Drhoehl

Welcome!

Hello, Drhoehl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Skysmith 21:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Pratt/Bosendorfer

Hi Drhoehl. I responded on Bosendorfer's talk page, but there is some kind of error and that page won't show up now, and which may clear up by the time you read this, but just in case, here is the diff of my response. I originally added that paragraph of a few particular users by searching the articles that actually linked to the Bosendorfer article, and Pratt's did not. But you have an album notes reference which is an absolutely perfect reference (see Template:Cite album-notes), and you're right, better than most. I have reverted back to your addition and when you have time, if you could fill out that template and add as a reference to the article that would be wonderful. And I would definately mention and link the Bosendorder in Pratt's article as well. If you need any assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Thank you so much for clearing that up and your contributions are appreciated. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I've listened to some samples of this recording at Amazon and I must say I am impressed. I would like to help improve his article, although my time is quite limited these days as well. Research is the most time-consuming so if you have some information to add, I have the wiki editing knowledge, and maybe between the two of us we can get it up to some higher quality some day soon. I will add it to my watchlist. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		Awarded to Drhoehl for exceptional effort and dedication to music-related articles. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Jacques Abram and Arthur Benjamin

Never any need to apologise for talking, Drhoehl. If only there was more talk and less negative action in the world. There are various online sources for the Benjamin premieres by Abram, such as here and here. Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

List of Classical Pianists

Thanks for fixing my Warren Jones link. I should have checked before adding it. Nice work on this list, it must be tough to keep it in order.Wrightjack —Preceding comment was added at 20:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Non-opera classical singer cats

Thanks for your response. I'm not sure I can point you to any substantial discussions about non-operatic cats. Most of it has been two-way stuff on talk pages just like this. I would guess there are about a dozen or two articles on classical singers who never sang opera, either people who were too avant garde for anything but art song, or Edwardian English singers who disdained the stage as morally hazardous (these people are by and large in the top vocal categories like Category:sopranos). Almost every lieder singer also did opera, so ideally lieder categories should be put on them.

At some point you may come across WP:MUSCAT. This classification system was developed by the Biography (musicians) Project number crunchers to handle the large numbers of similar articles found in popular music. I'm opposed to its use for classical singers. They recommend what they call '3rd order' (i.e. triple attribute) categories, e.g. Albanian lieder bass-baritones, which for us can result in almost as many categories as there are articles. I prefer the '2nd order' cats we are using for opera singers (e.g. 'Operatic sopranos' and 'German opera singers'.

Hope this helps! Best.--Kleinzach (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

List of classical pianists – consider Preview button

May I suggest you use the "Show preview" button when editing the List of classical pianists in order to reduce the number of changes in the page history and the number of entries in many people's Watchlists. See also: Template:uw-preview. All the best, Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I've left you a response on your talk page. Drhoehl (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Herman Rie-eitzel

Thanks. You can make a redirect on the other spelling - then there's no problem. (Do join us in the imbroglio!) --Kleinzach (talk) 00:18, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Amy Evans?

I see that you redlinked her. Are you planning to write an article about her? I saw something about her here: http://www.pefagan.com/music/fghp/aedisco.htm She's also mentioned in two shows here: http://library.kent.ac.uk/library/special/icons/playbills/playdat2.htm See also http://pinafore.www3.50megs.com/a-evans.html and http://aboutcards.blogspot.com/2008/04/unpopular-amy-evans-actress-postcard.html Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

In the US, at least, the photo is public domain. I have no doubt that it can be used on Wikipedia. Still, many U.K. webmasters object to copying on Wikipedia without asking, and even though they have no legal right to prevent us, some wikipedians prefer to ask for permission. I'll leave it up to you. If you decide to do an article on Evans, please let me know, and I'll take a look. If you decide NOT to do and article, please let me know, and I'll de-redlink the name. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Looks good! Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You wrote that the book about Lytton suggests that Evans had been in A Waltz Dream in 1908, well before Fallen Fairies. I can't prove that this is wrong, but it is absolutely certain that she was in A Waltz Dream in 1911. There are a million photos with her and Lily Elsie from the 1911 production, and Play Pictorial lists her in the 1911 cast but not the 1908 cast. I think the book about Lytton just wrongly *assumed* that she had been in the original production.

Then you wrote, "Second, what I've seen indicates that the understudy was not Evans but someone whose name eludes me at the moment, and it does strike me as implausible that Evans would have joined the production as an understudy less than a week before she took over the role." I have seen at least two sources that say she was the understudy: [1]; and [2]. But I think you are right, because a letter from Gilbert refers to a Miss Venning. I'll make the change. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Can you fill out the "recordings" section a bit more? It would be good to say, for each recording, what the accompaniment was (piano? orchestra?) and who was the conductor. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:24, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You wrote, "do you think it would enhance the article if I were to take a photo of one of the test pressings?" Sure! When you upload the photo, you need to license it under GFDL or release it to the public domain. Noted, re: the record label names. I will trust you on those, as you are far more knowledgeable about it than me. I suggest that you add info to the appropriate Edison articles to mention the English company and add a clarification, if necessary, to the Pathe article. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

5/11 DYK

On 11 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amy Evans, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 22:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Kathryn Toyama

Well hello Drhoehl! So nice to hear from you. I think I put her on that list for lack of a better place. Like you said, she is classically trained, but now that you mention it, I don't think there is history of a significant career in classical music, no. Her MySpace page says Long after leaving the pressures of classical piano competition, but according to her bio on her website she left competition at age 16. Thanks for catching that, and please feel free to move her to a more appropriate list. Blessings. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 04:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

D'oh! I forgot about that list. Thanks again. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 04:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Henry Jolles

On 4 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Jolles, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Stubs

Hello, Drhoehl. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You may also be interested in the templates at {{Refref}}. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 19:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Drhoehl. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Simultaneous editing

Hi there--I had noted you added a wikilink to that pianist on the Akin Euba article, which is on my watchlist (I am a friend of his), and followed you to the article about the pianist, about whom I hadn't heard. But I edit a lot of music-related articles. I also added links to Schmalfuss in the articles about his teachers (something I always do for composers as well, to show who was whose student or teacher). It's something Wikipedia can do better than a print encyclopedia! Badagnani (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK thanks

Thanks for the heads' up. I added an alt hook that ought to work. Too bad the DYKs focus more on trivia with a cite after it than on info that says something telling about the article. I hope you're doing well! -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for George Georgescu

On April 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Georgescu, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 22:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Did you know question

Hello! Your submission of Washington National Opera (1919-1936) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Washington National Opera (1919-1936)

On May 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Washington National Opera (1919-1936), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Tale for a Deaf Ear

Thanks for your work on this article. I had no idea this was a multi-language work. I have a question. Are the scenes in the Gateses' home in English?Singingdaisies (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

How interesting. It seems likely that the non-miracle scenes were in English. It would be great if we could find a source that talks a bit more about the use of multiple languages in the opera.Singingdaisies (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

LOOK

Hi. I like your copy edits (note that they have presented Trial 4 times - perhaps that is worth mentioning. Trial is a short one-act opera, so it is usually performed together with another piece). I think we should keep the list of productions. They have hyperlinks to our articles, so people interested in light opera will be able to quickly link to useful information. The article is short, so there's no space issue. Why make people click to the company's website to find it? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

BTW, the company has done the standard 11 G&S operas. They never did Utopia, Limited or The Grand Duke, and of course they never did Thespis (opera). They have done Trial 4 times; Pinafore 4 times; Pirates 5 times!; Gondoliers 3 times; Mikado 4 times; -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Amato Opera

I'm sad that you put up the CopyVio tag. Can't you rescue the article? The copyvio tag is just the most horrible thing in the world. No one is going to sue Wikipedia for repeating too much text from a website of a defunct and tiny opera company - I am sure they love the Wiki article; and IMO the best thing to do is to do a couple quick rewrites to avoid direct copying and then ask other editors to do more work. Plus, I'm not even sure what you found that was copied from the company's website. In fact, the company may have copied Wikipedia. - Ssilvers (talk) 23:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

If a copyright problem is not so big as to be a legal issue, you can use the talk page instead to describe the problem and ask for help. These opera companies do not mind if Wikipedia uses some language from their websites, as long as there is a link to their websites - the Wikipedia articles bring traffic to their websites. If you put the copyvio tag on, the article might be deleted altogether, and the Amato article was a fairly mature article that lots of people had worked on for years. Can you give me a link to the page at Amato's website where you see a copyright vio? I just looked and can't find it! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

I fixed the article. Which other articles have copyvio tags on them? -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Amy Evans

Nice work on the article! Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. Sorry, I don't have a source. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Belated question re: Arisaka

I've readded your image, File:Arisaka with chrysanthemum intact.jpg, to the article in the relevant section. --BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 22:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK problem

Hello! Your submission of Son and Stranger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LittleMountain5 ^{Happy Thanksgiving!} 19:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Son and Stranger

On November 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Son and Stranger, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks so much for tackling those voice articles in "the swamp". Best wishes and a very Happy New Year... Voceditenore (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

(Taking you at your word about replying on my own page, not yours!) Thanks for the kind words and the new year's wishes, which I reciprocate 100%. A couple of notes about those voice articles. First, I'm checking, and if need be adjusting, only the contributions by Nrswanson and his known clones. If new alter egos crop up, we'll need to check those against the articles as well. Second, these articles don't strike me as Wikipedia at its best; they read like somebody's "Vocal Physiology 101" textbook from 1952. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they in fact do crib somebody's Vocal Physiology 101 textbook from 1952--somehow I can't imagine anybody in the modern-day world deliberately using the term "vocal pedigogists"--but I don't have the printed references to check, so I'm making the perhaps heroic assumption that others have been more scrupulous than Nrweighbabe in paraphrasing their sources. Nonetheless, I suspect that someone with access to those resources really should give the articles a hard look.

OK, enough of letting Nr. in his many guises spoil this pristine new year's day. Again, all the best for the coming year! Drhoehl (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Silly me! I forgot my own instructions and hadn't put your page on watch. Re this, no not that chap. But... check your email for some developments. I fear the "swan song" is yet to be sung. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 11:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

your dyk hook has a problem

There are a few comments about your dyk hook here which I am sure you can easily fix. Altogether, a very nice article. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 22:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Alice Verlet

On January 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alice Verlet, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Message to all members of WikiProject Opera

Please see our project's talk page for a discussion of the possible changes to Wikipedia's policy on the biographies of living persons and the implications this will have for many articles under the project's banner. This is especially important if you are looking after or have created unreferenced or minimally referenced opera-related biographies of living people. Voceditenore (talk) 16:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for starting the straw poll. Participants seem to appreciate it. Just to correct one point: Quiddity (talk · contribs) has now kindly created an infobox for classcical musicians that may be of intererest to those that wish to use them. Cheers --Jubilee♫clipman 06:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

You're most welcome--and thank you for the kind words. I'll have a look at the new creation, although, as I've now noted in the discussion proper, I am a pessimist that anything short of a total ban can put this recurring argument to rest. Just call me "Mr. Glass Half Empty," I guess. Drhoehl (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

re Friedrich Wührer.

Dear Drhoehl, please change the link for my Royale Pages in the Wührer Wiki page, it's no longer at geocities but now to be found here:

http://www.soundfountain.com/allegro-royale/catalogue.html

Regards, Ernst Lumpe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.1.191.34 (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Left view.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Left view.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  fetchcomms☛ 19:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Drhoehl. You have new messages at Fetchcomms's talk page.

You can remove this notice at any time by removing this code.  fetchcomms☛ 20:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Fancy going fishing sometime?

[3] Rainbow or Lake? The latter are usually much bigger and heavier, IIRC! --Jubilee♫clipman 01:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Good idea--but we'd better make sure to wear extra-tall waders! Thanks for a chuckle. Drhoehl (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

And watch out for giant inflatables... --Jubilee♫clipman 02:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ortgies 7.65mm Semi-Automatic Pistol

Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Orion Records

Hello. I was wondering if you could perhaps come up with any more sources for this article? Ideally, sources which include significant third-party coverage would be preferred. As it stands now, the only source in the article doesn't do a whole lot for establishing the notability of the label. Also, without more references, the article is pushing original research if they are not backed up by the one source in the article. I was thinking of putting a PROD tag on it, but I would like to give you the chance to improve the referencing, otherwise I could tag it with the appropriate article issues tags.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 17:51, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Herman Rietzel

Hello, Drhoehl, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herman Rietzel whether the article Herman Rietzel should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Herman Rietzel, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! SL93 (talk) 21:09, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications

Hi Drhoehl,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 22:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Zoellner Quartet

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject Opera

I'm writing to members of WikiProject Opera who have been active on the talk page over the last year. We currently have a proposal to add infoboxes about individual operas to their articles. As this would involve a fairly major change from our current practice, and lead to a potentially lengthy transition, it would be helpful to hear the views from as many project members as possible. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Opera infoboxes. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 09:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Opera Project stuff

Hi, I'm writing to members who participated in the March 2013 discussions about the possibility of developing an opera infobox. We now have a reasonably stable and usable box with examples of how it would look in articles at Template:Infobox opera and a new discussion re its potential addition to the project's Article Guide as an option for opera articles. The discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Opera Infobox update. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lilliburlero Variations for Two Pianos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triplets. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Drhoehl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Drhoehl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drhoehl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Drhoehl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)