124.246.125.221

May 2023

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:Amigao, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

I want to file a complaint against you for attacking me personally and smearing me of harassment.

What harassment is not

However, some editors seem to give "harassment" a much broader, and inappropriate, meaning encompassing normal and appropriate editing practices such as merely editing the same page as another user, or warning another user for disruption or incivility. Such activities are not harassment if done civilly and in good faith.

It is also not harassment to track a user's contributions for policy violations (see above); that is part of what editor contribution histories are for. Editors do not own article content, or their own edits, and any other editor has the right to revert edits as appropriate. Unwarranted resistance to such efforts may be a sign of ownership behavior and lead to sanctions.

Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment

124.246.125.221 (talk) 16:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 16:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

124.246.125.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Suddenly cut off and blocked in the middle of a debate on why I am accused of harassment. I asked for clarification on the charge and was blocked. No chance to engage in debate. I want to reply to the User Favonian on his talkpage but is now blocked. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Favonian for evidence of my good faith debate.124.246.125.221 (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Block is completely justified. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Using multiple IPs and an account to harass and to try to out another editor is not a "debate." Acroterion (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

124.246.125.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wait, now I am harassing User Favonian? How? I was asking him for clarification on the harassment charge and you suddenly swoop in and cut me off. You are blocking legitimate debate.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

124.246.125.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How is it "completely" justified? What is the reasoning? I feel it is totally unjustified.

Decline reason:

Looking at your revision deleted edits, you were outing somebody. PhilKnight (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---