User talk:Courcelles/Archive 110

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #172
Archive 105 Archive 108 Archive 109 Archive 110 Archive 111 Archive 112 Archive 115

Information on how to proceed to have removal of a ban considered

Courcelles:

I am presently bound by an old ban that arose over controversy concerning the article Speed of light. This ban has led in recent years to actions brought by my addition of "See also" links, corrections of typos and other infractions of the ban that are not germane to disruption of WP. I think it may be time to broach the rescinding of this ban, and hope you can spell out how that can be done. I also would appreciate any advice you might have about the process.

Thanks for any help you can offer. Brews ohare (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

The only way to do this is to file a request at WP:ARCA, though I'm not sure it would go anywhere given last week's AE thread. Were I you, I'd wait a few months and file a request. Courcelles (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Why did you have to make an issue out of it when it was clear that I had already settled on this account and was using it exclusively, per WP:VALIDALT; "Clean start under a new name"? There was no disruption being caused. It did not violate WP:SOCK as there was no intent to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt. You could have just left it alone and it wouldn't have been a problem. Instead, you made an issue out of something so minor and non-disruptive and sullied this accounts reputation forever. I took a very long time to settle on this username and you ruined it. My Little Question Can't be This Interesting (talk) 23:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

You were using 18 accounts, all to edit the same pages. Courcelles (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Vacation

Saw you folks were headed out, and just wanted to drop a "have a good time" note. Leaving on the 12th myself for a while. Stay safe. — Ched :  ?  22:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Have fun! OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 15:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #153

16:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Kohs vandalism

Hi. In this post at Wikipediocracy, Greg links to this Google spreadsheet which appears to list the diffs for all of his experimental vandalism. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April 29: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Wednesday April 29, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our inaugural evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

After the main meeting, pizza and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Featuring a keynote talk this month on Lady Librarians & Feminist Epistemologies! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #154

15:30, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

pls unprotect my page

this is ms weir here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.185.135.199 (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #155

15:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

University of Canterbury

You semi-protected University of Canterbury in January and blocked several accounts as {{checkuserblock-account}}. The semi expired recently and a new account started making the same edits so I have blocked it and renewed the protection. You might like to confirm the link between Bblblstr (talk · contribs) and the earlier accounts.-gadfium 19:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll take a look when I'm home on Tuesday. Checkyser and on my phone in a foreign country is not going to work in any useful manner. Courcelles (talk) 09:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Block looks good to me, but can't find any sleepers. Courcelles (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks.-gadfium 21:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Bom dia e bemvindo

I hope you enjoyed your holiday. There has been zero vandalism on Valentine's Day since it was unprotected apart from one contribution by our Brazilian friend. As both Passover and Easter are out of the way for another year please unprotect Easter. See the discussion at User talk:Lankiveil/Archive 9#Easter. 156.61.250.250 (talk) 10:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

Trouble at Standard penetration test

Hi! Can you stop by Standard penetration test and have a look at the edits User:Yoshi123Yoshi has been making? I've tried to explain to him that he's placing undue weight on the material he wants to include, and that it's better to just summarize it and add it further down. Then he goes and adds it all back again. We're getting close to 3rr territory. Argyriou (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Also, unrelated except that it's hit the same article, someone from geotechdata.info has been spamming various articles related to geotechnical engineering. I've warned User talk:212.243.35.196, but this has been going on a while (I found another edit about a year old), from various IP addresses. Is there something that can be done other than just going through and cleaning up? Argyriou (talk) 04:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Seems like a matter for ANI to me. I just don't really have the time in the next 36 hours to deal with anything extra, sorry. Courcelles (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I went to ANI about the spam, and Geni is now aware of that problem. Do you have any recommendation or advice about the other issue, which is much more a good-faith content dispute? Argyriou (talk) 17:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #156

FYI

You checkuser-blocked Mrashid364 back in January. I've just indef'd Johndavid786 as a sock after an AIV report. Just thought you might want to look into it; I'm not familiar with the background, but the behavioural evidence is pretty conclusive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

No sleepers (would have been unlikely to find any though, for reasons) Courcelles (talk) 01:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

15:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter

 
C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) is a long-period comet discovered on 17 August 2014 by Terry Lovejoy; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by   The Herald (submissions) during the second round.

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was   Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 16:28, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
  • New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
  • Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter



MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion

You have been cordially invited to discuss Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gymnastics#Major competitions and medal records for athletes following this and this discussions. Thanks for your quick and prompt response. --Osplace 13:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #157

15:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

June 10: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting

Wednesday June 10, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our next evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

This month will also feature on our agenda: recent and upcoming editathons, the organization's Annual Meeting, and Chapter board elections.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

After the main meeting, pizza and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Featuring a keynote talk this month to be determined! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 16:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

MIDDAYEXPRESS: supposed involvement in MUSLIM TERRORISM SUPPORT

Middayexpress is supporting Al-Shabaab?


Hi, I have read that you blocked user:Middayexpress in 2011. But this user is becoming more and more "a real problem" and should be blocked again. Anyway, I want to add the following information, in case you want to investigate the "Al-Shabaab-ISIS" issue & presence on Wikipedia. This investigation is being done even on the blog of Mappista59 (read: https://www.blogger.com/profile/17629549463392207787 ). Thanks anyway:


User:Middayexpress is a controversial user of English Wikipedia.

She is a Somali woman (according to user Chuckupd and others) living in the UK, probably in London, who is accused to be with "pathological behavior" while controlling in en.wiki all articles on Somalia. She has caused to abandon Wikipedia at least one user (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chuckupd), who wrote that "I'm not the only one being attacked (by Middayexpress) without mercy" and "Middayexpress, you are hopelessly insane " and finally "I give up on Wikipedia. Middayexpress has accused me with so many lies that it has become unbearably depressing. I'm not the only one being attacked without mercy. One of these days, I hope she will be banned and then I might consider returning here."


Another wiki user (Buckshot06 (talk) ) wrote that "Middayexpress is in long-standing, continual violation of WP:NPOV, continually rolls back edits that do not reflect his views (IDONTLIKEIT/Disruptive editing, plus WP:UNDUE over-positive views of the Somali situation), and continually attempts to WP:OWN a wide range of Somalia articles." And this statement was supported by User:Bobrayner, who wrote that "I share Buckshot06's concerns. However, I feel the problem may be more widespread, as I have seen Middayexpress doing the same kind of pov-pushing on other articles related to Somalia and the surrounding region".


Buckshot06 wrote (on 17 February 2014): "Middayexpress, I remain increasingly concerned about your distortions of sources in both these articles. Beyond the issue of the TFG's security forces in Mogadishu in December 2006-January 2007, these include putting words in the mouth of a senior Ethiopian official, who did not say that Ethiopia had 8,000 troops in Somalia in November 2013, distorting a meeting between Italian and Somali officials in 2012 into a claim that Somali had started rebuilding its air force in 2000-2010, and inventing aircraft numbers and entire aircraft from the Library of Congress Country Study. Why do you continually readd the SM-1019s that are not listed in the Country Study?".....and user Nick-D (talk) added:" I've noticed that your edits to these articles seem to put an unduly positive "spin" on things. For instance, in your most recent edit to the Somali Civil War article [1] you removed material sourced to a January 2013 academic journal article by Laura Hammond in which she argued that "[M]uch of rural Somalia remains in the hands of Al-Shabaab" and replaced it with more positive material sourced to a November 2012 news story which argues that 85% of the country was under government control at the time. You did not provide a rationale for this change (especially removing material outright rather than noting differing viewpoints) and I'm wondering why you made this change?"


User:Gobonobo added the negative comments that "Middayexpress can be a difficult editor to work with. Middayexpress tends to exert ownership over Somalia-related articles, employing an editing style that is combative and adversarial, often refactoring other's contributions and/or edit-warring to preserve their preferred version of an article. Sometimes Middayexpress exhibits tendentious behavior, removing sourced material that is critical of Somalia or Somali people". Additionally User:StoneProphet pinpointed that Middayexpress did "rampant cherry-picking of sources and content".


Middaexpress had fights from his first wiki-moments even with admins (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kwamikagami/old , who accused Middayexpress of "violating basic Wikipedia policy") and with many other users.


Middayexpress has even insulted users, like User:Sherurcij, who was called "racist" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somalia_Affair&action=historysubmit&diff=303950062&oldid=303948740 ).


Middayexpress was "restricted" from posting by admin EdJohnston for some months in June 2010, after an edit-warring with user StoneProphet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Middayexpress/Archive_11).


User Baboon43 (talk) accused Middayexpress of meatpuppetry in a sockpuppet investigation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Runehelmet/Archive ). He wrote:

"Middayexpress is a meatpuppet master for Runehelmet as seen on Runehelmets talk page once middayexpress began into a dispute with me he went over to call runehelmet into the discussion 27 and rune also does the same vice versa 28..These two individuals would rather have a page dominated by somali-centric material and seem to turn a blind eye on other ethnic groups as seen here 29..Gyrofrog does not enter discussion on a wide scale like Runehelmet does so that is not comparable..If an editor pushes pov and seems to take your side in a discussion always and you go invite him then that is not acceptable..also your example about you and runehelmet disagreeing on article doesnt matter because that article is strictly somali oriented(squabbling in your own pot)..runehelmet would rather tag team if possible based on his behavior & he prefers to tag team strictly with Middayexpress....User Runehelmet also seems like a meatpuppet for User_talk:Middayexpress as clearly seen on runehelmets talk page [6]..midday passes on articles for runehelmet to add on his watchlist clearing way for both users to appear on WP:OBSART and wp:CAN..it seems other users have brought up their behavior in previous discussion 7..middayexpress invites runehelmet to discussions which is also clearly seen on the talk page..they back each other to push consensus seen here [8] & [9]..also the only time Runehelmet seems to accept consensus in a dispute is if middayexpress enters the discussion as seen here [10] & [11]" Baboon43 (talk) 09:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC). Furthermore, it seems that user AcidSnow is a "meatpuppet" of Middayexpress, because he always defends her POVs in all the Somalia discussions and "fights".


User:Bricology found that Middaexpress was "hiding it in a long, dense and relatively undifferentiated timeline" the issue of poaching as a source of funds for the Somalian terrorist group Al-Shabaab. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al-Shabaab_(militant_group)#Moving_on...). He even wrote: "Middayexpress, you either presume that you have the power to unilaterally change other editors' work or you misunderstand the relevant issue, or both".


This tentative to "help" the image of Al-Shabaab in Wikipedia (similar to the one denounced by user Nick-D ) raises doubts, and creates the possibility that Middayexpress has a supposed involvement in Muslim terrorism support. Indeed she has an astonishing knowledge of Al-Shabaab activity in the last years: this knowledge can only be possessed by an insider (or a closely-related insider) of this terrorist organization!


Furthermore, Middayexpress has shown a "fanatical hate" (similar to the one of members of Al-Shabaab) against Christianity in Somalia, as is clearly evidenced from her cancellation of serious bibliography and data in the voice "Roman Catholicism in Somalia" (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_Catholicism_in_Somalia&oldid=320544261): she has made disappear that "The Bishop of Mogadishu, Franco Filippini, declared in 1940 that there were about 40,000 Somali Catholics due to the work of missionaries in the rural regions of Juba and Shebelle, but WWII damaged in an irreversibly way most of the catholic missions in Italian Somalia.[1] ". She angrily (as a possible al-Shabaab member or sympathizer) denied her POV-caused disappearances (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roman_Catholicism_in_Somalia&oldid=320948362).


Middayexpress even attacked with continuous "malignity" user Oldsettler accusing him of sockpuppetry until she obtained the help of "wikimafia" user Vituzzu: she wanted and obtained to "decapitate without pity in Wikipedia" Oldsettler with the same kind of malignity & hate shown in Syria by ISIS terrorists. Oldsettler wrote "The malignity of this Middayexpress is unbelievable. Why against me? I have never done anything with him/her or against him/her, but -after obtaining to erase my dad's photo- now attacks me continuously repeating the same accusations again and again and again with his/her typical "byzantine phrases" full of the same things. I have read his/her 60 archives and I have found that he/she is a Somalian living in the UK (probably in the London area full of supporters of ISIS (read [46]) and that he/she has had "fightings" with many wikipedians. He/she has collected many blocks and menaces of blocks for his/her continuous edit-warrings and seems to promote muslim POVs in a way that remembers the religious fanatism: most important to me, he/she seems to "hate" colonialism and western colonialists, so probably he/she identifies me with the Italians who colonized Somalia....and this can explain his/her attacks against me."


Furthermore Vituzzu is known in the Italian wiki as one of the main bosses of the “Italian wikimafia”. Some websites denounce him, like “Wikiperle” (read in Italian : htp://wikiperle.blogspot.com/2013/05/wikipedia-mai-criticare-la-famiglia.html) and “Perle Complottiste” (read: http://complottismo.blogspot.com/search/label/Vituzzu?max-results=100 ) and so do many Italian wikiusers (read in Italian: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Amministratori/Riconferma_annuale/Vituzzu/3 ; http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Amministratori/Riconferma_annuale/Archivio/Archivio_riconferme_tacite/2012#Vituzzu ; http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Amministratori/Riconferma_annuale/Archivio/Archivio_riconferme_tacite/2013#Vituzzu ).

Vituzzu -he is from Calabria, the home of Ndrangheta (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2015/02/150224083921277.html)- has even been "blocked" many times in the Italian Wikipedia, even if he is an admin, and "strangely" survived without ever being banned (http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl… ): but this could only be possible because of his powerful "mafia" relationships!).


This help from wikimafia Vituzzu could or seems to be related to the growing relationship between muslim terrorism organizations and the mafia against & inside the Christian Western industrial societies (http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:PZMgorG2ojMJ:www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201211/20121127ATT56707/20121127ATT56707EN.pdf+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us): may be it is even related -as a clear possible proof- to the Middayexpress supposed involvement in Muslim terrorism support. Also a possible link to Al-Kaeda cannot be excluded, because of the growing contacts between Somalian Al-Shabaab and ISIS (read: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/24/isis-reaches-out-to-somali-terror-group-al-shabaab/ ).


Indeed in London, between some members of the huge Somalian community, there it is a growing "hidden" support for Al-Shabaab; and Middaexpress seems to live there (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2964218/Somali-terror-group-Al-Shabaab-calls-Westgate-style-shopping-centre-attack-London-s-Oxford-Street-chilling-new-video.html ).


If interested in further in formation, please go to http://www.trackingterrorism.org/group/north-london-boys — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.184.202 (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Support request with team editing experiment project

Dear tech ambassadors, instead of spamming the Village Pump of each Wikipedia about my tiny project proposal for researching team editing (see here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Research_team_editing), I have decided to leave to your own discretion if the matter is relevant enough to inform a wider audience already. I would appreciate if you could appraise if the Wikipedia community you are more familiar with could have interest in testing group editing "on their own grounds" and with their own guidance. In a nutshell: it consists in editing pages as a group instead of as an individual. This social experiment might involve redefining some aspects of the workflow we are all used to, with the hope of creating a more friendly and collaborative environment since editing under a group umbrella creates less social exposure than traditional "individual editing". I send you this message also as a proof that the Inspire Campaign is already gearing up. As said I would appreciate of *you* just a comment on the talk page/endorsement of my project noting your general perception about the idea. Nothing else. Your contribution helps to shape the future! (which I hope it will be very bright, with colors, and Wikipedia everywhere) Regards from User:Micru on meta.

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #158

16:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

16:12, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #159

Norma (constellation)

You did a good job on Musca, so am selfishly asking if you could take alook at the GAN of Norma (constellation)...cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:47, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure, no problem, I'll give it a look tomorrow. Courcelles (talk) 21:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I was unexpectedly absent for a few days. Courcelles (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
No dramas - just grateful for a review :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Email

Dear Courcelles; I didn't receive an email from ArbCom. What address did they send it to? Antonio calalacacalalaca loco Martin (haw haw) 4:32, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

  • @AntonioMartin:, I sent it through the Wikipedia e-mail system, so to whatever address is in your profile. Courcelles (talk) 03:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi again. I found it now. It was just not under the Wikipedia header so that's why I did not find it. I can explain what happened. The house I rent is a house where many people live at, or stay (in fact tonight we have 6 people sleeping here plus the dogs) so many, many people have internet access through this computer, in fact, my dad, he does his edits from the same computer as me. My niece Isabel also has a Wikipedia membership that she created from here, but she doesn't come very often anymore so I know that was not her. So as far as "Pato Frances" now that one I don't know who made that but I suspect probably my sister or brother , or my mom, or one of my multiple nieces and nephews....the only ones I do not suspect of are my dad, my niece that has a user page, myself and my dog. All I can do is try to find out who did that because, even if he/she meant no harm to me or dad as far as Wikipedia is concerned, it still affects us. Sooo.....I guess I have not much else to say, and I do have to go get something from my room right now so the only thing left to say is, Thanks and God bless you! Antonio Cucaracha Venenosa Martin (haw haw!) 10:59, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

Smile

bzzt: "If after six months Gerda Arendt has not blocked under this motion" is probably not what you mean ;) - btw I have not been blocked (or even been warned), nor edit-warred, ever, - why should I now ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

It's fixed now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Oops. I read that maybe half a dozen times, changing a word here or there, and completely managed to miss something glaring. Courcelles (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #160

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

  The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

  • Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
  • Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
  • Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
  • Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.
Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Question

I don't understand your comment here, as you have just linked to his userpage on meta. Is there something I'm missing? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh, that makes no sense now, does it? At the time I made the comment, the page was deleted. Courcelles (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

15:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #161


 
Hello, Courcelles. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

49.50.252.68 (talk) 03:40, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

15:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

My remedies

I left a sincere statement on the proposed decision talk page that I hope you'll read. I agree that I have been harsh with those I disagree with at times. I can adjust my tone so that this is no longer an issue. I almost never edit articles on subjects that I disagree with politically and have been somewhat overeager to defend those I do agree with. Over my ten plus years of work on this website a few of my articles have been on subjects that could be broadly construed as related to American Politics. Of course that would include 9/11 articles where I was at the forefront of keeping conspiracy theories at bay. I also as mentioned at the case talk page supported promotion of the Hillary Clinton article to FA even though I strongly disagree with her political platform. I cross party lines frequently in an effort to meet NPOV and while I may get it wrong at times, I'm anything but a threat to American Political articles. I have no topic bans nd haven't been blocked in 8 years. I'm dismayed that the bulk of my article work will be eliminated since so many of my articles could be conceived as having a relation to American Politics. Even my national park articles are in a way...my FA Yellowstone fires of 1988 were a highly politicized issue at that time. If the main issue based on the evidence isn't that I am a POV pusher or that I am ruining content but instead that I have a civility issue, a remedy along those lines would allow me to continue to contribute in a better way.--MONGO 05:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Something (offline) happened overnight, and I'm just a little shook up today. I'll get back on all this stuff tomorrow. Courcelles (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

WP:BE

Hi. Can you give me a bit of the back story on these two blocks? If I've found a likely sockpuppet, do I open an SPI or report it to you? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

I pinged you, but just to wrap things up, I went ahead and started an SPI. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I've been a bit of a mess lately. Handled the SPI, good catch. Courcelles (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For the drafting arbitrators of the SPI block case decision. Pine 19:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. That was the hardest case I've drafted yet. Courcelles (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #162

Wikidata weekly summary #162

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Bárður Hansen

Hi. You deleted the article Bárður Hansen in 2010. He has now played for the Faroe Islands national football team. Could you please undelete the article, if possible? Kind regards --EileenSanda (talk) 07:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. Courcelles (talk) 18:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #163

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

July 8: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Wednesday July 8, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

This month will also feature on a review of past and upcoming editathons, including Black Lunch Table Editathon @ MoMA on July 13.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

After the main meeting, pizza and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Featuring a keynote talk this month to be determined! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 05:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Wikidata weekly summary #164

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

userification

When you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jihad Kandahar you wrote: "Userification happily done on request." The intelligence analysts allegations about the organization are addressed in An Intimate War: An Oral History of the Helmand Conflict, 1978-2012, so I request that userification.

The book discusses Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849), Mohammed Hashim, Rahmatullah Sangaryar, Bismullah (Guantanamo detainee 968). You deleted these articles when you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849). I request userification of these articles as well. Geo Swan (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I fully give permission for another admin to do this, but I'm away from home until Sunday, and this is just more than I can manage from a phone or my tablet. Courcelles (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Recusal

Hi Courcelles. I'm a little confused by your statement here. You say your "fingerprints were over it", but I'm trying to work out what it is? Do you mean the injunction? If so, I'm concerned that you were involved in the injunction, then just as it passes, you recuse. Sorry to labour the point, but there's something in that timeline that really doesn't feel right. WormTT(talk) 10:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Wasn't the injunction I meant, I meant the history of the matter, specifically my comments on Adjwilly (can't remember the exact spelling of the username, or look it up on a phone) talk page. Even though he wasn't a named party, I was convinced to just get out of the way. Courcelles (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

SetupBuilder

I see that you have deleted a previous page about SetupBuilder. I would like to create a new one. SetupBuilder is listed under List_of_installation_software and is a major competitor to Wise and InstallShield, both of which have Wiki entries.

I am a user of the product, not associated with it in any other way. But I would like the product I use to have a page as do the others. The company's client roster includes one-third of the Fortune Global 500 so it is worthy of mention in my view.

Thank you for your consideration

http://setupbuilder.com/


Dsbglobal (talk) 08:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)dsbglobal

Wikidata weekly summary #165

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

 

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services



Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

You're invited to the Ally Skills Workshop at Wikimania!

You were suggested as someone who might be interested in the Ally Skills Training Workshop at Wikimania! The workshop is designed to train Wikipedia admins to be more aware of sexism and is funded by an Inspire grant. The workshop will focus on teaching specific skills and techniques directly relevant to Wikipedia admins and editors, and in particular will teach people about the psychology of trolls. The workshop will be on Thursday July 16 from 2pm to 5pm in Don Diego 3.

If you are attending Wikimania, you are invited to apply to the Ally Skills Workshop! Space is limited and we may not be able to accept all applications, so apply now. More information, including a link to the application form, is here:

Ally Skills Workshop description and application form

People of all genders are welcome to attend. Unfortunately, travel scholarships for Wikimania are already closed and we don't know of any other sources of travel funding. If you know anyone else attending Wikimania who might be interested in attending this workshop, please encourage them to apply!

Thank you for your time,

Valerie Aurora (Instructor and Interim Executive Director of the Ada Initiative)

Valerietai (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Too bad I won't be anywhere near MEX this summer... Courcelles (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #166

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Old maintenance question...

I nominated Batavia, NY μSA for deletion, and found this diff [114], where you closed via AWB. It looks like this might have been a prevalent problem given your comment, but I can't locate the discussion. Is there some reason this was kept? MSJapan (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@MSJapan: See the old MFD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 September 27. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! MSJapan (talk) 23:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
  • Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
  • Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
  • American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #167

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #168

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

Sunday August 2: WikNYC Picnic

Sunday August 2, 1-7pm: WikNYC Picnic
 
 

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in Brooklyn's Prospect Park, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.

1pm–7pm - come by any time! @ Bartel-Pritchard Square entrance (Prospect Park West and 15th St), immediately on the lawn to your left as you walk through the lovely lotus columns.
Subway:     to 15th Street – Prospect Park (IND Culver Line)

We hope to see you there! --Pharos (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

(Bonus event: WikiWednesday Salon @ Babycastles - Wednedsay, August 19)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #169

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Wikidata weekly summary #170

August 19: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

Wednesday August 19, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
 
 

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities.

After the main meeting, pizza and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street

Featuring a keynote talk this month to be determined! We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

Your assistance please... redux

In this reply you told me you would be away from the wikipedia for several days. You agreed to let me ask any other administrator to userify Mohammed Nasim (Guantanamo captive 849), Mohammed Hashim, Rahmatullah Sangaryar, Bismullah (Guantanamo detainee 968).

Given that the information, new to me, came from a book, not a breaking news story, I thought I could wait for you to return from your trip. It looks like you assumed someone else took care of the userification.

Do you still prefer me to go WP:DRV? Geo Swan (talk) 19:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought you would have either pinged another admin or gone to WP:REFUND (DRV would be if I objected to the action, I don't). Since you haven't, let me get to work... Courcelles (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
@Geo Swan: Done. Courcelles (talk) 23:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks
Could you restore the talk ages, as well? Geo Swan (talk) 06:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
The only thing beyond Wikiproject tagging and you saying you had changed a picture is a requested move on Talk:Bismullah (Guantanamo detainee 968). There really isn't anything useful in any of them. Courcelles (talk) 06:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

NeuLion

Since you protected Dialogic Inc. after the SPI was closed, would you be so kind as to take a look at WP:COIN#NeuLion? I filed it over a week ago, but no response so far. The activity on NeuLion is fairly stale now, so PP might not be worth it, but NeuLion seems to be PR/puffery stretching back to 2009, when NeuLion2009 created it. NPP must have been pretty bad then.George8211 / T 14:37, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Yeah, that's stale at this point, and the last account is autoconfirmed anyhow, so page protection wouldn't actually do much. (Dialogic I cleaned out a sock drawer, which made protection more useful.) Courcelles (talk) 03:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #171

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Confused

What do you mean when you said confirmed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/thevideogameexpert? Gameroffun (talk) 23:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

  • In this case, I have absolutely no doubt that all three accounts, including the one Gameroffun one, are operated by the same person. Courcelles (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • But sir, my ip address is different. Gameroffun (talk) 23:25, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • No, it isn't. And with that lie, this conversation is over. Indefed without waiting for the clerk to do it. Courcelles (talk) 23:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Archived SPI

When you archived WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Rakxit RapStaR something went wrong. the {{SPIpriorcases}} template isn't properly directing to the archive page. Any idea how to fix? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Purging the page seems to have fixed it, at least for me? Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

What is it I don't see?

Regarding my infoboxes parole to which you helped: I like cantatas to look like this (which you may have seen as TFA), therefore I tried to add an infobox in 2013 to one by Benjamin Britten, to improve the composer's works for the (then) upcoming centenary. It's on the talk, because it was reverted by Nikkimaria. We both edited the article before, which none of us started. - I suggested now to revive the infobox, - see talk, and see the article. How does what we have now help a reader (!) to understand at a glance where to put that article in time and place? - I am happy with all other discussions on the matter, btw. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

  • You and Nikkimaria seem to be going around in circles here. Seems like a third opinion would be the best start to getting someone uninvovled to help? Courcelles (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
That's what I came for ;) - late here as I said at the other end. Did you know the curse on me mentioning granularity again? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, but what this needs is other opinions from someone who hasn't written proposed decisions and motions in this topic area. ;) Courcelles (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Do you know anybody without a bias when it comes to infoboxes? Two things I learned in the process: let go and patience. Next life I will possibly find out why infoboxes cause more conflict than images ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I know a lot of people whose opinion about infoboxes is not known -- likely the vast majority of users have never sat down and had a think about the things. The usual places should yield a couple. Courcelles (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I think we had a misunderstanding. (Some days I feel more than others that I am not a native speaker.) When I said eyes I meant eyes, don't think I wanted you to comment. Just look. What I see: I added to an article in good faith. Imagine: there were options to react. It could have been ignored, or thanked for, or discussed. Instead it was reverted. A sum of these reverts made the infoboxes case. But what would life be without without it ;) - Life is too short to continue that "discussion", with the one voice of objection, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

ps: I just returned from a remarkable concert with Bach's cantata BWV 105. That is a different story. The creator of the article saying this, also banned and unable to defend his creation: I have no problem to respect that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

solved, I would say, by 4 more eyes on it, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Great! I wish I could share your interest in the classical music, but sadly I am quite tone deaf. Courcelles (talk) 04:05, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
You might still be open to the political overtones in this cantata, - the composer would have been 150 today, - he received a text offer he could not refuse ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Look and see, the piece is about awe of miraculous deeds, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
I had no idea someone so highly ranked in the Russian nobility; Royal patrons are common enough, but Royals who actually produce art. Fascinating. Courcelles (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
He appeared on stage in plays he wrote, pictured, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Today is the day that all operas by Verdi and Wagner have an infobox, did you know? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Fascinating. If the so-called "Great Infobox War" is over one way or the other, perhaps we will never see this back at Arbcom, something I rejoice in. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
I believe that without arbitration, we might have been there sooner, but never mind. I was late to the wars, miss victims (GFHandel most), wasn't in a single battle, was astonished about arbitration, requested to look into too many reverts of infoboxes (I named 59, numbered), deciding to restrict those who requested, possibly as the easier "solution"? Of the 59, there are still a few without (Bach and Verdi, for example), but most have been settled. On the Main page now a cantata without one, but I have no intention to take the bait, decided to find it amusing ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

On the Main page now: Carl Nielsen works which has not only an infobox but templated entries for the individual works, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:31, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

very nice, though I did find two things in the table that should be changed. I have no idea what the "FS" column is for. Also, the "time" column should be renamed "year" or "date", given the confusion with Time signature. Courcelles (talk) 23:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
"The FS catalogue was first compiled in 1965 by Dan Fog and Torben Schousboe.", infobox: "Catalogue FS 1 to 403", summarized in the lead as "other catalogue numbers". The correct label for "Time" would be "Composition period" - way too long. If you think it's unclear feel free to explain, but it is like that since the composer's 150th birthday 8 June. - I need sleep ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Another cantata is now a GA: Geist und Seele wird verwirret, BWV 35, after a long history from 2002 with several editors. I believe that our readers would be helped best if it had a detailed infobox as other GAs on the topic but one of the former editors disagrees, please look at the talk, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #172

  1. ^ Tripodi, Paolo. The Colonial Legacy in Somalia. p. 66