January 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 06:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at G.o.d. - Arjayay (talk) 17:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Plz forgive me, Im sorry. Ive been getting my information from this article: "http://www.allkpop.com/article/2016/08/way-back-wednesday-god-groove-overdose"
Plz dotn remove anything. th article was too vague. As mention by your edit page. It only mention debut single, one variety show, and the comeback in 2014.76.174.35.70 (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Please read my post in reply to your post at my talk-page - Arjayay (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. Street (March 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 15:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

g.o.d edit

Your edits will be reverted on sight if you will continue to inlcude NPOV and puffery, badly sourced phrases like:

"g.o.d. had been considered to be an unusual group from the begining", "Undiscouraged", "The ballad, became the most requested song on the radio stations, as many people were able to relate to it during a time in which Korea suffered economically", "The other track, "Observation," was just enough to push them to the top of the pop charts, proving that the awkward lineup proved to be worthy in the end", "As the fans watched g.o.d. take care of the young boy, the ratings skyrocketed", "Despite all this, g.o.d. had remained a humble group as they produced album 4"

Snowflake91 (talk) 21:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyndago (March 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:42, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyndago (April 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 76.174.35.70, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. Street (May 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Seraphim System (talk) 10:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 in South Korean Music (May 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seraphim System was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Seraphim System (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:2005 in South Korean Music has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2005 in South Korean Music. Thanks! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 in South Korean Music (June 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: M. Street (July 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DrStrauss talk 09:35, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyndago (July 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcc was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, 76.174.35.70. You have new messages at Jcc's talk page.
Message added 20:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyndago (July 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 in South Korean Music (July 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Otterathome (talk) 00:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 in South Korean Music (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The seeeyyaaa and hiatus edit

hellow fellow kpoper !! So do u rly think it is important to add a hiatus section ? I found it pretty useless since groups goes on hiatus now and then and it's pretty random and insignificant.

Btw, the seeya disbanded in 2015 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Similardi (talkcontribs) 11:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I think it's important. It seperates disbandment from break. People thought g.o.d was disbanded this whole time. But it was confirmed back in 2005 to be hiatus. Sure enough, they came back in 2014. I feel like it puts out more rumors such as f(x) disbandment.-76.174.35.70 (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kara edit

Do not revert edits without discussion, they are disbanded according to many reliable sources (1, 2, 3, 4 etc.), just because one member said in a random interview that they're not disbanded and hope to release new music, that doesnt change anything. Also, "years active" in infobox means exactly that (years in which they are active), so do not change to 2007–present because they are not active anymore, even if they are maybe not legally disbanded, some groups never disbands but simply stop being active. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyndago (August 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Dead South Korean Musicians (September 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flow234 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flow 234 (Nina) talk 10:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:EXID (Project Group) concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:EXID (Project Group), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:EXID (Project Group) edit

 

Hello, 76.174.35.70. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EXID".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 13:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017 edit

  Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Abdotorg (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Um, Abdotorg? This is my account that I use when I log out. XD-K-popguardian (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:TOP TEEN concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TOP TEEN, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of dead South Korean musicians edit

 

The article List of dead South Korean musicians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMINATE list with a scope problem. Since all South Korean musicians will eventually be dead, the scope of this article is indiscernible from List of South Korean musicians in the long run. In the short run, being dead is not a particularly defining quality of people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 14:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:M. Street concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:M. Street, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:TOP TEEN edit

 

Hello, 76.174.35.70. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TOP TEEN".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:M. Street edit

 

Hello, 76.174.35.70. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "M. Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cyndago edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Cyndago, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

JnC edit

Hi. Please provide a rationale for proposing an article for deletion. Please see {{proposed deletion}}. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talkcontribs) 04:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Celebrate (EP). Binksternet (talk) 07:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about?-76.174.35.70 (talk) 13:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply