August 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —αἰτίας discussion 22:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Arnel Pineda has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 18:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

June 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States v. Nixon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United States v. Nixon was changed by 216.250.156.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-02T19:37:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edits appear to be exclusively aimed at targeting and reverting those of another editor. Please explain why you feel this is necessary. Ckatzchatspy 22:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I appear to have another Wiki-stalker. This one seems to revert any of my edits, not just my reversions/adjustments of the 99. anon on Global Warming(TM) and related (in his mind, anyway) articles. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Don't feed the divas edit

... Wikipedia:Don't feed the divas ... 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.29.188 (talk)

Hello. 99.56.122.24 (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

You are clearly a WP:SOCK of 97.87.29.188 (talk · contribs). Blocking. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

30 day soft block for block evasion requested edit

30 day soft block for block evasion requested FYI I just requested a 30 day soft block for block evasion from this IP NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

User_talk:64.27.194.74#:-D edit

Per User_talk:64.27.194.74#:-D, Hello? 64.27.194.74 (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just wondering.... edit

I know Michigan very well and using geolocate get an idea of where your IP is based.... do you actually drive back and forth between St Joe, Kalamazoo, Grand Rapids, and so on just to get around the long list of sock-blocks? Is that worth the time and/or gas? Sigh. Well, probably the other editors besides myself that think you should be banned will just keep reverting what you post. Beats me why you bother. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is very confusing. Could you please go back to User_talk:NewsAndEventsGuy#Why_did_you_remove_this_from_Climate_change_in_the_United_States.3F?
216.250.156.66 (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Alf.laylah.wa.laylah. An edit that you recently made to Racial profiling seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked 2 edit

See #Blocked above. You are still clearly the same editor, who still has an active block, as the one-year block issued in 2012 (under a different IP) has been extended each time you violate it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Prove it. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Unnecessarily, unless you can find an admin willing to disagree.
If you would prefer to have all your entries in Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down removed, that would be acceptable. What is not acceptable is for there to be entries there from a then-blocked editor. Please let me know which you would prefer: struck out, or removed. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Those are not my choices. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 19:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Too bad. It is unacceptable for banned editors to have entries in Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down. If you can find another acceptable choice, I would go with it, even though it might be considered a violation on my part.
I have some errands to run. I should be back within 1-1/2 hours, have a chance to look here again, and be gone the rest of the night. Because I will not be very available, I have no objection if another admin, after consideration of your edit history, decides to unblock. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Current Events edit

The Current Events guidelines specifically say "Don't create subheaders linking to general topics or lists" so please don't do that, like you did here. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm DatGoodDude342. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. DatGoodDude342 14:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Ganbaruby. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to David Frum because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 22:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Moved to "Books" section. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply