DenbySpinks

Evil Under the Sun locations?

Amazing that a whole page on English actor "Andrew Lynford" has no "sources" WHATSOEVER, and all it gets is the odd "citation needed", yet my input with as many references as I can find, and is, without doubt, correct, is just deleted by a plastic, fantasist, wannabe "writer" from Deludedsville. Absolute Joke!

Thanks for your research on the filming locations. I am presently collecting images of the locations on Commons, but not for all of them can I find free media. Could I persuade you to donate your pictures to Commons?

And I would like your opinion on this: I think I recognise this place, this view from the film, the scene where Poirot is walking around the island, thinking about what could have happened. He should be standing pretty much in the same place as the photographer. What do you think? --Judithcomm (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Evil Under the Sun (1982 film): though you may recognize certain locations while viewing the film, it is inappropriate to add this information to the article without a reliable source. Phrasing such as "the locations were well stitched together" are particular examples of editor opinion being weaved into the article. Even with my edits there are no citations asserting that these locations were used, or that the coordinates (!!) are accurate, but I'm assuming these are obvious to viewers of the film who are familiar with the locales, and not likely to be challenged. However your editorializing of what can or cannot be seen in the background of certain scenes is unencyclopedic and, frankly, trivial. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 19:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Where is the response to this? It's as if these inaccuracies are correct. DenbySpinks (talk) 15:01, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

THIS was answered comprehensively! The locations this idiot is referring to are self-evident, (rather like referencing the Sydney Opera House and proving that it's in Australia), and the, (nonsense stated about), 'background' was included to prove that two scenes were shot in the same place, even though they were supposed to be hundreds of miles apart, "stitched together" was a reference to that. All of which went straight over this guy's head. DenbySpinks (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Page (Motoring Journalist) (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Page (Motoring Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Page (Motoring Journalist) (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! DenbySpinks, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made a change to an article, McDonnell Douglas DC-10, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 04:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to McDonnell Douglas DC-10, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 04:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Vahey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Secret Army and Wycliffe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DenbySpinks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DenbySpinks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Look at Life (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Tim Turner have been reverted or removed because they seem to be unsubstantiated defamatory personal commentary by you. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

It isn't a 'defamatory comment' by me! I couldn't care less.

It is a comment by a third party who claims that Mr Edmonds' version of events is untrue. DenbySpinks (talk) 23:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi DenbySpinks! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Peter Edmonds that clearly was not.^[1] "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello.

Firstly, I've been editing Wiki for about 15 years on and off. I do understand about 'referencing', and how that works on Wikipedia. You've obviously never seen "Look at Life", as it's common knowledge that the series was riddled with errors, - in an age before Google/social media communication, I suppose it was forgotten before it was unearthed - but I appreciate the need for referencing, EVEN THOUGH SOME PAGES GET AWAY WITH HAVING NONE AT ALL!

As for the 'minor editing'... again, yes, it's more about spelling/punctuation etc. However, this edit DID NOT alter *meaning* of the article, merely added GENUINE context. This was within a TV documentary on the subject, but I shall attempt to find the reference online. DenbySpinks (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Nb; This page has NO REFERENCES AT ALL! DenbySpinks (talk) 22:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)