Welcome!

Hello, Ariel el pleb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sony franchises edit

 Template:Sony franchises has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

THQ Nordic edit

Thanks for adding franchise to the THQ Nordic template, however, please remember to not add any games that just have a HD port or expansion as those categories do not count as sequels. Thank you. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 10:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Stop vandalizing the THQ Nordic template. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions on Video games edit

Hi Ariel el pleb, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Video games. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Sony franchises edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sony franchises, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Namcokid47 (talk) 01:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've removed a lot of your contributions to the THQ Nordic template edit

I've noticed that you were flooding the THQ Nordic template with entries of remastered THQ Nordic games ever since their acquisition of Koch Media. After an evaluation, I've removed the majority of your entries as they clogged up the navigation box. Please don't revert the edit. Thank you. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kadokawa Dwango franchises and overcategorization edit

Since it seems that you are going to include all individual articles in Category:Kadokawa Shoten manga into Category:Kadokawa Dwango franchises, it would be simpler and make Category:Kadokawa Shoten manga a subcategory of Category:Kadokawa Dwango franchises and not recategorized all articles in Category:Kadokawa Shoten manga per WP:SUBCAT. This would also avoid having overlapping categories. —Farix (t | c) 20:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

-Ok |Ariel

July 2018 edit

  Before adding a category to an article, as you did to 2012 (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

-Ok |Ariel

Page move edit

Your page Video games owned by THQ Nordic has been moved to List of video games published by THQ Nordic for consistency. Xevus11 (talk) 20:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why did you create List of video games published by THQ Nordic? edit

Seriously? what was the purpose of creating List of video games published by THQ Nordic? I'm concerned that you have an unhealthy obsession with the THQ Nordic page to the point where you're creating unwanted categories. We value your edits, and you've made some good contributions to this site, but some of the edits you've been making lately have been questionable. I'll tag @Lordtobi: to evaluate the edits that you're doing from hereon out regarding THQ Nordic. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Iftekharahmed96: You may just tag the page for AfD. Lordtobi () 10:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's propeties are interesting and simply am not satisfied with the categories, well I created because i'm boring

Sorry buddy, that's not a justifiable reason. if this sort of behaviour continues on then I'll have to report you for vandalism based edits. You can't just make edits just because you have the power to do so, edits have to improve the readability, bulk up the citations or context of the article you're editing. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok

List of franchises owned by WarnerMedia moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, List of franchises owned by WarnerMedia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).(See Rule 42) Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. Edaham (talk) 04:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok

September 2018 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 17:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Ariel el pleb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Ariel el pleb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Microsoft franchise edit

Please stop adding the category of Microsoft franchises to articles that are not franchises. Franchise has a very specific meaning and doesn't mean, owned or made one of. So please stop. Canterbury Tail talk 19:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Meh, ok, i know

Okay. Then please fix your mess. Also please use edit summaries when you make an edit, otherwise it just looks like vandalism. Canterbury Tail talk 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Done

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Canterbury Tail talk 02:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Okey, thanks for the tip

Category:Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992 film) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992 film), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 02:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994 film) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1994 film), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 02:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Meh, ok

Incorrect franchise categories. Again. edit

I see you are yet again adding inappropriate franchise categories to articles. The latest round seems to be adding Category:Nintendo franchises to articles that are not owned by Nintendo, such as this edit to Glory of Heracles. This is clearly incorrect as Nintendo didn't create it but that category is for ones that they did create. Please be more careful when adding categories as this seems to be a continued issue. Please revert these edits and clean up the edits.

Additionally you have been asked to use edit summaries but continue to refuse to do so. If you do not use edit summaries people won't understand why you made edits, and may confuse your edits for vandalism. Canterbury Tail talk 20:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

That sh#t of Glory of Heracles is a mess, ok i'm gonna fix them WOW, that was fast

Additionally remember that categories must be defining and must be supported by referenced material in the articles, per WP:CATVER. Do not add categories that are not supported by the articles. Canterbury Tail talk 20:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
I presume this is the same issue with this revision you made. I've since reverted but if you have references supporting this, please feel free to add them. Hiàn (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

List of Konami franchises edit

Recently I stumbled across this article that you made. Dude, you need to put in way, way more effort into this. This is just a jumbled mess of pages, including some that don't really belong there or even have pages, which I had removed. I'm gonna try fixing this myself, but please add something in like a table if you make another franchise list, instead of just a bulleted list; it's unprofessional and looks lazily hashed together. A good example is List of Square Enix franchises, which uses a table, shows the genre of each game, and features the release dates of the first entry and latest entry. Thank you. Namcokid47 (talk) 04:42, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

So you've been asked several times, and you've acknowledged the ask, that you use Edit Summaries otherwise people will think your edits are vandalism. I notice that even after your edits that you still refuse to use edit summaries. At this point this is starting to look liked deliberate disruptive editing. I must ask you again to please use edit summaries. If you continue to not use them, then it's possible you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 13:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm ever forgot about that thing. I'm sorry for that

So, you still haven't used an edit summary since the warning above. In fact out of 2056 edits, you've used an edit summary 9 times. Ever. That's 0.4% of your edits. At this point I'm starting to think you're edits could be heading towards disruptive as I mentioned above. I'm also beginning to question whether you understand the meaning of the term franchise. In the definition you seem to be using it would be "a set of creative works and related merchandise that share a fictional world, as films, television shows, books, or games:" A single TV series isn't a franchise. One game isn't a franchise. A book isn't a franchise. A TV series that has spin offs could be deemed a franchise, but not just the singular series. In the US sometimes a single series is occasionally described as a franchise, but not generally in the rest of the world. Plus I think you're starting to really over-categorize the article. Per WP:CATDEF a category must be a defining feature of the article subject, and regularly described as such. Most of the article's you're adding franchise categories to this is most likely not the case, and isn't supported by the article contents. Canterbury Tail talk 04:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I understand that, i'm gonna put some summary if necessary. Thank you.

January 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Sony Interactive Entertainment, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization Talk 23:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disney and Fox edit

Please don't automatically replace Fox-related categories with Disney characters. Futurama, for example, was still produced by Fox, and there's no sign that Disney will relabel everything produced by Fox as a Disney production. Trivialist (talk) 22:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

-I know Futurama was produced for Fox. But now 20th Television is part of Walt Disney Television, and Disney TV is a part of Disney Media Networks. It's just like with Marvel Studios, the company was part of Marvel Entertainment, but now is part of Walt Disney Studios

Franchises edit

Please don't categorizing works and media franchises into categories like "ExampleCo franchises" just because ExampleCo is somehow connected with a related product. They don't necessarily have any ownership in the franchise, and may just license the property. Trivialist (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:City Slickers has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:City Slickers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vietcong has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Vietcong, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ashita no Joe has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Ashita no Joe, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Nintendogs has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Nintendogs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:The Book of Unwritten Tales has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:The Book of Unwritten Tales, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Slapshdown (series) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Slapshdown (series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Safecracker (series) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Safecracker (series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Summoner (series) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Summoner (series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Stuntman (series) has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Stuntman (series), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:SuperPower has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:SuperPower, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 06:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Thunderful (company) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Thunderful (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I forgot this category, well, just do it.

"Let's Sing (video game series)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Let's Sing (video game series). Since you had some involvement with the Let's Sing (video game series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:32, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ariel el pleb, greetings. Pls note that stand alone lists need sources just like any other articles - pls see WP:STAND. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oops, i forget that, you can help me in that thing please.

Category:Silent Hill films has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Silent Hill films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 17:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS (January 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ariel el pleb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia (January 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:48, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS (March 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Little Women has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Little Women, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monthly Magazine Z, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayakashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of works published by Kodansha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secret Ambition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sony Pictures Television franchises has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Sony Pictures Television franchises has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:One Day at a Time has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:One Day at a Time has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 02:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of manga published by Kodansha edit

Hello, Ariel el pleb,

Thank you for creating List of manga published by Kodansha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add references; this is expected in all articles including list articles, per WP:SourceList.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve List of works published by Shogakukan edit

Hello, Ariel el pleb,

Thank you for creating List of works published by Shogakukan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add refs per WP:SourceList

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia (June 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Spicy (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Aura has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Aura has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Science Visual Novel has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Science Visual Novel has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AlexandraIDV 07:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"PlayStation Talents" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PlayStation Talents. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#PlayStation Talents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. IceWelder [] 01:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"SCEE R&D" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect SCEE R&D. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#SCEE R&D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. IceWelder [] 01:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"China Hero Project" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect China Hero Project. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#China Hero Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. IceWelder [] 01:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Embracer Group franchises edit

I saw you added the new Embracer Group franchises category to Homeworld (video game), and I think there's something off about how you made the category: you said the category is for franchises but then are sticking in individual video games. Moving the category to 'Embracer Group video games' would make more sense for how you're using it, or else only include franchise/series articles. --PresN 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The reason why I have done this is because some articles (like the ones for Homeworld, Pinball FX, de Blob, etc.) said that the games has sequels, I wanted to put the DragonVale one (DECA is the owner of the franchise and is part of Embracer) but there's no mention about the spin-offs of DragonVale, so I decided to don't do anything.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Codemasters franchises edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Codemasters franchises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good job, thanks

Category:Riddim Ribbon has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Riddim Ribbon has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 09:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Genji (series) has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Genji (series) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Motor Toon Grand Prix has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Motor Toon Grand Prix has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:49, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Famicom Tantei Club has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Famicom Tantei Club has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS edit

  Hello, Ariel el pleb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of libraries owned by ViacomCBS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia edit

  Hello, Ariel el pleb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maker Studios franchises edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Maker Studios franchises indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Inspector Gadget films has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Inspector Gadget films has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Balloon Fight has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Balloon Fight has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 01:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Another Code has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Another Code has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 01:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia edit

 

Hello, Ariel el pleb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of libraries owned by WarnerMedia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WarnerMedia Entertainment franchises edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:WarnerMedia Entertainment franchises indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:PJ Masks has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:PJ Masks has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 01:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Story of Ferdinand edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:The Story of Ferdinand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply