Welcome! edit

Hello, BatesENVR209, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiAviator (talk) 03:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Amager Bakke, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your username edit

Hi, please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

However, my first suspicion does not seem to make sense geographically. You can completely ignore the username concern if "Bates" is a person's name, not part of a company/organization name. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:43, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Talk:Amager Bakke#"Recreational use" section edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Amager Bakke#"Recreational use" section. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burlington Vermont: Sustainable Energy and Food Practices (October 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taewangkorea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Taewangkorea (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, BatesENVR209! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taewangkorea (talk) 21:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please take a moment to respond edit

Hi BatesENVR209, thank you for your contributions. Please take a moment to explain your connection to the companies/organizations that you write about, if a connection exists, or to explicitly deny such a connection below. There seems to be a focus on "affordable housing", "sustainable energy" and similar topics, which is generally fine, but seems to be done excessively and with a lack of neutrality and balance at the moment. A draft has been declined for being too promotional, edits to Amager Bakke have been reverted twice for reading like marketing catalogue text, the latest addition to Mission District, San Francisco appears to be focused on introducing "Plaza 16 Coalition" into the article without a reliable source, and one draft is still pending review. A highly unusual amount of energy is being invested into this, given that the age of your account is 21 hours so far. It seems reasonable to ask if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your edits. I will do so below with a standard message. Please, even if you consider all of these messages to be completely irrelevant to what you do, take a moment to respond at the bottom of your talk page. Wikipedia is a community project, and it can only work correctly if people respond to each other's concerns.

edit

 

Hello BatesENVR209. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BatesENVR209. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BatesENVR209|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:BatesENVR209, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BatesENVR209|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ToBeFree, did this user ever respond to the paid editing enquiries? SK2242 (talk) 23:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Very good ping. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your additions to articles edit

Hi, thank you for your additions to articles such as Congestion pricing and Transportation in New York City. These edits are much appreciated. However, I have a few comments about your revisions:

  • When possible, please try to put your new information in the more specific page, if it exists. For instance, your paragraphs about congestion pricing in San Francisco should go to San Francisco congestion pricing, and your additions about NYC bikes' green waves should go to Cycling in New York City. I have already done these.
  • When you're adding paragraphs about a narrow subject, you don't need to include excessive details of the broader topic. For example, the effects of a green-wave traffic light policy should not go into an article about transportation or cycling in NYC. Just stick to the facts for the more specific topics, such as NYC cycling, and add the broad overviews to the pages about the broader subjects, such as the green wave article.
  • Please note that for date formats, you can't use Month/Day/Year format (e.g. 11/4/19) as it goes against MOS:DATEFORMAT. Instead spell out the month, day and year, e.g. November 4, 2019, or use an ISO 8601 date format, e.g. 2019-11-04.
  • Also note that words like "recently" and "in the past ___ years" are also likely to become outdated in quite a short time per WP:DATED, so we want to stay away from that.
  • Please don't mark major additions as minor edits, as it is considered deceptive.
  • Also, please ensure you're putting everything in the right sections. Your info about car ownership in the New York City article doesn't belong in the bike lane sections for example.

Otherwise, your edits are appreciated, keep up the good work. epicgenius (talk) 00:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:BatesENVR209/sandbox has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:BatesENVR209/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
 

The article I-275 Transformation Proposal in the Tampa Bay Area has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:NOTNEWS and WP:GNG. Additionally, it reads like a copypaste move from a newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kb03 (talk) 21:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: House Bill 2001 (November 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Denver's Mobility Action Plan edit

Hello, BatesENVR209,

Thank you for creating Denver's Mobility Action Plan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Pls see WP:LINK and kindly provide wiki links in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CASSIOPEIA}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rooftop water tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Flint water crisis edit

  Hello, I'm TomCat4680. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Flint water crisis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglass Community Land Trust has been accepted edit

 
Douglass Community Land Trust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:05, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Atlanta's Olympic Legacy Program has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Atlanta's Olympic Legacy Program. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 16:53, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oregon's Single Family Zoning Law has been accepted edit

 
Oregon's Single Family Zoning Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hitro talk 05:58, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atlanta's Olympic Legacy Program has been accepted edit

 
Atlanta's Olympic Legacy Program, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Masterplan Beira 2035 edit

Hello, BatesENVR209,

Thank you for creating Masterplan Beira 2035.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Masterplan Beira 2035. Note that it is currently an "Orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers. Finding ways to connect this article to those for the city or Beira and country of Mozambique would be an obvious solution.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Burlington Vermont: Sustainable Energy and Food Practices concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Burlington Vermont: Sustainable Energy and Food Practices, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Burlington Vermont: Sustainable Energy and Food Practices".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Penn's Landing Renovation Proposal by Durst Organization.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Penn's Landing Renovation Proposal by Durst Organization.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: BatesENVR209 (November 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Penn's Landing Renovation Proposal by Durst Organization.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Penn's Landing Renovation Proposal by Durst Organization.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mission Action Plan 2020 moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mission Action Plan 2020, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Maine Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Car Ban on 14th Street (November 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sea Level Rise Strategy in Charleston edit

 

The article Sea Level Rise Strategy in Charleston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a school essay, or some kind of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 16:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle's Green Factor (November 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hoboken's Stormwater and Flood Management Strategy (December 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Living Breakwaters Staten Island New York (December 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SK2242 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 09:33, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Green Roofs in Seattle edit

On average, Seattle experiences 152 days of rainfall per year.[1] With this extensive amount of rain, there comes a lot of negative effects to water quality and ecosystems. Specifically, one outcome is the lack of control of the polluted stormwater runoff, resulting in raw sewage flowing into Seattle's rivers and harbors. This runoff, along with the help of impervious surfaces, has a serious impact on marine and human life. In response to this, Seattle has begun introducing a green infrastructure alternative: green roofs. This solution takes advantage of unused space above man made buildings that become partially or completely covered with vegetation or a growing medium. These green roofs can come in a variety of different ways, some are garden-like while others contain grasses and drought tolerant plants.[2] Green roofs essentially help reduce and retain water runoff, improve air quality, urban heat island mitigation and increase habitats for various species.[3] They also provide various other advantages such as protecting roofs from sun damage and the insulation of buildings.[4] The goal of instituting green infrastructure is to increase infiltration and evapotranspiration through deep rooted plants and pervious pavement while limiting the amount of water entering the sewer system. While Seattle has only introduced this alternative over 1/10 of 1 percent overall, city leaders are looking to expand it city wide.[5]

Not every building throughout Seattle has successfully mastered the green roof solution. Without the proper maintenance and knowledge of the proper vegetation, places like King County International Airport, the Seattle Justice Center and Seattle City Hall are struggling to reap the benefits of such alternative.[6] However, if done correctly, green roofs can make a large impact on stormwater runoff. Union Stables is a prime example of how this solution provides positive impacts on the environment. With the addition of renovations in 2015 and other efficiency upgrades, the building has a green roof that contributes to the overall 70 percent reduction in energy use.[7]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LEED Platinum Green Rating Hannaford Supermarket Augusta Maine (December 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SK2242 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tampa Bay Water Source Diversification (December 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tagishsimon (talk) 02:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your further additions to articles edit

Hello. I've noticed you editing several articles over the past week or so, adding text about urban planning efforts and their effects on communities. Unfortunately, a lot of your additions sound like essays, rather than having the neutral point of view that is required on Wikipedia.

For instance, on Brooklyn Bridge Park (which has been assessed by the community as a good article), I had to trim a large section of text you added. You added two paragraphs of text about the Hills at piers 3 and 4, and the effort is appreciated. However, not only are they redundant, they're also essay-like:

  • You added It was built from surplus of building materials from various bridge projects in New York City. Your addition was not only more vague than the existing text, but also conflated two separate actions. The paragraph above says The granite terrace features salvaged granite blocks within planted areas, surrounded by trees. The granite was salvaged from reconstruction work on the Roosevelt Island Bridge and Willis Avenue Bridge. [...] Additionally, the Pier 3 hill was formed with salvaged material from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's East Side Access tunneling project.
  • You added However, instead of actually addressing the issue of noise and pollution, one can argue that the Hill merely makes it seem to tourists that these issues that folks who live in Brooklyn Heights and Dumbo regurarly deal with do not actually exist. There is no reliable source to address the claim that the park was intended to alleviate noise and pollution in the first place.
  • You added Additionally, the Hill between Piers 3 and 4 can be seen as a symbol of other unforseen effects of the Park to local residents of Vinegar Hill, Dumbo and Brooklyn Heights. This text is subjective, and not supported by any reliable sources.
  • You added places such as Empire Stores are owned by outside investors, and thus the local residents do not neccesarily enjoy the benefits that this new shopping center gives. This text is not related to Pier 3 at all, but to Empire Stores. Also, there needs to be a reliable source for the claim that outside investment is correlated to residents' enjoyment of the shops.

In the future, please be careful to write in a neutral tone and to support claims with reliable sources. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought for why we cannot have this type of text. Epicgenius (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Epicgenius: I have not seen this editor communicate on any talk page when looking at their contributions. SK2242 (talk) 23:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
SK2242, that is concerning. I don't think BatesENVR is editing in bad faith, but this indicates that they probably haven't even looked at the various messages and warnings left for them, let alone acted upon them. Epicgenius (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unresponsively, persistently ignoring community input including multiple requests to clarify whether WP:PAID or WP:COI apply to the edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: OneNYC 2050: New York Cities strategic plan and Green New Deal (December 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:26, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:BatesENVR209 edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BatesENVR209, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mission Action Plan 2020 edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mission Action Plan 2020, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Staten Island Living Breakwater Project edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Staten Island Living Breakwater Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Car Ban on 14th Street edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Car Ban on 14th Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:I-275 Boulevard-Tampa, FL edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I-275 Boulevard-Tampa, FL, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Clark Freeway Fight edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Clark Freeway Fight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hoboken's Stormwater and Flood Management Strategy edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hoboken's Stormwater and Flood Management Strategy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Living Breakwaters Staten Island New York edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Living Breakwaters Staten Island New York, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:LEED Platinum Green Rating Hannaford Supermarket Augusta Maine edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LEED Platinum Green Rating Hannaford Supermarket Augusta Maine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Tampa Bay Water Source Diversification edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tampa Bay Water Source Diversification, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Affordable Housing in Newton, MA edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Affordable Housing in Newton, MA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:OneNYC 2050: New York Cities strategic plan and Green New Deal edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OneNYC 2050: New York Cities strategic plan and Green New Deal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Staten Island Living Breakwater Project edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Staten Island Living Breakwater Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:B-Wa(h)renhaus edit

  Hello, BatesENVR209. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:B-Wa(h)renhaus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Clark Freeway Fight edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Clark Freeway Fight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hoboken's Stormwater and Flood Management Strategy edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hoboken's Stormwater and Flood Management Strategy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:LEED Platinum Green Rating Hannaford Supermarket Augusta Maine edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LEED Platinum Green Rating Hannaford Supermarket Augusta Maine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Tampa Bay Water Source Diversification edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tampa Bay Water Source Diversification".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Affordable Housing in Newton, MA edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Affordable Housing in Newton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:BatesENVR209 edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BatesENVR209".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Car Ban on 14th Street edit

 

Hello, BatesENVR209. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Car Ban on 14th Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Lam, Linda. "Seattle's Rainy Reputation Is Well-Deserved". The Weather Channel. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  2. ^ Stiffler, Lisa. "City of Seattle wants more eco-friendly 'green roofs'". Seattle PI. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  3. ^ McIntosh, Annika. "green roofs in seattle a survey of vegetated roofs and rooftop gardens" (PDF). City of Seattle. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  4. ^ Stiffler, Lisa. "City of Seattle wants more eco-friendly 'green roofs'". Seattle PI. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  5. ^ Stiffler, Lisa. "City of Seattle wants more eco-friendly 'green roofs'". Seattle PI. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  6. ^ Stiffler, Lisa. "City of Seattle wants more eco-friendly 'green roofs'". Seattle PI. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
  7. ^ Green. "Green Roofs + Seattle's Downtown: A Perfect Match". Seattle Business Magazine. Retrieved 4 December 2020.