Audrey1125
Get ready for November with Women in Red! edit
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Invitation to join WikiProject Military history edit
Jane Manning James edit
Hi, I removed your FAC nomination of Jane Manning James as being out of process. Per the FAC instructions, you should nominate only articles for which you are one of the primary contributors. It appears that most of that article was developed by BYU personnel a couple of years ago. --Laser brain (talk) 13:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- We haven't had a lot of luck with FAC nominations--do you think Jane Manning James is a good candidate? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Rachel Helps! I do think that she would be an excellent candidate for featured article, besides being a fascinating person, a movie just came out about her relationship with Emma Smith! Most of the issues with her page (in my opinion) dealt mainly with the use of primary sources, but I tracked down some articles and fixed the problem, but I guess I am not a consistent-enough editor of her article to nominate her...It would be fantastic if she could be, though! Audrey (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I noticed your edits, which have greatly improved the page's sourcing! My student worker who did most of the edits no longer works for me though, and I'm not sure if I qualify as a primary contributor either. How strict is the "primary sourcing" criterion, User:Laser_brain?Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Rachel Helps (BYU): Whoops, I forgot to reply to this. Primary sources can generally be used for basic facts about the subject that are unlikely to be the subject of disputes. When it comes to notable activities, secondary sources should be used as they tend to be neutral and dispassionate when writing about the subject. On the topic of primary contributors: We really just want to ensure that the nominator is familiar enough with the sources used in the article that they can answer questions, perform verification, and be able to address reviewer comments in FAC. So, access to the sources used to write the article is critical. There is also the question of "credit", which is another reason why the primary contributors should at least be given the opportunity to sign off on the nomination. --Laser brain (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I noticed your edits, which have greatly improved the page's sourcing! My student worker who did most of the edits no longer works for me though, and I'm not sure if I qualify as a primary contributor either. How strict is the "primary sourcing" criterion, User:Laser_brain?Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Rachel Helps! I do think that she would be an excellent candidate for featured article, besides being a fascinating person, a movie just came out about her relationship with Emma Smith! Most of the issues with her page (in my opinion) dealt mainly with the use of primary sources, but I tracked down some articles and fixed the problem, but I guess I am not a consistent-enough editor of her article to nominate her...It would be fantastic if she could be, though! Audrey (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red edit
|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
 January events:
|
Concern regarding Draft:Osborne Anderson edit
Hello, Audrey1125. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Osborne Anderson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Thelma porter edit
Hello, Audrey1125. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thelma porter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
 February events:
|
A page you started (Sex and Culture) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Sex and Culture.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The article should include content on the book's reception and legacy.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
March 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
April 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for April 22 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Becki Jayne Harrelson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Amanda and Samuel Chambers edit
Hello, Audrey1125,
Thanks for creating Amanda and Samuel Chambers! I edit here too, under the username Balon Greyjoy and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
This article doesn't address the notability of the Chambers, only that they were early members of the church. Please expand upon their work in the church, or beforehand, to demonstrate their notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Balon Greyjoy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Balon Greyjoy (talk) 06:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your recent contributions and your creation of the page Tan Cheng Hiong. Cheers! CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC) |
May you join this month's editathons from WiR! edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Gender-neutral article edit
Hello, Audrey1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gender-neutral article".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red! edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started edit
Thanks for creating Nobuyo Otagaki.
User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
While the Japan Times article is a good source, the other cited sources don't appear to be reliable: #2 is a blog (generally not considered reliable, see WP:BLOGS, #3 is an event announcement, and #4 appears to be promotional.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
August 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Ang Aklatan edit
Hello, Audrey1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ang Aklatan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 13:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Melissa Inouye edit
Hello, Audrey1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melissa Inouye".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
|
February with Women in Red edit
|
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red edit
| June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Washington Youth Climate Strike edit
Hello, Audrey1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Washington Youth Climate Strike".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red! edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons at Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red edit
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red edit
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons edit
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in August 2022 edit
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022 edit
|
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022 edit
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023 edit
|
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023 edit
|
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023 edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary edit
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023 edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women In Red edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023 edit
|
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023 edit
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023 edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024 edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red February 2024 edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging