Your submission at Articles for creation: Harithah (Father of Zayd) (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Ahmed Alyi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 18:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Poonja Jinnah

edit
 

The article Poonja Jinnah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. Notability is not inherited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Poonja Jinnah for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poonja Jinnah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poonja Jinnah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caleb Murdock (August 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't know what your game is, but if you don't stop messing about, you will be blocked. DrKiernan (talk) 09:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheikh Liaquat (August 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 15:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating multiple accounts. Edits like these[1][2] and these[3][4] indicate that you are also Jan Abdul Karim Ahmed (talk · contribs). As both accounts are editing in the same topic area, within minutes of each other[5], there does not appear to be any valid reason for you to operate two accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DrKiernan (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply