Conducting research edit

Hi. I see you're trying to interview Wikipedians. Please read Wikipedia:Ethically researching Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Chris. I've made a research page for my inquiry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriswapo (talkcontribs)
Thanks! Good luck. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
On first glance I am willing to participate in your project. Wikipedia editors are such sticklers for a consistency in action, so I have initiated your talk page @ [1] which can be used for communication and discussion between you and those that respond. I took the liberty to create a "Willing Participants" thread . Buster Seven Talk 22:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Signing is expected and it's easy. Just type in 4 tildes (~) and push Save or "show preview", check out your work...and then Save.
What might be interesting for you is that every Wikipedia article has a talk page "behind it". Especially for articles like Clintons' and Trumps' they can be extremely interesting. They are the history of all the discussions and negotiation about "stuff" that editors want to add to the articles...not everything but surely the important stuff that most likely requires consensus. Buster Seven Talk 22:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Authenticity edit

How do we know you are who you say you are? Buster Seven Talk 22:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photo of me, addressing User:Buster7's request for identity proof. Chriswapo (talk) 23:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Chriswapo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Buster Seven Talk 23:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply