Open main menu


Discretionary sanctions notice about the BalkansEdit

 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have recently shown interest in the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr. K. 06:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archivedEdit


Hi Cinadon36! You created a thread called Need help with a wording issue at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


Hiya, can you mail me the Kornetis passage relevant to the RfC? czar 14:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

You 've got mail. Cinadon36 10:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Help me!Edit

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I would like to add some info about the fatalities of EOKA's struggle (as per two RS). I inserted the info, I was reverted and when I took it at the Talk Page (almost a month ago), nobody participates. Can anyone help me to resolve this issue without initiating an edit war? Cinadon36 10:05, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Have you directly asked the person who reverted your edit to comment? You can't force anyone to comment if they choose not to. You can use one of the various avenues of dispute resolution. 331dot (talk) 11:01, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks 331dot, that was fast! Well, I asked him at the talk page to contribute his opinion, but I hadn't pinged him as he is a regular so I assumed he must be watchlisting the page. Anyway, I 've made another attempt to reach him, (I ve pinged him this time) [1] and we 'll see how it goes. Cinadon36 09:49, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of anarchismEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of anarchism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Albert CamusEdit


The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Albert Camus has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.


Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Twofingered Typist you did a fine job once more! Cinadon36 12:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

History of AnarchismEdit


I've run through the article again for you and fixed the issues I found. You might want to consider converting the notes that are now in the Reference section to footnotes.


Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!Edit

Hello, Cinadon36,

Thank you for helping out with the recent copyright violations at Holy Fire against a particularly persistent vandal who then branched out into sockpuppetry. The article is protected for a while but it would be great if you could add it to your watchlist. Again, thanks for reverting. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you @Liz: for your all your efforts to protect that article. I am watchlisting it already.   Cinadon36 18:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandros SchinasEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alexandros Schinas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Kaiser matias, Great! Cinadon36 06:45, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alexandros SchinasEdit

The article Alexandros Schinas you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Alexandros Schinas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Bravo! czar 15:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Bravo to you too @Czar:! Your contribution, especially when dealing with heated discussions at the talk page was enormous and it served as a guidance on how to discuss at talks page. Αντικαθεστωτικός deserves credit as well, his efforts and AGF contra-arguments improved the article. Of course, last but not least, Levivich who took into consideration the points of each one of us and re-wrote the article from the scratch. So...congrats mates!   Cinadon36 06:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I am not trying to defend my accidental rollback, since accidents cannot be defended, otherwise they would not be accidents. But I think WP:AGF was written for many good reasons. One of them would be to avoid putting twin question marks around the word :accident in edit-summaries. The other would be to avoid posing the question in an edit-summary where it would be difficult to reply. I detected my accidental rollback while my watchlist was loading and I actually rolled back my edit, but your fast revert did not give me the chance to successfully conclude my self-rollback. Dr. K. 18:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
No prob. Dr.K. (not pinging as apparently you are watchlisting the page and have made it clear elsewhere, that, in such cases, you believe pings are unnecessary) 06:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

New WikiProject Socialism membership systemEdit

Hello! I'm in the process of introducing a new membership system to WikiProject Socialism (designed as part of WikiProject X and adopted by a few other projects). The new system works by filling a form which creates a WikiProject Card. I'm manually creating WikiProject cards for current members. You can find and edit yours here. Any change to your WikiProject card will be automaticalle updated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism/Members. If you have any doubt, please, feel free to contact me by replying here using the {{re}} template. Best, --MarioGom (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


Hi, what exactly were you referring to about my edit? I actually added the Citation needed template where there was no citation. If you're referring to the lead, as far as I know it should summarise the text and thus it isn't necessary to add sources. Either way, can you please help me find reliable sources to add in the page? I'm not an expert and I don't know how and where to find them, or even how to start and how to make sure that the source is actually reliable, because finding a source may be easy but find a source that is realiable is another thing; I found out about Google Scholar only now. What was wrong in adding to the lead anti-statist and libertarian? What was wrong in adding that another thing that distinguishes anarchism from all other ideologies, besides opposition to the state (which is also shared by other ideologies like communism), is opposition to authority and hirerachies (something unique to anarchism)? Indeed, it could be argued that anarchism is both the most consistent form of left-wing politics and the total antithesis of right-wing politics. Or adding As an anti-capitalist and libertarian socialist philosophy to clear why it's considered a far-left ideology? All anarchism is (libertarian) socialism, but not all socialism is anarchism, or even libertarian. Economically, communism, collectivism, syndicalism, mutualism, etc. are all different variants or flavors of (libertarian) socialism. Anarcho-capitalism isn't part of anarchism; it didn't even originate from it (all influences from so-called individualist anarchists were minor since Rothbard turned them upside down), but rather originated in the United States from European liberalism and is considerated New Right liberalism, or stateless liberalism, rather than anarchism. Free-market anarchism is actually part of anarchism because it's (libertarian) socialist. If a philosophy support undisputed, permanent or absentee private ownership of either land or industry, it cannot be considared anarchist or even socialist; as it would be a form of authority and hierarchy that deprive people without it of their liberty. Anarcho-capitalism also support wage slavery, one hierarchy all anarchists have fought against. This is not to be confused with wage labour, which certain anarchists like collectivists and individualist anarchists like Tucker support; they support wage labour not because it's "voluntary" (it cannot be voluntary in a capitalist society), but because in their philosophy it would guarantee the worker the full value of his or her labour. Either way, any property rights that isn't based on possession and use, but rather on absenteeism and receive income by the simple virtue of "owning" something, cannot be considered anarchist. I also removed the Libertarianism and Revolution sidebar simply because they were disruptiving the images below, but they could be added in another sections, for instance the Libertarian one in the Schools of thought and Revolution on anarchists thought about revolution, violence, pacifism, etc. I also re-ordered alphabetically the Post-classical and contemporany anarchism section because it didn't seem to be ordered in any meaningful and I moved anarcho-capitalism in a sub-section like Anarcha-feminism. Thank you for the attention.-- (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for asking. Let's keep the conversation in one place. [2] Cinadon36 18:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your question at Help deskEdit

That was a good question. I've not come across any Wikipedia policies or guidelines that address the issue of how to decide whether a bit of information (verified) should be included in an article or not. We have What Wikipedia is not, but that's more at the article level. If you want to hear from other editors how they make that call, you might want to try starting a discussion at Village Pump (miscellaneous). You won't get The Answer (it will be, it depends), but you might hear people's different views and approaches that you can use to help you form your own approach to it. Schazjmd (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Schazjmd! I 'd re-post it at the Village Pump and I let you know! Cheers! [3] Cinadon36 08:46, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


Re your reply on the Anarchism in Greece page, how can I share material about Drakoulis with you?

Well, what I do is I take photos of a few pages with my phone, I upload them to dropbox and I sent the url-link to the email account of the fellow wikipedian.Cinadon36 13:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cinadon36. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for August 28Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akritas plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taksim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Cinadon36".