January 2018 edit

Wikipedia is not a forum. We don't want to hear your antisemitic rants.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --ChiveFungi (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

==

I am not sure WHO you are and why you are intruding in my wikipedia experience with your problematic attitude. Instead of making generalized statements about "wikipedia is not a forum" and "we do not want to hear your antisemetic rants" perhaps you can come up with a more civilized approach of why you think there is a problem and why you think I am the cause of that problem. Also, just out of curiosity, who told you Wikipedia is not forum. The talk pages of every topic ARE indeed a form of forum where people should be and ARE allowed to FREELY express their opinions, as long as of course they do so in a mature civilized way. Finally, who are the "we" who do not want to hear my "antisemetic rants"? Do you represent a group of people and who are they? Also can you define "antisemitic" in direct relationship to a quote attributed to me. I will be expecting your reply. But rest assured that if you continue to harrass me I will be the one who will file a complaint requesting that YOU are banned! Hopefully, you have the capacity to understand that what you did is extremely serious and will be handled in the most assertive way the law permits.

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ChiveFungi (talk) 16:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 16:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.47.251.172 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is all highly disturbing and probably unauthorized. First I receive a threatening message by this user ChiveFungi about being banned. No explanation why just insults and opinions. later, I realized he probably even removed my post in the talk (so there is no disruption in the main article) without justification, not saying what is exactly the issue, simply this " 'wikipedia is not a forum' and 'we do not want to hear your antisemitic rants' " which does not get any more biased than that. If you have an issue explain which part of my post was objectionable. Unilaterally making decision and carrying out actions without prior communication is the definition of a fascist behavior. Finally I am protested, requesting some explanations and the response is "your are banned". OK now I understand: If it is so difficult for you zionists-jews to accept that your ancestors played a major role in the african slave trade "industry" then fine, go ahead and use your fascist tactics and pretend you are the righteous and every body else is a bigot and an antisemite (a made up term and a misnomer for sure) simply because you disagree with the hard facts and not merely just my point of view. Never the less, the truth always comes to the surface no matter how hard you will try to suppress it and in Nat Turner's case the truth is that he was a slave owned by a jew, he was hunted down by militia predominantly consisted of jewish farmers and their shills, he was actually arrested by a jew and executed in the most savage way by a kangaroo court (no due process, no jury) which was held in a town then called Jerusalem (conveniently renamed in 1888 to Courtland) because it was founded in 1791 by european jews from England who settled in the region as farmers and slave traders. I does not get any more obvious than that and apparently ChiveFungi and NeilN are too heavily invested in protecting their zionist interests so wasting any more time is certainly not to my desire. Do whatever you want, simply put, by avoiding to confront the issue of jewish involvement in slavery and especially trying to suppress any voices asking for open and free debate by harrasing me (and others I'm sure) you are proving to anyone reading these lines that you are wrong and you are afraid of the truth. 69.47.251.172 (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Aside from your lack of understanding of how we word content and your clear intent to disrupt Wikipedia further, unblock requests are not for engaging in personal attacks and incivility toward others. Sorry, but as far as unblocking you - this isn't something I'd even consider right now. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

<ec>Put concisely, anti-Semitic trolling is not tolerated on Wikipedia. Abuse of this talkpage to post more of the same will result in revocation of talkpage access.Acroterion (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.47.251.172 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

you keep referring to "antisemitic trolling" but you have not listed not even ONE word that is such. Plus first you define what "antisemitic trolling" IS and then you "punish" users for alleged infractions. What you all doing, is such a concerted effort is disgraceful and against common sense principles of ethics. It is exactly what the late Professor Tony Martin talks about in his book the "Jewish onslaught". So pathetic it is beyond decency. Basically, you are interested in suppressing the fact of european jews migrating to pre USA America and being heavily engaged in the slave trade "industry". It is so blatantly fascist what you are doing that I am requesting that you permanently block me from this page, it is disgusting to even accidentally getting here! 69.47.251.172 (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Talkpage access revoked due to astounding lack of awareness concerning the terms "fascism" and "racism." Acroterion (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2018 edit

 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 NeilN talk to me 19:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply