198.23.5.30

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at 198.23.5.30, has made edits to Long Pants that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Introduction to Wikipedia

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. I believe I have been unfairly blocked from using Wikipedia----I am NOt creating "original content" and I would like another editor other than t he one who barred me to inspect things.. I have bene regularly contributing for about 18 months and 80% or better of my entries have been approved with no problem whatsoever.Please drop the block.I am NOT a "vandal",something for which there seems to be a very broad definition

Again, welcome! ElENdElA (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ride the High Country, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chopping Mall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I just cited one.I SAW this picture and these actors are listed in the credits. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Midnight Patrol, you may be blocked from editing. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I am NOT vandalizing,this is a Laurel and Hardy fan talking and I know my onions 198.23.5.30 (talk) 18:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Panama Hattie (film), you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 20:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stpo automatically thinking I don't know what I'm doing.My source is IMF,plus my own knowledge of films 198.23.5.30 (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Please see WP:BURDEN - reliable sources are necessary for verification and your personal knowledge of of films is not a reliable source. Uncredited roles require a source to verify them. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for a guide to citing sources. Waxworker (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Six of a Kind. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sons of the Desert, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sons of the Desert. see WP:BURDEN - uncredited roles require a reliable source for verfication Waxworker (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

It is NOT unsourced.You can find it in ANY reputable book on Laurel&Hardy 198.23.5.30 (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Reliable sources need to be cited when adding content per WP:BURDEN, saying that the information is in "ANY reputable book on Laurel&Hardy" is not a source - a specific book with specific page numbers would be nescessary for verification. Waxworker (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wildcat (Ted Grant), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 14:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Buster Keaton Story, you may be blocked from editing. Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

The remark by Keaton is well known, and t he film itself was regarded as a colossal dog. But it's not worth arguing over. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2025

Hello, I'm Sophisticatedevening. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Dick Tracy characters without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

The facts were accurate, but for some reason the font was all out of whack. can you reprint it the proper way? 198.23.5.30 (talk) 15:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King of the Roaring '20s: The Story of Arnold Rothstein. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Swingtime in the Movies. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Catalyzzt (talk) 14:58, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Hello, I'm Catalyzzt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Patsy (1964 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Catalyzzt (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Blazing Saddles, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Woman Hunter. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I SAW this movie on DVD and I will be replacing the accurate infromation. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content and original research. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

I must protest against the block.I have been contributing for 18 months and 80% or better of my entries have passed without complaint. I have seen every movie that I comment on and know my facts 198.23.5.30 (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

I'll appeal my "block" right here,and will do so daily until it is lifted.I fail to see your reasoning. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Again, I ask you to drop this bewildering and unnecessary "block" on my contributions. I have bene contributing for 18 months and 80% or better of my entries have been accepted AND left as they were over time. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 12:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Once again, iI sk you to remove an unjustified block on my contributions,as I have been an accurate contributor to t his site for a year and a half. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Again,I ask you to please drop this unnecessary block,as I have done nothing to earn it 198.23.5.30 (talk) 13:00, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Once again,I ask y ou to remove a block that serves no useful purpose and only serves to handicap one of your more long-term and generous contributors 198.23.5.30 (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Once again,I ask you to remove this unjust block 198.23.5.30 (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

You seem to think Wikipedia is here for you to share your knowledge. That is not the case; see WP:No original research. Time after time you have pushed your own viewpoint onto talk pages and articles. This one was unneeded trivia. This one was a lie as there are no books talking about Young's diabetes. This one is your trivial experience that has no bearing on the topic. This one is a disruptive insertion into another talk page discussion, changing the topic. This one is patent nonsense created by you: a hoax. This one is your own observation about watching a film. This one is trivial unpublished details from your own anecdote. This one is your own useless musings. Earlier in this thread you claimed that 80% of your contributions have been good. If you were driving on the road with 80% good decisions, you would be considered a dangerous hazard to others. But the way I see it, your contributions are 80% bad. Wikipedia should not be used as your own publishing platform. Binksternet (talk) 15:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

The talk pages are to EXCHANGE OPINIONS,whensomething would look out of sync in the actual article.That's why they're called

talk pages".I have seen EVERY MOVIE I comment on and I fill in the blanks accordingly.Your hostility amazes me. 198.23.5.30 (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Talk pages are for discussions aimed at improving the article. Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines says, "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject." Don't waste the community's time. Binksternet (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

I still request that the block be dropped as unnecessary 198.23.5.30 (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Again,I respectfully ask that this unnecessary block be removed 198.23.5.30 (talk) 13:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

---