Welcome! edit

Hello, BPK2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Barringer edit

Neustrian Cycle edit

see here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels/Fantasy task force. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC).Reply

Gerfalcon edit

Congratulations on finding the first-edition dust covers of the Gerfalcon (novel) trilogy. How did you get hold of them? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC).Reply

Thanks. Google image search using keywords gerfalcon leslie barringer. I'd been looking for those a long time. BPK (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Bulmer edit

Many thanks - Kenneth Bulmer edit

Many thanks for your work on the Kenneth Bulmer page. I only knew of Bulmer as "Adam Hardy", having read several of his "Fox" series as a kid. I never knew he wrote SF, which is weird because I was (and still am) an SF nut and you'd think if I liked SF and also liked the Fox series (set in the British Navy at war in 1795-1805) then I'd have gone mad for Bulmer's SF. But growing up in rural South Australia we were lucky to see more than one book in any series, let alone books across several series and across several psedonyms.

The breadth and volume of Bulmer's output is simply staggering. I'm just sad that I only figured out who "Adam Hardy" was merely two years after Bulmer's death :-( --Ossipewsk 00:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. I first encountered Bulmer as "Alan Burt Akers," author of the Dray Prescot books. I'm not sure I've actually read a non-pseudonymous Bulmer novel even yet! It was kind of sad to learn that he passed away soon after I created the article. BPK 06:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Burroughs edit

Bibliography edit

Thank you for helping out with my new Edgar Rice Burroughs bibliography article. I see you are active in ERB articles. Please join the discussion over at my talk about how to improve it, especially as it pertains to the book you added. Thanks. Jmj713 (talk) 04:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jane edit

I recently reverted your piping of links at the Jane disambiguation page - the Manual of Style for disambig pages says to never pipe those links except where necessary, so that it's more transparent to the reader. Happy editing, -- stillnotelf is invisible 13:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dejah Thoris edit

Hi, BPK2! As a fan of the Edgar Rice Burroughs Barsoom series from my college days (25+ years ago), having recently decided to "renew my acquaintance" with these books, it was fun to come across your relatively new Dejah Thoris article here on Wikipedia while just doing some casual searching (think of a topic that is of interest to me and see if there's an article on it :) I've added a little to the article in terms of categorization.

It looks like you've done a lot on the Burroughs series'. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Lini 05:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

In finnish scifi-fan magazine "Portti" was once in 90's an article titled "The Bosom of Dejah Thoris". Because ERB describes DT of having remacable bosom, the article asked how is it possible? The martians do not breastfeed their egg-born children, so what's the use? Also same born-from-egg makes the navel unnecessary, however most Barsoom-comix and painters (like Frazetta) draws to their barsoom-caracters a navel. John Carter excluded - an earthman. Have these been discussed anywhere? --RicHard-59 (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
While there's little point in trying to make sense of Burroughs' extraterrestrial biology, since he has earthlings interfertile with the presumed alien humanoid species of Mars and the Moon, his Martians are evidently mammals and so presumably do breastfeed their egg-born children. An imperfect Earthly analog would be the platypus, which is both egg-laying and milk-secreting (although not possessed of actual nipples, I believe). I'm not sure Burroughs ever made any particular note of whether his Martians had navels, though most commentators assume with you that as egg-layers they did not. Yes, the whole matter has been discussed elsewhere, notably by science fiction author L. Sprague de Camp, who devoted some thought to the issue of Burroughs' biological inconsistencies. He himself, in creating his Barsoom-inspired planet Krishna, made its natives mammalian breast-feeding egg-layers (though not interfertile with earthlings). BPK (talk) 16:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tarzan Films edit

Hi, glad to see another fan of the movies has been creating articles. I've done quite a few myself recently, including all three of Mike Henry's. Hey, I was planning to do articles on Buster Crabbe's "Tarzan the Fearless" and Glenn Morris' "Tarzan's Revenge" in the next couple days. I wanted to get with you and make sure I didn't step on your toes in case you were planning to do them. Let me know. Thanks. Sir Rhosis (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • I went ahead and created the articles. Again, hope you weren't planning to. Sir Rhosis (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nope, no problem. Will be interested in reading the articles. Thanks for checking. BPK (talk) 18:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Hi, me again. I'm getting ready to do the article for Tarzan and the Huntress, so by the time you're up and read this, hopefully that link won't be red. Wanted to run a couple things by you. One: I'm considering writing an article for the cheapie 1999 Sony Wonder animated film called "Tarzan of the Apes." Yes, it was cheesy and has no voice credits and would be a skimpy article, BUT it was made with ERB Inc.'s permission and is an "official" release, just like the other animated Tarzan films. Would you consider putting it in your Tarzan film box if I do the article? Two, have you ever considered doing a film box (I'm talking about that big blue box you made and attached to all the Tarzan film articles, in case my inaccurate language may confuse you) for the various Tarzan TV shows. There'd be the Ely series, the "Lord of the Jungle" Saturday morning series, the Joe Lara Tarzan in Manhattan telefilm, the Tarzan the ecologist series with the tick mark over the second "a", the Joe Lara 1996 "Epic Adventures" series and finally the early 2000s animated series based on the Disney film. Just thought it might be something you would like to do. I could give it a go if you don't want to, but I'm fairly slow at these things -- whenever I create a film article, I just copy and paste an old one into the new article's blank box and go through and change the names, dates, casts, plot, etc., by hand. Anyway, I enjoy your articles. Your plots synopses are so much better than mine -- I just put enough in there to get by with, meaning to expand them someday. Best to you. Sir Rhosis (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Sir R. To answer your questions in turn:
1. Yes, it does sound like the Sony Wonder film ought to be in the film box. If you notify me when the article is done, I will see to it.
2. I think I will leave the box on the TV shows to someone more knowledgable on them; if you want to do one, it's fine with me.
Thanks for the kind comments. When I've done Tarzan film articles I've usually looked for information on the films on the net, starting with the IMDb, gone through all the plot descriptions, and written a new one based on all the relevent material. I may go back and give similar treatment to some of the articles others have created where the plot descriptions are skimpy.
BPK (talk) 13:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I've added it to the film box, and also corrected the preceded by/followed by links in Tarzan and the Lost City and Tarzan to take it into account. BPK (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cheeta edit

Thanks for the help on the Cheeta page! I know you put a lot of work into splitting the Cheeta article out to the Jiggs page, so sorry for undoing a lot of your work! The two articles really weren't working in that format, lots of duplicate information and lots of confusing and contradictory information. I think it's best that Cheeta remains the sole article so that all effort goes to one place. Cheers, Jack (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, most of what you say is definitely valid, though I've reinstated a shorter Jiggs article, as the original Jiggs is notable in his own right as originator of the Cheeta role. I've kept some of the material on the later Jiggses there, though perhaps it should be cut down further. I agree that the material on Gentry's Cheeta hoax goes better in the Cheeta article, and have revised the material moved there to make it fit that context better. I originally separated the Jiggs and hoax material from the Cheeta article when it became evident as a result of Rosen's investigations that the chimp the article was then primarily about (Cheeta/Jiggs IV) had never actually been Cheeta, and that for the Cheeta article to have any validity it needed to be about the character, not the alleged portrayer. Accordingly, I also at that time brought together all the material I could find about the actual portrayers to augment the Cheeta article. BPK (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I will remove the Other Gentry chimpanzees associated with the Cheeta role section from the Jiggs article, as it is specifically about the first Jiggs. Still I don't think there is enough information remaining (two or three paragraphs, and all of it duplicated from Cheeta) to merit its own article. Jack (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Use of derviative works templates edit

As the creator of {{Tarzan}}, I thought you might be interested in the discussion about the use of derivative works templates in author bio articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#Derivative works and cultural references templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Navboxes on author pages edit

Since you are the leading registered editor in terms of edits at Edgar Rice Burroughs, you might want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Novels#Derivative_works_and_cultural_references_templates regarding including navigation boxes for adaptations of and related subjects to an authors works on the author's bio page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cabell edit

The Biography of Manuel edit

Not sure why you removed the redirect dab. Since Jurgen still redirect to this article, and the other target still exists, the note is still needed. IPSOS (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I removed it because Jurgen should have redirected to Jurgen, A Comedy of Justice. And now it does. BPK 22:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ah, that's a most reasonable answer. Thanks! IPSOS (talk) 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Carter edit

Template:Lin Carter (books) edit

I certainly admire your diligence and industry, but I wonder if there ever will be or even should be articles for all the redlinks on the template... AnonMoos (talk) 04:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Almost certainly not! However, I decided to link everything during the initial phase of the project to check for any unknown articles on the works floating around out there. Once I've finished checking out all the links that appear live, I'll likely kill most of the short story links, at least. That should happen in the next day or so. Meanwhile, thank you for the kind words. BPK (talk) 12:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

de Camp edit

DYK edit

  On 16 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Viagens Interplanetarias, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 16:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Howard edit

DYK for Blood & Thunder: The Life & Art of Robert E. Howard edit

Thanks from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Return of Conan edit

Hello...I wonder at You, I can explain that she has cancelled from me and why? In fact, Björn Nyberg and L. Sprague de Camp changed the title from ′'Conan the Avenger. Thanks. --Angelo.1961 (alias Big Beast) 14:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Conan the Avenger is a collection containing the novel The Return of Conan by Nyberg and de Camp and part 2 of "The Hyborian Age" by Howard. The title of The Return of Conan was not changed when it was included in the collection: the table of contents for the book lists it and the Howard piece under their original titles. The Return of Conan is therefore not "also known" as Conan the Avenger, and it is not correct to say so. BPK (talk) 14:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Keillor edit

Thank you for brining a voice of reason to that dispute. Oniononion (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I try. The sound of grinding axes was getting a bit loud—speaking as a person not wholly innocent from grinding axes myself. My feeling is that when all you have is one account of events in opposition to another without proof of which is correct (if indeed either is completely correct), it's better to present both accounts than to annoint one as the gospel. It's also helpful to remember that different witnesses can interpret the same events in quite different ways. When there's room for disagreement we ought not to do too much interpeting... BPK (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Garrison Keillor edit

Category:Garrison Keillor, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 19:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lindsay edit

The Haunted Woman edit

Yes, just as I added an unreferenced tag, a source appears. Great. I was looking for a few sources myself, as I was sure there would be some out there. Not that I had any quibbles with the assertions in the article :) FlowerpotmaN·(t) 15:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Lovecraft edit

Lovecraft: A Look... edit

Thanks for putting in the image and adding the categories...it looks spiffy. Nareek 21:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Glad to oblige. BPK 06:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lovecraft: A Biography edit

First of all, Wow! (after seeing your user page) and thank you (after seeing your user page) for all your work on some of the greatest authors and books. Very nice. I came by to ask if you are sure about the name H. P. Lovecraft: a Biography with the small 'a'. Book covers and other sources seem to have the capital 'A', but even some of the listings at Abebooks have the smaller version. Both inquisitive and interested if there's a story behind that on the author's end. Again, thank you for your 'stuff'. Randy Kryn 12:38 15 February, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Randy. Thanks for the appreciation. From a cursory check of sources it does indeed look like I might have made an error in lowercasing the "a." I'll have a chance to check some more definitive references on Tuesday, and if they also confirm your observation I'll fix the article. It would be better just to check the title page of the book (bibliographically considered more definitive than the cover), but I don't have access to a copy at the moment. That I should be able to check Tuesday, too. Anyway, thank you for pointing out this possible (likely?) error. I'll definitely look into it. 03:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. As I mentioned, some Abebooks listings list it as a lowercase 'a' so you probably had something in mind when you placed it in lower-case. Maybe it's used as an alternate name or is the correct name and most people miss it. A good friend of mine is very active in the Edgar Rice Burroughs groups, goes to their yearly dum-dums, and I'll mention your work on Burroughs to him (maybe it will nudge him and others in their group to add to the Burroughs pages here, which I've urged him to do). I actually spoke on Burroughs, and gave a tour of some of his homes, at the 1980 World Science Fiction Convention (I think it was '80). Haven't thought of that in years. I often play around with templates here, which is how I spotted the 'a', and thought there might be a good story behind it. Enjoy. Randy Kryn 11:08 16 February, 2015 (UTC)
No good story, just a simple error I think. I work in a library and am used to cataloging according to the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, which would lowercase it. Anyway, looks like it was indeed an error. I'll fix it.
If you're a Burroughs fan, you might be interested in checking out the parody plays The Prisoner of Zodanga and The Barber of Sari over at ERBzine. The first entwines the worlds of Barsoom and L. Sprague de Camp's Harold Shea. The latter takes the already absurd concept of time in Pellucidar to even more absurd extremes. Both were perpetrated by yours truly. BPK (talk) 15:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Okay, it's fixed. Still have some link clean-up to do. BPK (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Great, caught that one, thanks. Still doesn't explain why some Abebooks listings use the lower-case 'a', an odd one. I'm not a fan of all of Burroughs work, just read the Mars stories when I was in high school, one after the other, and grew up around some of his old homes. I have a friend though who loves him and attends the dum-dums every year, so will mention that to him too. Thanks! Randy Kryn 20:50 17 February, 2015 (UTC)

Lupoff edit

Space War Blues edit

Hi Brian,

I want to include an excerpt from the book (maybe one paragraph) to illustrate the writing style; this would fall under the fair use laws vis. book reviews, I think, but I don't know how Wikipedia feels about that. Any thoughts? swain 00:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, someone quoted Edgar Rice Burrough's initial description of Dejah Thoris for the Barsoom article (two short paragraphs), which no one ever seemed to object to. It's no longer there only because I moved it to the Dejah Thoris article, where it still is. I doubt there would be any objection to a short quote, and if anyone does find it a problem they can always delete it. BPK 06:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Right; I just wanted to avoid typing it all in and having that effort thrown out :o) Thanks! swain 15:33, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shakespeare edit

Lord Chamberlain's Men edit

I think it should be merged. See the article in question Omegastar (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know of the proposal. My response is on the article's talk page. BPK (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


Tolkien edit

Numenor & Atlantis edit

"per Tolkien himself, Númenór was definitely his version of Atlantis"

I wouldn't be so bold as to say you were wrong, but I was under the impression that Tolkien was stringently opposed to people drawing parallels between his fiction and the 'real' world and as such, assumed this extended to other tales and fables. Though many commentators compare his work to European mythology, I was unaware that he himself did this. Do you perhaps have a link to an online source of information regarding this - I find the idea very interesting. - Hayter 10:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

He wasn't quite as stringent as many people think. While opposing any attempt to make a one-to-one correlation between places in Middle Earth and places in the modern world, he did both explicitly and implicitly state that the areas covered by the trilogy's action and maps was the northwest area of the Old World -- that is, Europe -- and the Shire was of course a spiritual stand-in for England, even if not necessarily identical physically.
Tolkien's Middle Earth setting as a whole was always admitted to be a fictional pre-history of the real world, as noted in the prefatory matter to The Lord of the Rings. As such, Númenór was not merely a parallel to Atlantis, but his version thereof -- or rather, our Atlantis myth was at least implicitly presented as an imperfect memory of Númenór, the "real" Atlantis in his scheme of things.
While the existence of Atlantis in the real world's prehistory is dubious to say the least, its legendary role in that prehistory is well established -- and Númenór plays exactly that same role in Tolkien's fictional version of prehistory. (The role being, of course, that of a high maritime civilization that conquered much of Middle Earth = Europe that afterwards sank beneath the sea, but from which much of later civilization derived).
If Middle Earth is admitted to be an ancient version of our own world, the conclusion that Númenór is intended to be Atlantis is inescapable. Tolkien made this plain both in its corresponding role and in his alternative names for Númenór in the appendices to The Return of the King. I know of no online source for the identification, but if memory serves I believe the issue is addressed more directly in the published volume of his letters and Christopher Tolkien's History of Middle Earth set.
--BPK.


Okay, I've done a quick web search, and now I can provide you some references.
http://greenbooks.theonering.net/quickbeam/files/081503.html
makes much the same argument I have above.
http://fin.go.wifl.at.org/tables/html/numenor.htm
is a good presentation of Tolkien's various versions of the Númenór story.
http://www.merp.com/essays/MichaelMartinez/mmartineznumenortour
cites the smoking gun; Tolkien's actual equation of Númenór with Atlantis.
--BPK, 12/14/05.


Very interesting, thanks for taking the time to look it up for me. I note that TORn calls this alignment with 'reality' unusual for Tolkien so perhaps my supposition was not completely false, but the similarities are obvious (and obviously intended) - Atalantë certainly makes a point.

I should really get my own copy of The Silmarillion and investigate C Tolkien's publications. Thanks again. -Hayter 12:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tolkien stuff edit

Hi there. You removed a category I added to Gandalf Award. You were quite right to do so - I apologise for going overboard with that. I still want to keep track of things like that (I periodically survey "what links here" from Tolkien-related articles to keep track of how people are linking to the articles), so I have added that article at User:Carcharoth/Tolkien_categories#Other_4 (though I'll make sure not to put it in a category). If you spot any other cases where I've overcategorised, I'd appreciate it if you could add them there. Hope that's OK. Carcharoth 02:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, wow. I just found Tolkien: A Look Behind "The Lord of the Rings" - I saw a copy of that recently - I'll have to dig around and see if I actually bought it or not. Congratulations on a nice article! I hope you don't mind that I recategorised it to Category:Tolkien studies, as that is where similar book articles have gone. I also put a {{ME-project}} tag on it, and assessed it as part of the ongoing assessment of Tolkien-related articles. If you have any other books like that, would you be thinking of working on them in the near future? Carcharoth 02:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I don't mind. Good call on that one. I do have copies of various other Tolkien studies I've read over the years, but have no immediate plans to add articles on them – they're pretty much all in storage. Nor do I keep close tabs on the various Tolkien articles, just (mostly) articles I've created or worked on. But if I run across anything of your I think needs work I'll be happy to note it under this discussion. BPK 03:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wright edit

Thank you for your contribution in John Henry Wright. I can see you were one of the primary contributors in this article. The article has been nominated at DYK. It was a very difficult task to 5x expand this article. Could you please some details on his scholarly papers like "The Origin of Plato's Cave", "Present Problems of the History of the Classical Literature". In addition, A History of All Nations from the Earliest Times has been started by Rosiestep. --TitoDutta 16:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • And I did not add those two references. I mainly expanded using Briggs, the JSTOR articles and Wright's own work. --TitoDutta 16:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
In accordance with your request, I have added details on "The Origin of Plato's Cave" to the article, and corrected a few others. May tackle the other piece at some point. Looks like the two references to my own work I felt compelled to delete had been added by Rosiestep. BPK (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Zelazny edit

Roger Zelazny edit

Nice work! Nareek 16:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, hope I wasn't stepping on any toes by just going ahead and doing it. BPK 17:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
No way--that's the Wikipedia method in action. If anyone doesn't like it, they can always change it back. Be bold! Nareek 19:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dilvish edit

Hello there! When you moved Dilvish the Damned to Dilvish, the Damned, you copied the contents from one page to another. Unfortunately, copying the contents of the page does not copy the history--something required for the GFDL license. MediaWiki, however, provides a move function. An admin deleted Dilvish, the Damned, and I've moved Dilvish the Damned to that location. :-) Jude (talk,contribs,email) 07:55, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the correction. BPK 07:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Science fiction edit

WikiProject Science Fiction edit

Hi, I have seen that you have started / contributed to quite a few articles on science fiction and fantasy related subjects, so I thought you'd be interested in joining this wikiproject. But I see that you are not a new user at all and if you already know about the wikiproject, sorry for this annoyance. :) - TwoOars 23:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge Proposal for New_Writings_in_SF_1 edit

Please see the New Writings in SF 1 talk page for discussion of merging these articles. Padillah (talk) 16:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for New Writings in SF edit

  On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Writings in SF, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Glad to see your solid work on SF articles edit

Do you get to any SF cons at all? (I mean real cons, not Dragon or the comics shows). --Orange Mike | Talk 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the appreciation expressed in your heading. No, my SF interest is largely a private vice, which has broadened over the years into a scholarly one. Most of my contact with other fans is online, on wikipedia, via email or through the de for de Camp Yahoo group, with which I've been heavily involved for several years. Did attend one convention in San Francisco many years ago in the early 1980s, but that's it as far as that sort of activity has gone. BPK (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Germany Invitation edit

 

Hello, BPK2! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notability and sources of authors and books edit

Hi BPK2. You have more experience than me with book articles, so let me check something with you...I'm just trying to understand the notability on these book articles e.g. Magic in Ithkar. My understanding is that WP:BK sets the standard as "subject[1] .. a general audience". I see no general audience or non-trivial sources, so please can you enlighten me? My tagging with unref is wrong, more correct is if I tag them all refimprove / notability / noinline. What do you think? Widefox (talk) 19:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good work for adding refs. I'm not too sure about the quality of sources in these articles, so I added back the refimprove tag. Is that ok with you? I noticed you removed the tag, maybe you think the notability covers it already? Widefox (talk) 20:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
The Internet Speculative Fiction database is a wonderful and highly reliable bibliographic source, quite frequently cited in articles on science fiction and fantasy books. Fantastic Fiction isn't as authoritative, but it's fairly comprehensive in what it covers, and occasionally provides nuggets of information not found elsewhere. Where I've cited it in these articles it generally provides information that could be obtained equally as well from the books themselves -- but it's a quick and easy way to add another reference! Actually, the only way I could improve the references at this point would be by adding more. There's nothing wrong with the ones cited. The only remaining issue I can see is that of notability. The editors of the series are quite notable in the field (Norton more than Adams), and you at least used to be able to justify book articles on the grounds of providing comprehensive coverage of the works of a notable author. Not sure if that still applies. If the books need to stand up by their own merits, the issue is more problematical. But having written the articles, I'd hate to lose them... BPK (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Survey for new page patrollers edit

 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello BPK2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC).Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for pointing out that the problematic copyright section was widespread throughout books by that author. I have begun deleting the sections, as well as tagging the articles as relying only on one source and as having no footnotes. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chicks and Balances edit

 

The article Chicks and Balances has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources and as a result does not meet WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see you removed the proposed deletion template, arguing the article does have a reliable source. The Internet Speculative Fiction Database is not a WP:RELIABLESOURCE AusLondonder (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well, I would say it is. But in any case, there's also OCLC, as per the infobox. BPK (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Conan edit

Can you explain on the Talk page further about date based titles please? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have done so on Talk:Conan the Barbarian (2011 novel) as per your request. The argument is specific to the issue in question (whether in this specific instance author-based disambiguation should be preferred to date-based disambiguation), and does not necessarily constitute an argument for date based titles in general. BPK (talk) 16:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, WP:BOOKDAB is not in a good shape, seems to have been played around with by 2 or 3 users who aren't actively editing books any more. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ISFDB links edit

Please don't remove ISFDB links from external links sections merely because the same page is used as an article reference. When standard links (especially templated links) are present in most or all suitable articles, practice is that use as a reference should not preclude inclusion in the external links section, since users will come to expect to find it there. Note that IMDB templated links are usually present in performer articles even if used as references. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:02, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Seems redundant, but okay. BPK (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia awards edit

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
For nice work with Blood & Thunder: The Life & Art of Robert E. Howard. AdamBMorgan (talk) 00:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The D.C Excellence Award edit

File:D.C. Excellence Award.png Excellence Award for New Page Creation Services in Wikipedia
Congratulations! Denver| Thank you and Have a nice Day! (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Weird Tales edit

Hi -- since you created the article, I wanted to let you know I've proposed that Weird Tales (anthology series) be merged into the main Weird Tales article. See the discussion at Talk:Weird Tales if interested. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Darrell Schweitzer Megapack for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Darrell Schweitzer Megapack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Darrell Schweitzer Megapack (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Redirects edit

Rather than mass-undoing my redirects, IMHO it would be productive if you could develop a single article--so that I may get the chance to see what such an article would result into!As of now,I have re-instated the redirects.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 15:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wait,I am not undoing your reversion of my edit at Nebula Awards Showcase 2017 and letting it stay as it is.And I sincerely hope, that I will see some real improvements soon!Thanks!Winged Blades Godric 15:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
And I'm planning on a selective merge from the content section etc. from all destination articles to the target.Winged Blades Godric 15:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
I will be happy to further develop one of the articles, and in the meantime will extend you the courtesy of refraining from mass-undoing your mass redirects. I have no taste for edit wars. Let me state plainly here, however, that I consider the mass redirecting itself discourteous, improper and disruptive editing. When contesting an article, it is preferable to tag it for discussion and state your grounds for challenging it in the tag, not take unilateral action. Doing the latter prejudges the issue. Doing the latter on a mass scale simply compounds the prejudgment. BPK (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Darrell Schweitzer Megapack.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Darrell Schweitzer Megapack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 12 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beyond the Gates of Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Nebula Awards 19 edit

Hi. A few years back an editor changed all of the Nebula Award anthology articles to redirects, and you put them all back except The Nebula Awards 19. Is there any chance you could do this one too? If not I could do it, but I don't know the context and I don't know where I would get the book cover image. Thanks! Dan Bloch (talk) 15:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dan. The desecrator's rationale was that there was little supporting evidence as to the volumes' significance. I recreated the articles for each as I found such supporting evidence, generally in the form of reviews. I have every intention of recreating #19 too, eventually, but to date haven't found any reviews. All I can say is, if you or someone else doesn't get to it first, stay tuned on that one. BPK (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

isfdb shows three reviews. Is that not sufficient? Let me know if you want me to do it. Dan Bloch (talk) 16:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is, it's just that I hadn't been able to put my hands on any copies of them in order to quote them. That said, since there's plainly popular demand for the article (from you) I have restored the article. Hopefully some enterprising soul with access to the actual reviews will be able to supply material therefrom, if I'm not able to. Also restored the cover image. A good source for most science fiction cover images is the very same isfdb on which you found the review citations, by the say. BPK (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Dan Bloch (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Finally was able to get my hands on (and quote) the Tom Easton review of the anthology from Analog. Now added to the article. So there's that. BPK (talk) 18:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:The Best of Murray LeinsterUK.jpg The Best of Murray LeinsterUS.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Best of Murray LeinsterUK.jpg The Best of Murray LeinsterUS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:45, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sabor (Tarzan) edit

 

The article Sabor (Tarzan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, found nothing with WP:BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sabor (Tarzan) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabor (Tarzan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabor (Tarzan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 00:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:John R. Fultz edit

  Hello, BPK2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John R. Fultz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:John R. Fultz edit

 

Hello, BPK2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John R. Fultz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Winged Victory comics.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Winged Victory comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:This Strange Way of Dying.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:This Strange Way of Dying.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Anthems Outside Time and Other Strange Voices.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Anthems Outside Time and Other Strange Voices.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of C. M. Kornbluth.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of C. M. Kornbluth.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Cordwainer Smith.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Cordwainer Smith.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Eric Frank Russell.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Eric Frank Russell.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Frederik Pohl.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Frederik Pohl.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Best of Fredric Brown.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Best of Fredric Brown.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Harry Turtledove.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Harry Turtledove.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of John Brunner.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of John Brunner.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:53, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Leigh Brackett.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Leigh Brackett.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Lester del Rey.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Lester del Rey.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Raymond Z. Gallun.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Raymond Z. Gallun.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Robert Bloch.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Robert Bloch.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:55, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Dance Band on the Titanic.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Dance Band on the Titanic.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Jack Williamson.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Jack Williamson.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Hal Clement.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Hal Clement.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of C L Moore.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of C L Moore.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of Henry Kuttner.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of Henry Kuttner.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Red Dust and Dancing Horses and Other Stories.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Red Dust and Dancing Horses and Other Stories.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of James Blish.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of James Blish.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of John W. Campbell.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of John W. Campbell.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Best of H P Lovecraft.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Best of H P Lovecraft.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Far Away and Never.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Far Away and Never.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Kesrick.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Kesrick.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Dragonrouge.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Dragonrouge.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Mandricardo.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Mandricardo.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Callipygia.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Callipygia.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Flame of Iridar-Peril of the Starmen.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Flame of Iridar-Peril of the Starmen.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Planetary Adventures.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Planetary Adventures.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Prehistoric Adventures.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Prehistoric Adventures.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Mysteries of the Faceless King.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Mysteries of the Faceless King.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Last Heretic.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Last Heretic.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:VikingAdventures.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:VikingAdventures.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Witness for the Dead.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Witness for the Dead.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Nebula Awards 19.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Nebula Awards 19.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Revelations of Zang.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Revelations of Zang.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Worlds Beyond Worlds.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Worlds Beyond Worlds.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:1920 Americas great war.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:1920 Americas great war.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Award Stories Sixteen.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Award Stories Sixteen.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 21.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 21.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Empress of Dreams.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Empress of Dreams.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Best of Edmond Hamilton.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Best of Edmond Hamilton.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Avenger from Atlantis.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Avenger from Atlantis.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Swordsmen from the Stars.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Swordsmen from the Stars.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Twilight of the Gods-Hamilton collection.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Twilight of the Gods-Hamilton collection.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Elak King of Atlantis.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Elak King of Atlantis.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Elak of Atlantis.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Elak of Atlantis.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Breakfast with the Ones You Love.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Breakfast with the Ones You Love.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:A Song for a New Day.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:A Song for a New Day.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Father of Lies.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Father of Lies.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Academic Exercises.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Academic Exercises.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Resurrection Man's Legacy-collection.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Resurrection Man's Legacy-collection.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The End of the End of Everything-stories.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The End of the End of Everything-stories.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Law and the Heart.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Law and the Heart.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Sapphire Goddess collection.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Sapphire Goddess collection.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Thief of Forthe and Other Stories.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Thief of Forthe and Other Stories.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 22.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 22.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards Showcase 2010.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards Showcase 2010.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 25.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 25.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 24.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 24.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 20.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 20.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 10.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 10.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 29.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 29.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Award Stories 4.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Award Stories 4.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Award Stories 3.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Award Stories 3.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards Showcase 2004.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards Showcase 2004.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:The Contraband Cow.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:The Contraband Cow.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 33.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 33.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 32.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 32.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:Nebula Awards 31.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Nebula Awards 31.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:10, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File copyright problem with File:AIs-anthology.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:AIs-anthology.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tom Crosshill for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Crosshill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Crosshill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Karen Osborne edit

Hello. I have removed unverified personal information from Karen Osborne (maiden name, birth date, etc.). Please do not add it without high quality reliable sources per WP:BLP and WP:DOB (see also WP:BLPPRIMARY). Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Unicorns II for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unicorns II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorns II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 00:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Unicorns! for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unicorns! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorns! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:04, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chalcis edit

Please consider restoring "Kingdom of Chalcis" to its previous redirect and speedily deleting your new unattributed "Chalcis (ancient state)" which has the same sourcing problems as its predecessor. Your so-called "ancient state" is basically Iturea, where I redirected, since most of the listed rulers are described as rulers of Iturea (1, 2), not just Chalcis specifically. Any information should be merged there, not copied into an entirely new page. Avilich (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

We are evidently in disagreement as to the validity of the article. If I recall correctly, your main objection to it, expressed when you deleted it, was its characterization as a kingdom, an issue I addressed on recreating it. Your more general objections may be valid, but do not, I feel, warrant unilateral deletion, or speedy deletion, of a long-standing article developed my multiple contributors. You are certainly welcome to initiate a deletion nomination. BPK (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
You misunderstood then: the rationale was not simple terminology, but that it was not a distinct state from the one described in the article I merged it into. There was no unilateral deletion, I merged it into the correct article, but you recreated the incorrect one (together with all of its old sourcing problems), so please undo it. Avilich (talk) 03:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I understand your rationale. I simply don't concur with it. You made assumptions about the validity of two articles without, as far as I can tell, consulting with other Wikipedians who contributed to them. You then acted, also without consultation, on the assumption your action was routine and would not be contested. So, yes, you acted unilaterally. I do not question your good will or or desire to make improvements, only whether this was, indeed, an improvement. I don't think it was.
In regard to the sourcing issue, I don't really see the problems you do. The Chalcis article seemed to me reasonably well-sourced, better, in fact, than quite a number of other articles whose validity has not been controverted, and which have been allowed to let stand.
In regard to the distinct state issue, again, we are not in agreement. Ituraea was only a unified kingdom (possibly) during the reign of Ptolemy, and, if anything, the term better describes an ethnicity than a state. The city-states of Chalcis and Abila/Abilene that emerged from the ruin of Ptolemy's realm seem to have been longer-lived, more stable, and actually more state-like. As such, I believe they warrant separate articles, just as, say, Rome warrants an article despite having formerly been part of Latium.
I also note that it doesn't appear that much of the material in the Chalcis article has actually been incorporated into the one on Ituraea, meaning that the "merge" resulted in the loss of information--and, indeed, much of the evidence that the Ituraeans ever in fact did succeed at effectively establishing anything like a state or states.
There is nothing wrong with a routine merge if it is truly routine--that is, obvious, uncontroversial and uncontested. This, in my view, isn't. In such cases, there's s process to sort things out, which, again, you are welcome to pursue. If the consensus is in accord with your position, that would be the go-ahead for the merge. Otherwise, your concerns may be better addressed by efforts to improve both articles.
Returning the situation to the status quo, which is essentially what I did, after taking into accord your contention that Chalcis wasn't really a kingdom (which appeared valid), seems a better way to go until the issues in dispute are resolved. BPK (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't know how you found that Chalcis was longer-lived: the sources I posted above refer to Ptolemy, Lysanias and Zenodorus as king, tetrarch or high priest of Iturea, and while their principality may be called after their capital at times, there is no evidence that they were distinct (Abiene may be another matter, though). The "Independent kingdom" and "Roman vassal state" sections of the page are virtually unsourced, but not even there a clear distinction is drawn. After that there is only the partition of Chalcis among many other territories between the Romans and Herodians, and the rest is simply the history of Chalcis as an individual city. Avilich (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Please stop edit warring, you're on the 3RR limit. Avilich (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Looks like you are, too. Please note that I didn't start it. I merely undid an arbitrary redirect initiated without discussion, with due attention to what appeared to be the main objection. I did invite/initiate a discussion myself (see above). The main response from you and others has been to repeat the objected-to behavior without adequate discussion to achieve a consensus. I suggest you examine your own behavior. That said, I have refrained from activity on the contested page. You ought to have, also. BPK (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Collections by Tim Powers edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Collections by Tim Powers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tim Powers edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tim Powers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Down and Out in Purgatory.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Down and Out in Purgatory.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

William Cecil Clayton edit

Hi there. It looks like you wrote most of William Cecil Clayton back in 2018, but there were no references added to the text. Can you please add some? --Joy (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:As the Green Star Rises.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:As the Green Star Rises.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:By the Light of the Green Star.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:By the Light of the Green Star.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:In the Green Star's Glow.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:In the Green Star's Glow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Under the Green Star.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Under the Green Star.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:When the Green Star Calls.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:When the Green Star Calls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Salamis-novel.jpg edit

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука13 21:07, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Skartaris for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skartaris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skartaris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and a reminder edit

Hi, thanks for expanding Bookshops & Bonedust. A reminder, that when an article has an established citation style from the first major contributor or other consensus, Wikipedia content guidelines suggest keeping the existing style. This includes not removing citation templates from articles that already use them and not moving citations from a reflist to the prose. Please see the subsection Wikipedia:Citing sources § To be avoided or the full section WP:WHENINROME for details. Cheers. —siroχo 20:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Castle of Terror edit

 

The article The Castle of Terror has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and tagged for notability since 2017. I find no academic sources whatsoever on google scholar for this title (but many about the horror film, or arthur Conan doyle).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply