Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 18

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community.
  • The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  •   Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
  •   The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
  •   Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally,   MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Parentheses

I have no idea why you are making edits like this one, but they have no effect on the appearance of the article from the reader end, and they make it very slightly harder to see what's going on in an equation at the editor end. Please stop. --JBL (talk) 22:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I've set it so that it ignores the content of the `math` tags; outside of those, it does have an affect, but I didn't meant to be editing inside of those DannyS712 (talk) 23:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I see -- I should have had a look at your contributions to understand what was going on. Yes, absolutely, that sounds like a great solution. Thanks! --JBL (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chafin v. Chafin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chafin v. Chafin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psiĥedelisto -- Psiĥedelisto (talk) 13:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

I came across an immediate problem. Please see Talk:Chafin v. Chafin/GA1. Review is currently   on hold. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 13:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
@Psiĥedelisto: Thanks - replied at the GA page DannyS712 (talk) 19:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chafin v. Chafin

The article Chafin v. Chafin you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Chafin v. Chafin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Psi?edelisto -- Psi?edelisto (talk) 22:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Um, Legoktm, please see the above. Psiĥedelisto (talkcontribs) please always ping! 22:02, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Bot approves self-redirects

I was surprised that there is now a bot approving redirects and I tried to figure out what causes the bot to do so. In that process I realized that I made a self-redirect by accident. Technically such a self-redirect fits the tasks of the bot, but I guess these shouldn't be approved automatically. --mfb (talk) 11:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, will try to figure that one out - its unlikely to come up, and left redirects are patrolled and fixed, but makes sense to skip them. Thanks for letting me know DannyS712 (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

FYI

Hi Danny, I noticed your RemindMe script and was wondering if you were aware of the (far too useful for it to be this obscure) W-ping script, which does the same thing without making the notifications being public or adding more revisions to the database. Is that a design that you would consider as an update, or would you be willing to also link to the W-ping script on your page as a "see also"? Best, Kevin (alt of L235 · t · c) 19:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

W-ping is good, but it has a few disadvantages compared to the bot (as well as the advantages you mentioned) - the bot edits on your user talk page can trigger emails, and show up using my global watchlist script when viewing from other wikis. DannyS712 (talk) 19:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2020)

Hello, DannyS712.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Russian Academy of Natural Sciences

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Fine art • William Mariner (writer)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 July 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Enslin (entomologist)

I wrote this article which relates to a very notable entomologist as a stub. It was redirected (almost immediately) before completion. I explained this to whoever made the move suggesting a better title would be Eduard Enslin as in the authority controlled German language version. Also I worked on the draft adding a sentence or two and completing the references one of which is a very complete pdf with a full bibliography. So far with no response.Notafly (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC) PS It is not a draft but a referenced article in my subject area. I am sure this will be resolved once the text is properly considered. I can easily add the page again under Eduard Enslin from my saved draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notafly (talkcontribs) 16:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you're telling me this? --DannyS712 (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry I am very confused myself.Did you send me a speedy deletion message perhaps? This all arose from a redirect which I cannot fathom and the author of that is not responding.All I need is a decision to delete the draft he invented.Notafly (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I sent a speedy deletion message about the redirect --DannyS712 (talk) 02:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Technical Barnstar
Thank you for making so many user scripts! They are very nice to use. PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•AC) This message was left at 01:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Concerning the Al Cannon page

Hi DannyS712, just checking in to ask if you received any financial compensation for your edits to Al Cannon, the original editor Knapp84 was paid to make the page as seen here https://apps.sc.gov/PublicReporting/Expenditures/Candidate/ExpCountyFilerResult.aspx

Knapp has now revealed conflict of interest on their talk page. I am here to simply ask you if you also have a conflict, this is not meant to come with any accusatory tone, just pure fact checking. Thank you for your time JTW1998+ (talk) 20:02, 09 July 2020 (UTC)

@JTW1998+ thanks for checking. No, I did not receive any compensation DannyS712 (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

  The Invisible Barnstar
Thank you for completing 4 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 07:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2020)

 
The phrase "omakase" is most commonly used when dining at Japanese restaurants where the customer leaves it up to the chef to select and serve seasonal specialties. Pictured is omakase at a restaurant.
Hello, DannyS712.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Omakase

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Russian Academy of Natural Sciences • Fine art


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

16:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

RfA

Do you want to become an admin? I can start an RfA if you want. NASCARfan0548  16:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

@NASCARfan0548 thanks but no thanks DannyS712 (talk) 03:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

"Undersea boat" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Undersea boat. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 18#Undersea boat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know DannyS712 (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2020)

Hello, DannyS712.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Teenage rebellion

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Omakase • Russian Academy of Natural Sciences


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

FPC voter.js question

Hi DannyS712. I was wondering if you could change User:DannyS712/FPC voter.js to only display when on a subpage of WP:FPC. As far as I can tell (without bothering to test it), wrapping lines 19-22 as follows ought to work:

if (mw.config.get('wgTitle').includes('Featured picture candidates')) { // new
    mw.util.addPortletLink ( 'p-cactions', 'javascript:void(0)', 'FPC voter', 'ca-FPC-vote', 'vote'); // As before
    $('#ca-FPC-vote').on('click', function() { // As before
        FPC(); // As before
    } ); // As before
} // new

Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@Mdaniels5757   Done DannyS712 (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

19:13, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your bot

Hi Danny2712

Got to know you from you bot, i created a draft article Draft:Anna Higgs your bot has disabled a category, so my question is will the category be back after it gets approve?

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 12:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

You can revert the edit once the draft is approved, or whoever reviews it can DannyS712 (talk) 01:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

CfD bundled nom re: political parties

  Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 27#Category:Anarchist parties

Hi! In this nom, I'm looking to bundle every category under Category:Political parties by ideology that uses just "parties" instead of "political parties". Many of the categories have subcats that would be tagged as well, such as Category:Left-wing parties by country. Is this something with which your bot can assist? czar 21:51, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

So, visit Category:Political parties by ideology and recursively visit sub categories to compile a list. Each of those, if the name includes "parties" but not "political parties", suggest it be removed to replace "parties" with "political parties"? It should be possible, though I may not get to it for a bit since it'll be tricky generating the list DannyS712 (talk) 04:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, that's right! Let me know if there's something I can do to reduce the workload. If there's a tool I can use to print the full category tree, I can do the regex and de-duplication to deliver a category list. czar 03:17, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
@Czar: Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out a way to get the list recursively. I don't think I'll be able to be of much help unless you can generate the list for me, sorry DannyS712 (talk) 11:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712, would this list work? BHG recommended bundling these into the existing/aforementioned nom, if it makes sense to add this late. czar 05:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
That would work, though its a pretty big list, so I'm not sure its a good idea. DannyS712 (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
What's the best way forward then? Should I set up a separate nomination and then ping you to bundle the additional categories into it? Let me know what works best for you czar 05:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
No, I'm saying I don't think such a huge list of categories should be done at once DannyS712 (talk) 06:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

When...

When a sockmaster, whose trait is creating spoof admin accounts, decides to spoof you as Dunny721 - your time has come. The redlink awaits :-) Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

+1 to this :) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, thanks for pointing out that account. Glad to know I have fans outside of the LTAs that frequent this page DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
@Cabayi: I've got a list of hopefuls, and DannyS712's name just came up. It's a "maybe" at the moment. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Red Phoenix
  EuryalusSQL
  JujutacularMonty845RettetastMadchester

  Oversight changes

  GB fan
  KeeganOpabinia regalisPremeditated Chaos

  Guideline and policy news


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

ACC tool access request approved

 

Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and approved your request.

You may now access the interface here. Before you begin handling requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarize yourself with the process.

Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list following the instructions on that page. I also advise that you also join us on IRC #wikipedia-en-accounts connect where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and you can get real time advice on how to handle requests.

Please note failure to correctly assess requests will result in suspension of tool access. Account creation is not a race, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly. Releasing personally identifying information (such as IP and email addresses), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated very seriously and will generally result in immediate suspension.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked as "Flagged user needed" on the interface. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Account creator.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! — JJMC89(T·C) 20:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, happy to help DannyS712 (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert F. Utter

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert F. Utter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign

On 2 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kanye West is running under the Birthday Party for his 2020 presidential campaign, because "when we win, it's everybody's birthday"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much DannyS712 (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
@Cwmhiraeth: Do article creators not receive credit, is it only nominators? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 18:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712: I wanted to let you know that the article has been added to WP:DYKSTATS for receiving over 5,000 views. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 18:16, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nice4What: Doing some investigation, I see there were two credits for the nomination, but at some stage the hook was moved from one prep set to another, and one of the credits was left behind. I will add the credit to your talk page, but I do not think it will be recorded by the DYK bot. Sorry about that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

Taking over my scripts

Hello DannyS712,
I was wondering if you take over maintaining my user scripts, User:Interstellarity/Semi-protected edit requests.js and User:Interstellarity/Extended-protected edit requests.js which add the links to the sidebar. I am not the best at user scripts so I would like to someone competent in that field to maintain them. Thanks, Interstellarity (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

PS: I am looking for editors to add something to Wikipedia:Editor advice for newcomers. If you want to contribute there, your input is appreciated. Interstellarity (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
@Interstellarity: Sorry, but I'd rather not DannyS712 (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

15:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Leionema equestre

Just out of interest - why did you set this to unreviewed? Can't find anything wrong with the article... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Oh, bah, disregard. Isingness. Well, this one looks good :) Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

16:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

{{Source assess table}} updated

I've added an optional parameter to this template to specify the editor who prepared the table – you may want to account for it in your script. Cheers, —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 17:22, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know DannyS712 (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Content moved from mainspace to draftspace

Hi, please have DannyS712bot ignore Category:Content moved from mainspace to draftspace when decategorizing drafts. Thanks. BD2412 T 18:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Is this still needed now that it uses a template? DannyS712 (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
I would think not, although there is some disconsternation over the used of the template. BD2412 T 01:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Clean

Hi. I believe the Gudban article has been placed on listing for a little too long. Is it possible for you to clean it up, or if not, give me some tips on what I could do to somehow speed up the process? Thank you. Auxerre dejufan (talk) 19:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation DannyS712 (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:British_Art_Medal_Society

Hello DannyS712,

In the 28th June you declined my submission for an article on The British Art Medal Society and made some every helpful suggestions in how I could improve it. I think I have done all that you have asked, though probably not to the standard that you may expect from someone a novice.

I was just wondering what the next steps are, and how I can get the article approved? I appreciate that there appears to be a very large queue that seems to be getting longer and longer ever time I look! Any handy hints and advice welcome.

With best wishes

Schnoebi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnoebi (talkcontribs) 14:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Indeed, there is a fairly large queue, so I'm not sure when it'll be reviewed, sorry DannyS712 (talk) 20:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Reconstruction Amendments

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reconstruction Amendments you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 03:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Reconstruction Amendments

The article Reconstruction Amendments you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Reconstruction Amendments for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Mz7: thanks for the detailed explanation. To be honest, I forgot that I nominated the article, but I'll be sure to expand the sourcing DannyS712 (talk) 05:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Remove content

You said you removed the content I posted. Why and what content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zooanimals35 (talkcontribs) 22:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I removed the links you added. They were not appropriate to add like that --DannyS712 (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Redirecting "High Score" to "High Score (disambugation)

Since you undid my initial move per WP:RMUM, I wrote my reasoning for my initial move in the Talk:High Score. My rationale was that high score (the lowercase version) redirected to Score (game)#High score. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 00:42, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll take a look when I get a chance DannyS712 (talk) 01:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian football defender, 1999 births stubs

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Russian football defender, 1999 births stubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've fixed the relevant stub template to restore the categorization DannyS712 (talk) 19:32, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:User 2fa

 Template:User 2fa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 154.5.234.189 (talk) 21:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know DannyS712 (talk) 00:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

User talk:DannyS712/EFFPRH.js

Mind if I do it? Clearing out all my old notifications :) Enterprisey (talk!) 07:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Go ahead, thanks. I've been neglecting my scripts due to real-life commitments and other, more exciting, on wiki activities, and hadn't gotten around to it. Thanks so much DannyS712 (talk) 10:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  •   Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
  •  HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
  •   Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Adding Templates for nomination

Can the bot add templates to a group of related categories for renaming? I'm deciding whether to ask help from Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion or from you in nominating the categories.Manabimasu (talk) 05:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Manabimasu yes, I just need a list of the categories and to know what to tag them with (i.e. what they should be renamed to) DannyS712 (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: I can give you the two parent categories. There are many subcategories I can’t list off. These subcategories and parent categories contain the phrase say “X” and I want to change X to Y. When using this template {{subst:Cfr2|Current category|Proposed name|text=Your reason(s) for the proposed rename.}}. Proposed name parameter changes from subcategory to subcategory, so if one category is “X W" and another is "X Z". Your bot has to identify X and tag with a proposed name specific to that subcategory so "Y W" and "Y Z". Finally and not necessarily your bot has to list the categories it has tagged in this format


* 1st category
* 2nd category
...



, so I or and editor can easily create the bundled cfd section. Is your bot capable of that?Manabimasu (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

cfr2 is used for the entry on the cfd page, not for the tagging. What are the "X" and "Y", and what are the parent categories? DannyS712 (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: Yeah, I meant {{subst:cfr|Proposed name|CfD section name}} So you bot is up to it? These are two large parent categories.Manabimasu (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
That depends - what are the "X" and "Y" and what are the parent categories? DannyS712 (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@DannyS712:The two parent categories are Category:Roman Catholics and Category:Roman Catholic dioceses. The X is “Roman Catholic" and the Y or proposed name is "Latin Catholic".Manabimasu (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Given how many of the sub categories have their own subcategories, and so on, I would need a full list of what should be tagged DannyS712 (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: I was thinking the bot would figure it out. You know any tools that can list recursively all the subcategories and so on.Manabimasu (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: I have a few more similar parent categories. Can your bot use Special:PrefixIndex or Special:CategoryTree?Manabimasu (talk) 16:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
No, sorry. Without a list of the categories to tag I can't help you DannyS712 (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: What format should the list be?Manabimasu (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Ideally, a list of links to the categories DannyS712 (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for informing meManabimasu (talk) 03:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Input

I talked to User:Nihiltres who created Module:Hatnote group, but I want to ask you on what you think about Module:Footnote group. This template's documentation Template:Footnote_group gives an idea of how it will work. The main purpose of it is to merge two footnote template or more. I am unsure how <ref> tags are rendered by mediawiki.Manabimasu (talk) 05:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

  • @Manabimasu:, the template you are trying to create cannot possibly work. Lua runs after <ref> tags have been (partially) expanded; in the text Lua receives there'll be a replacement string, something like "UNIQ--ref-00000002-QINU", where the tag used to be. {{hatnote group}} works on hatnotes because Lua runs after templates are expanded, and it operates on the output of those hatnote templates. Your idea must operate on the input of reference tags when it does not have access to that input, but only a mid-parsing placeholder. It's a neat idea, but it's not (currently?) technically possible. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 06:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Eddie891
  AngelaJcw69Just ChillingPhilg88Viajero

  CheckUser changes

  SQL

  Guideline and policy news

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Source assess table

Curious why you don't want your script linked from the template – I think a lot of editors find it useful. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 17:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Sure, but imo templates shouldn't be used to advertise specific users' scripts. If it was a gadget, maybe DannyS712 (talk) 20:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
That's an interesting thought – think we might have any success trying to get the script approved as a gadget? —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 13:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm planning on rewriting it at some point first DannyS712 (talk) 13:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Sounds good, ping me when you do please! —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 15:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Thanks so much DannyS712 (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Add a ping to DNC

Hi Danny

Long time no speak. Hope you are well in these tough times.

I have recently cleaned up the content category tree by removing lots of template categories and other project categories, so I can now use Petscan to find pages in the user and user talk namespaces (described at WT:Categorization#The_cleanup_which_is_possible_now_that_templates_have_been_removed_from_many_content_categories).

Most of those are user sandboxes, which can be easily fixed in one click by using your very handy User:DannyS712/Draft no cat.

However, today I spotted one such page where the user had again added live categories to a page which I had converted to links only yesterday. I assume that this was a good faith effort by them as they created a new draft, and that they probably had not spotted my DNC fix.

So I thought it would be helpful to add a ping when DNC is used in the User namespace. I have forked DNC to User:BrownHairedGirl/Draft no cat.js (permalink), and added some code which generates the ping. I tested it on an ancient sandbox draft in my own userspace[37], and it seems to be working fine.

Would you feel able to incorporate this in the live version of DNC?

Obviously you're a much better coder than me, so you may code it differently. But I think it is a useful enhancement. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: Hey. That's a good idea, though I think mw.config.get( 'wgRelevantUserName' ) should be enough to get the relevant user's name, rather than the regex replacement of the page title. I'll take a look at adding this in shortly DannyS712 (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, Danny. It seems that I was right to guess that you would find a more elegant way of coding it! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  Done. I also really need to rewrite that script at some point DannyS712 (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the update, @DannyS712.

Just a wee afterthought: would it be better to pipe the ping link?

It's currently: DNC_summary = '@[[User:' + username + ']]: ' + DNC_summary ... which displays as per my original hack.

But maybe it would be better as DNC_summary = '@[[User:' + username + '|' + username + ']]: ' + DNC_summary

--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done DannyS712 (talk) 21:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks, Danny. That script saves me hours of time every week. It's a really valuable tool. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
After I clean it up, maybe I should propose it as a gadget? DannyS712 (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Robert F. Utter

The article Robert F. Utter you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Robert F. Utter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Hog Farm, because Legobot has decided not to function. Hog Farm Bacon 14:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

"Message delivered by Hog Farm, because Legobot has decided not to function." - that just made my day. Thanks so much for the review DannyS712 (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Clock gadget

Hi, Danny, hope you are fine. I was here for your help. You know that a there is a gadget present in the preferences that displays current time in UTC near logout button. However, I wanted to change its time zone according to my time zone (UTC +5). Do you know how to do that? I tried to paste the code window.LiveClockTimeZone = 'local'; in my Special:MyPage/common.js but the time doesn't changes. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 11:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

See mw:MediaWiki talk:Gadget-UTCLiveClock.js#Time zones DannyS712 (talk) 14:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
I saw and and I tried to do it. I changed location multiple times but nothing changed. I pasted these codes in my common.js by enabling it as a gadget from the preferences. My time zone is 'Pakistan/Islamabad' (UTC +5). Should the codes be added to a new js page. Empire AS Talk! 04:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Pakistan/Islamabad is not a valid timezone. Please try with one that is listed at List of tz database time zones DannyS712 (talk) 05:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Still not working. See User:Empire AS/common.js where I've pasted this line with a timezone from the list you suggested. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 01:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Well, your common.js might not be working because of a problem with the code lower down. You commented out mw.util.addPortletLink( but not the rest of the method call, so lines 15-22 might be causing the problem. Suggest commenting those out as well DannyS712 (talk) 01:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes, it started working now after removing two slashes from top. But what was the problem in js. Two slashes are used to disable a script and I also disabled it by two slashes. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 01:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
The issue is that you only commented out the first line, and the other lines were still being run DannyS712 (talk) 01:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Importing a Template to Fanon Wiki

Hello, I'm SkyGuy94. I was wondering if You could help with something. I want to import the traditional Mongolian script template to Fanon Wiki, where I am an active user. The current method I'm using on Fanon Wiki – <span style="writing-mode:tb-rl"></span> – results in the mongol script I use to be aligned this "ᠵᠢᠱᠢᠶ᠎ᠡ ᠲᠧᠺᠰᠲ". As you can see, while the text is in the right direction, the bottom end of the text is aligned to the bottom of the line and ascending upwards instead of the top end being aligned to the top of the line and descending downwards. That just doesn't look authentic. Is there any way to properly import the template and all its components to Fanon wiki. I'd try to do it myself, but my programing skills are far below mediocre and I'm worried I'd mess it up if I tried. --SkyGuy94 (talk) 22:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Not sure, sorry. Maybe ask at WP:VPT? DannyS712 (talk) 22:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
 

 

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - September 2020

Hello, DannyS712! Here is the September 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Thegooduser FYI you included the subject heading twice. It should only be included in the subject of the mass message, not also as part of the message content DannyS712 (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
All fixed now :) --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Please reopen

Your closure was controversial WP:BADNAC. Reopen or I will challenge this at deletion review. Lightburst (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Given that Wikipedia:Speedy keep is extremely clear about what to do for articles linked to on the main page, I disagree that this is a bad close. Had you waited longer than 10 minutes before opening a deletion review, we could have discussed this, per Wikipedia:Deletion review#Instructions - "Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision."
However, since you have already opened a deletion review, and since the topic and the AfD is clearly controversial, I'm willing to revert my close. Instead I'll just comment that it should be speedy kept per the guidelines.
In the future please allow editors more time to respond to such a post before you proceed with opening a deletion review. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
@Lightburst: May I inquire as to what part of speedy keep criteria 6 doesn't apply here? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Lightburst (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know; see above for my response DannyS712 (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Robert F. Utter

On 26 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert F. Utter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Utter resigned from the Washington Supreme Court in protest of the death penalty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert F. Utter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert F. Utter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much DannyS712 (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

X-Calibur

The X-Calibur article is open for edits to help it conform to Wikipedia’s standards, but there are a plethora of references that are cited in the draft.

I’m trying to create a historical record for the artist X-Calibur, not a promotional article. Please help me do this, by not deleting my draft, but in helping me edit it so it does become a published article that meets the community standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanunityproductions (talkcontribs) 05:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your user page suggests that you have a conflict of interest. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest DannyS712 (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Jaswant Singh

On 27 September 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jaswant Singh, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much --DannyS712 (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

RM helper

Hello, Is it possible to have a script created that will help over at RM just like XFD closure, it should be able to relist, close, fix links , log the RM at the articles talk page and move the page if necessary. This would really help since we do things over there manually Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 15:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Maybe, but I wouldn't be able to get to it in the short term DannyS712 (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
I actually learnt there is a script similar to this proposal at user:Danski454/RMcloser.js but it’s not working Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 14:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020 GAN Backlog drive!

-- Eddie891 Talk Work 16:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AjpolinoLuK3
  Jackmcbarn
  Ad OrientemHarejLidLomnMentoz86Oliver PereiraXJaM
  There'sNoTimeTheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:2605:A000:1133:810F:3DE0:A0D6:62A0:6B6E

Hello DannyS712. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:2605:A000:1133:810F:3DE0:A0D6:62A0:6B6E, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: U2 specifically excludes "user pages for IP users who have edited". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 05:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jackmcbarn I believe this falls under G6 though - {{IPsock}} might be valid for IP user pages, but the current content is useless DannyS712 (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The criteria for speedy deletion are meant to be narrowly construed, and I don't think "the current content is useless" fits. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Sure, I understand. Any objection to me nominating at MfD? DannyS712 (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Go for it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
@Jackmcbarn see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:2605:A000:1133:810F:3DE0:A0D6:62A0:6B6E DannyS712 (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Late onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia - too technical

You have added a "too technical" template on the page Late onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia in 2019. We have edited the page since then. Is it still too technical? If yes, can you point out the places that we can rewrite? Otherwise, can you please remove the template? ---Maxim Masiutin (talk) 16:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

@Maxim Masiutin: If you believe that it is no longer too technical, you can remove the tag yourself. DannyS712 (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: Thank you! I will remove it then. ---Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Breaking categorization cycles

   You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:SDZeroBot/Category cycles. —⁠andrybak (talk) 18:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know DannyS712 (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Influencer Marketing Hub

Hello, DannyS712! Please, let me know more in detail how to improve the draft on "Influencer Marketing Hub" - it looks like the nature and the main occupation of the company is "advertising" and "marketing", so I'd be happy to hear how to align this draft with the most stringent Wikipedia standards for neutrality. I'd appreciate your help and knowledge. With regard --Ronnyprone777 (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The issue isn't that it is about an advertising company, but that it reads like an advertisement for the company. Extra help is available at the AfC help desk, Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk DannyS712 (talk) 22:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Neologisms CFD request

Could you please tag the categories listed in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 4 § Neologisms, words and phases introduced in time periods with the bot? Thanks. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

I've been having some trouble and will probably not be able to do that in the short term, sorry DannyS712 (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
No problem. In this specific case, I've figured out a way to do it manually using substitutions of Template:Title year and Template:Title decade. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Question about overwrite editing when CE

Hi, Danny - I was just wondering if it's possible to make copy editing one's own comment real-time? IOW - my original post misspelled something, or wasn't clear, and I go back to correct it, but instead of correcting the original, it creates a new diff. The problem arises when the old diff is used instead of the new diff, and it could result in an editor being blocked or t-banned, especially if the editor doesn't remember or think about the fact they corrected it. Does that make sense? Maybe set a time limit for realtime corrections? FB allows such editing, and changes the comment in real time. Atsme Talk 📧 18:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

 
Example of revision history but keeping same diff #
I'm not sure I fully understand your question, but once an edit is saved the only way to correct the original would be (as far as I know) to manually change the contents of the database for the revision in question, which is just not done. DannyS712 (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
   I compose a comment, click preview & fail to see any issues so I click publish. At that point, a diff is created. I come back to that post some time later, and realize that I misspelled a word, or that my comment might be misconstrued. I copy edit, and a new diff is created. My question is, can we keep the same diff #, or just add the revisions to the edited version without creating an entirely different diff - maybe append the edit with a v.1 or v.2, something along that line? When gathering diffs for whatever reason, we don't always know that particular comment was updated or copyedited, etc. because a new diff is created. I think it would be useful to see the edit/revision history of a specific comment kept in the same place. Also, when gathering diffs as evidence, an editor might grab an old version that was updated and not know it. I think Wbm1058 writes code or something along that line so I've pinged him to see if he can provide some input. I'd like to know if something like this is even possible before I add it to the WMF wish list. Atsme Talk 📧 22:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
@Atsme: diff numbers refer to the revisions, and so cannot be changed (I don't know about Wbm1058, but I've written hundreds of patches to mediawiki core, and haven't heard about anything like this) DannyS712 (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Well yes, currently a revision cannot be changed, but this should be technically possible. The devil may be in the details, though. I think the phpbb software allows this. After I post a message in a forum using this software I can make spelling corrections to the same message. It would make sense to set a time limit on this (maybe a minute or two), and only allow such changes if they were made to the most recent edit on the page. The revision would maintain the same revision ID. There would be no record kept of the original version of the edit as only one version is retained for a given revision ID. This would allow someone to fix a bad edit where they accidentally (unintentionally) saved an edit while they were still in preview mode. – wbm1058 (talk) 22:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
@Wbm1058: Ah, okay, so this is a request for a feature to edit existing revisions. I doubt that it would be accepted as a feature request / implemented in core, but it certainly does sound interesting DannyS712 (talk) 22:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Or give anyone, not just administrators, the power to delete a single edit that they made if it's the most recent edit on a page, within a reasonably small time window. Or course you can't delete just one edit currently. On a page with 1,000 edits you need to delete the whole page, then restore 999 edits. Which is a pain, both for the editor and the software performing this resource-intensive operation. It makes history-merging a more tedious procedure. – wbm1058 (talk) 22:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you, Wbm1058. If only I could have explained it that simply.   Facepalm Sorry about that, Danny. Atsme Talk 📧 22:53, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

LTA Kremlingraves?

What LTA do you think this is? Ridinghightide and Janjoness are similar non-constructive talk page editors from the past few hours, but there wasn't quite enough for me to file a sock report. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Pretty sure its GRP, based on their edits on simplewiki DannyS712 (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Ah, makes sense. I didn't think of cross-wiki issues. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
I only noticed the enwiki edits after blocking on simple DannyS712 (talk) 02:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, DannyS712

Thank you for creating October 2020 Afghanistan attacks.

User:TimothyBlue, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Greetings. I wanted to thank you for creating October 2020 Afghanistan attacks and let you know I marked it as reviewed. I hope you are able to find more sources for the individual attacks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TimothyBlue}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

  // Timothy :: talk  18:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, I didn't review it though, I unreviewed it - bug? DannyS712 (talk) 19:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Reply

Hey Danny, are you using mw:Talk pages project/replying? ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Yes (or at least I was, it seems the js hack no longer works) DannyS712 (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Wow! can't wait to get a hand on this tool; they should allow some users to use this on enwiki (for testing purposes). ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
If you add dtenable=1 to the url you can try it now DannyS712 (talk) 12:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
It doesn't seem to be working for me. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, not sure then, sorry DannyS712 (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Got it working!!! Thanks mate! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-October 2020

Hello, DannyS712! Here is the October 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

About SectionMover

Straightforward request: can you make an option to copy section too? Enjoyer of World💬 09:29, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

No idea, but I'll look into it DannyS712 (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is   Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by   Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points.   The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with   Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were   Hog Farm (submissions),   HaEr48 (submissions),   Harrias (submissions) and   Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

DiscussionCloser adding excess blank lines

Hey there! First of all, thank you so much for DiscussionCloser - it's such a helpful script. I've noticed though that it adds quite a few excess blank lines between the bottom of the starting closing template and the discussion being closed. Any idea why this might be occurring? ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 10:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Well, I didn't make it, and I'm planning to rewrite it at some point, but I can poke around and see if I can figure out why DannyS712 (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
@DannyS712: Oh. Anyways, if you wouldn't mind, I'd really appreciate it. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 09:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request DannyS712 bot III 72

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot III 72 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 15:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

(note to self) replied on the brfa DannyS712 (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested ping

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dandy Jackson Chukwudi. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Barkeep49: thanks, deleted on wikidata as well DannyS712 (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:25, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm not really interested in the discussion DannyS712 (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)