as possible (by April 5, 2018) and we’ll inform you if you get selected for the conference.

Thank you and we hope to see you soon. --Filipinayzd 01:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of ongoing protests and civil unrest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ongoing protests and civil unrest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ongoing protests and civil unrest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 15:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DylanLacey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)