WelcomeEdit

Welcome!

Hello, Dans, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Thanks in particular for:

DYKEdit

  On 21 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Unemployment benefits in Italy, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token b18b035e5898feacd2715320ff193c1dEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Yugoslav warsEdit

Good day friend, what do you think of my edit on the lead of the Yugoslav Wars article? (Interestedinfairness (talk) 23:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)).

Would like your input here, regarding the Yugoslav wars (again):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yugoslav_wars#Recent_Changes (Interestedinfairness (talk) 01:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)).

MfD nomination of User:Dans/FutureEdit

User:Dans/Future, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dans/Future and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dans/Future during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 01:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

WP AlbaniaEdit

Afcourse I, and I think Dr. Blofeld, ZjarriRrethues and Gaius Claudius Nero are willing to help, sent them PM if you want --Vinie007 22:58, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user spaceEdit

  Hey there Dans, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Dans/Sandbox1. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Please consider restoringEdit

Re: [1] - I think the subject is notable and made a justifiable stub. If you disagree, can you bring it at WT:POLAND for further discussion? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Ditto for [2]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Francesco NulloEdit

Thanks for expanding this article. I think we can DYK it soon, but could you add inline references? Since you can read Italian, I see there are plenty of sources, including some full view books on Google Print. I have found some online Polish sources, but they are not very extensive. I will now take a break from editing this article to avoid edit conflicts. If that's fine with you, after you are done expanding and referencing the article with Italian sources, I will add the Polish ones. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:40, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

In my experience, sometimes we have no choice but to use old sources. But I will do what I can with the Polish ones shortly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
I still have one more ref to go through. Could you find the English/Italian name for his secondary school - Kolegium Biskupie Celana w Wal S. Martino, które w owym czasie uchodziło za najnowocześniejszą szkołę w całej Lombardii – Wenecji. It doesn't seem to be translated as Bishop College or Celana College...--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

T:TDYKEdit

When you create articles better than stubs, such as Italy–Poland relations, I suggest you add a few inline references and submit them to T:TDYK, so that your work can appear on Wikipedia's main page. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit summariesEdit

Hi, I have been looking at the edit history of Italy-Yugoslavia relations and found the most recent entries rather difficult and time consuming to go through due to the paucity of edit summaries. Your newest entries contain just the words "Removed duplicated map". I would draw your attention to Wikipedia: Basic copyediting, the "Edit summaries", particularly line eight, which starts "Generally speaking..."
Happy editing
RASAM (talk) 23:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Francesco NulloEdit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Giovanni RusticiEdit

You mention him here. I cannot find any ref to verify this, or anything to even prove he was notable. I suggest that if you can reference him, you move the note on him to the newly expanded battle of Krzykawka. Also, you may find this article of interest (email me if you cannot access the full version). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I am sure he is notable, but before he is mentioned in the context of Krzykawka, I'd like to see a reference for that. All I am seeing now are Wikipedia forks and mirrors :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The library website would be ok for that level of an article; does it mention Krzykawka and him being exiled to Siberia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
That's great, could you add this to the article as a proper inline cite? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Having a personal version of an articleEdit

I don't think this sort of thing is allowed, meaning having a personal version of an article and ignoring edits from other users. For example when you copy your own version into the article you wiped out all changes by others. Obviously that shouldn't happen. This would only lead to reverting between the version instead you should edit the standing article. Tüzes fal (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

I since realized that you DID took new edits into account to some degree, I'm sorry for misreading the situtation. However another user([3]) also implemented his version in the article so it's kind of confusing right now. I just hope some of my edits will be preserved as well in the end. Tüzes fal (talk) 00:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

2012 Dnipropetrovsk explosionsEdit

The reason why I removed that section was because I could see no clear connection to Tymoshenko in it. Now, I'll admit, I know next to nothing about Ukrainian politics (and when editing, I don't usually stray too far from the Formula One pages), but reading over the page at the time, there was a lot on Tymoshenko and nothing to tie it back to the explosions. In its current form, I'm not seeing anything that directly links the explosions to Tymoshenko, aside from Dnipropetrovsk being her birthplace and the photos being released. It's too circumstantial, and despite being properly referenced, its presence implies that the explosions took place as a form of protest or a political statement about Tymoshenko, but there is nothing to substantiate that implication. But I'm not going to continue to edit the page. I don't know enough about the subject - the closest I get to the Ukraine is a friend from Moldova - and don't have access a wide range of sources on the subject. I only really edited it in the first place because I saw that the page needed to be written in more-encyclopaedic terms. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 11:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

OverlinkingEdit

Hi Dans, thanks for your work. Please note that dates, years, common country-names, and common terms are not normally linked on en.WP.

Cheers. Tony (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Polje ČepićEdit

Please revert your edits and move of the article Polje Čepić to Zatka Čepić in all Wikipedia languages and side projects. As you can see in the 2011 census, in the municipality Kršan of the county of Istria there two separate settlements - Polje Čepić with 148 inhabitants, and Zatka Čepić with 31 inhabitants. Your move was unsubstantiated, it was about village Polje Čepić, and not small hamlet Zatka Čepić. Easy check of the sources used in the article, "Population" note, and its history, aim to this conclusion. Your move was without sense and reason. Zatka Čepić is so irrelevant is not even mentioned in the Istrian Encyclopedia. Return all articles and links how were previously.--Crovata (talk) 22:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

What are exact Italian official names for villages Polje Čepić, and Zatka Čepić? In Croatia by the term Felicia is considered the Čepić village, ie. Polje Čepić.--Crovata (talk) 13:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!Edit

 
Hi Dans! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:57, Wednesday, May 11, 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attributionEdit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bosnia and Herzegovina into History of Bosnia and Herzegovina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

I see by your edit to History of the Maldives you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a copyright violation. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement, or you risk being blocked from editing. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:49, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Copying from one article another without providing the required attribution is a copyright violation. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Good evening @Diannaa:. To what are you referring to, now? A bit difficult to understand if you write these criptic messages. --Dans (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
National minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, copied from Demographics of Bosnia and HerzegovinaDiannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes @Diannaa:, the demographic table is the same. The rest of the article, which is quite substantial, was written by myself. --Dans (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
I noticed that. :) Please don't forget in the future to provide the legally required attribution when copying content from one article to another in the future. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Dans. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Morten Jung-OlsenEdit

Hello. I moved your newly created article to a draft space. The new title is Draft:Morten Jung-Olsen. Based on the sources provided and based on my own searches, it seems there is not enough support for this article as biography of a living person per WP:BLP, especially given the claims made in this article. This is contentious material and all the negative claims need to be backed up by independent reliable sources, again please see WP:BLP. I have translated your references and they do not seem to be sufficient. In any case, please go through WP:AFC for release of this article. Thanks. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your edits on Boris MalagurskiEdit

Hello there,

Thanks for your edits, but it's not customary to repeat link names that have already been linked once. I reverted the edits, but don't be confused by my classification of my revert as vandalism, because that was referring to the anon that edited before you and removed sourced content. Just to be clear, I don't consider your edits to be vandalism, but I do think there is no need to link, for example, James Bissett or Michel Chossudovsky more than once. I hope we can agree on that!

Regards,

--UrbanVillager (talk) 12:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks @UrbanVillager: well understood - my edits were spurred by the fact that only some names in one list were not wikilinked; that makes it look strange. Is there any exception to the rule for when a name is cited more than once alongside others in a list? (I don't see having a name linked twice in a page as being necessarily overlinking, but this is up for debate). Thanks, --Dans (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Hm, good question, let me look into it. If you find anything on the matter in the meantime, do let me know. You've made me curious about possible exceptions as well. --UrbanVillager (talk) 19:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

List of mosques in Bosnia and HerzegovinaEdit

Hi, thank you for your edit adding context for the List of mosques in Bosnia and Herzegovina article. While it is fresh, though, could you possibly please provide a reference, hopefully as an inline citation (e.g. perhaps in format <ref>Author, ''Source title'', Date</ref>))? Either way, thanks for your contribution.

By the way, I happen to have worked on creating/developing many lists of mosques and churches. --Doncram (talk) 19:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Argh, sorry, I didn't look well enough at the edit history to see that you had just created the whole list. Thanks for creating it! Thanks also for adding a footnote there, possibly while i was making my comment here. There is something garbled about the sentence though, which needs fixing ("45% of them, of which 81% of the 1,149 mosques"?), which I would just try to fix but your source is off-line. --Doncram (talk) 20:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
No problem @Doncram:! The data and reference are lifted from the table at the bottom of Islam in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in case you wish to take a look there. Thanks, --Dans (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The sentence is still garbled and doesn't make sense. I see the table you refer to, but that is messed up too, mentioning "282" pre-war mosques of one type despite 900 having been destroyed during the war. This makes me think you don't have direct access to the source, and if so then perhaps it would be best just to provide some link to that section of the Islam in Bosnia and Herzegovina article, where the numbers may be changed/fixed later by someone else. I think the general fact of many mosques having been destroyed should be mentioned without citing the exact numbers in the list-article. --Doncram (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
@Doncram:, I've corrected the table recovering the correct numbers from bs.wiki - not a direct source but at least they add up. I'll try to streamline the sentence too. --Dans (talk) 23:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attributionEdit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Zanzibar into History of Zanzibar. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Dans. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Morten Jung-Olsen has a new commentEdit

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Morten Jung-Olsen. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Dans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Dans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Cachia CaruanaEdit

Hello Dans,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joseph Cachia Caruana for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.


Onel5969 TT me 12:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Off-siteEdit

I understand your good intentions at WT:Harassment but I think it is better to not feed that sort of thing. Accordingly I removed your post. There is nothing people at Wikipedia can do about off-site attacks on editors other than resist those who might attempt to bring the battle here. In general, if someone is concerned about outing, they should email an administrator or email the Arbitration Committee. That is not necessary in this case because they are aware of the situation. Johnuniq (talk) 22:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

OK thanks @Johnuniq: --Dans (talk) 23:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Joseph MuscatEdit

 On 14 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joseph Muscat, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Architecture of SerbiaEdit

Hi Dans, I saw your work on Milan Zloković and I appreciate it greatly. I was wondering if you could take some time to contribute to Architecture of Serbia and Serbo-Byzantine Revival? As of now, the articles are not good, they go all over the places, and Architecture of Serbia is not covering modernism, brutalism etc. cheers, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 00:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Sadko:, thanks for your kind words. So far I have been contributing mainly to Architecture of Bosnia and Herzegovina, particularly its Austro-Hungarian period. I am not an architectural expert per se, so I will take a look at what I can do in the articles you mention. Cheers, --Dans (talk) 11:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Once again, thank you for your work! I did some tweaks regarding images and I shall search for more references in the coming days. One of my ideas was that the all parts of the country should be represented and not primarily the capital. I hope that my edits work for you. cheers Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 02:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
By all means, @Sadko:! I totally agree - and that's also why I forked out the separate page Architecture of Belgrade too. Please keep up the good work :) Cheers, --Dans (talk) 08:26, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Architecture of Slovakia moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Architecture of Slovakia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 20:24, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Fundación Secretariado Gitano moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Fundación Secretariado Gitano, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Jörg Monar moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Jörg Monar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:34, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Oliver FriggieriEdit

 On 25 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Oliver Friggieri, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 08:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Safet Oručević moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Safet Oručević, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:05, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Anthony P. GaldesEdit

Greetings! I just saw that you created this page but the contents and references all seem to refer to a Francis J. Vassallo. Just thought I should let you know! Kind regards Spiderone 23:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Spiderone:. Yes, I fixed it now :) --Dans (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Very nice work, by the way! Thank you for improving Maltese coverage here. Just a tip moving forward, I have structured the references on Anthony Galdes in the usual recommended Wikipedia way. I strongly recommend using this reference template moving forward. Firstly, it's helpful for readers when you have more than one reference from the same source in the same article (e.g. more than one ToM article being used) and also, secondly, it helps prevent WP:LINKROT. Spiderone 00:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you startedEdit

Hello, Dans

Thank you for creating Elmedin Konaković.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 22:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you startedEdit

Hello, Dans

Thank you for creating Šuhret Fazlić.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please do add more sources

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Carmel Agius moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Carmel Agius, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 12:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Josef Bonnici moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Josef Bonnici, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attributionEdit

Hi. I see in a recent addition to High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Diannaa:; I wasn't sure how to do that. I will note it down for the next times! --Dans (talk) 22:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Črni bratje moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Črni bratje, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fundación Secretariado GitanoEdit

 

Hello, Dans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fundación Secretariado Gitano".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Architecture of SlovakiaEdit

  Hello, Dans. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Architecture of Slovakia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

How to deal with disruptive editorsEdit

Hi Dans, I noticed your recent RFPP for Dubravka Šuica and your post on User talk:Highspeededit and just wanted to drop you a note on how to more effectively deal with characters like this. Firstly, in this particular case, as the changes in question were done two weeks ago, their edits (which I wouldn't consider unambiguous vandalism, by the way) would be considered stale and not ripe for immediate admin attention. Secondly, if you're noticing one user in particular persistently editing a page non-constructively, WP:RFPP isn't really the appropriate venue for reporting them; generally, you would post to WP:AIV, though not in this case as the edits, as said before, are both stale and not unambiguous vandalism. Thirdly, there are several successive User talk warning messages that should be placed on any disruptive editor's talk page before reporting them anywhere in order to give them ample warning, as most administrators won't consider sanctioning them if this hasn't been done. There are several tools that simplify this process, I'd recommend looking into Twinkle or RedWarn.

Sorry for the wall of text by the way, but I do think this might be useful information to you. Have a nice day! AngryHarpytalk 10:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @AngryHarpy: for the useful suggestions, I'll check the templates. I've left a message on the user talkpage, but it is a write-only, single-purpose account, so I don't expect much from that. --Dans (talk) 10:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I did notice they've been doing this several times over the past months, so there is a small chance that the admin responding to the RFPP may just indef them out of hand, though I don't think it too likely. AngryHarpytalk 10:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Architecture of Slovakia (March 27)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ezlev was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ezlev.talk 20:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 
Hello, Dans! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ezlev.talk 20:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Ezlev:; yes, this is disappointing. The encyclopedia is missing a lot of "Architecture of <country>" articles, and "it reads more of an essay than an encyclopedia entry" is not a very helpful review. --Dans (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I apologize that my review wasn't as helpful as it could have been. I was largely reacting to the presence of phrases like "The architecture of Slovakia has a long, rich and diverse history", "the most outstanding", "a couple of hallmarks", etc; these aren't particularly neutral or encyclopedic. Another thing that caught my eye was that some bullet points and sections seem to be unsourced. While it wasn't the reason for my decline, I'm also not sure how well the use of photos conforms to WP:GALLERY. With that being said, it's clear that you've done a lot of work on this draft and that it's well on the way to becoming an article. Again, I apologize for the disappointment and for the generic decline reason. ezlev.talk 22:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks @Ezlev:; you're right, I will rework those formulas and I will try to find more sources for those sections. Cheers, --Dans (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Architecture of Slovakia has been acceptedEdit

Architecture of Slovakia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Safet OručevićEdit

  Hello, Dans. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Safet Oručević, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)