Orgone's Wikihub:
Wikipsych
EvoWiki
Wiktionary
Wikinews
Wikisource
Wikispecies
Wikibooks
Wikiquote
Wikiversity
Wikimedia
Wikimedia Commons
Contact Orgone


William James
Name: Orgone
Occupation: Postgraduate Student of Philosophy
Specific interests: Philosophy of psychology / Mind, Metaphysics, Political Philosophy.
Currently watching/editing:
Orgone's Top Tip: Omniwiki! Look up any Wikipedia article directly from any web page by merely highlighting the word you want to know more about and clicking a button! Use this javascript as a link in your browser toolbar (make sure you get it all on one line, a simple Copy/Paste will probably only get the first line):
javascript:q = %22%22 + (window.getSelection ? window.getSelection() : document.getSelection ? document.getSelection() : document.selection.createRange().text); if (!q) q = prompt(%22Enter a Wikipedia topic:%22, %22%22); /* if (q!=null) { location=%22http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22 + escape(q).replace(/ /g, %22+%22);} void 0; */ if (q!=null) { WindowObjectReference = window.open(%22http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22 + escape(q).replace(/ /g, %22+%22), %22DescriptiveWindowName%22, %22resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes%22); } void 0;
When you highlight a word and click the link, a new window will open up with the Wikipedia article for that word! You can change the URL and have the link take you to Wiktionary definitions, or even just a Google search on the term (put in "http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=") So there it is, have fun with it!



  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.


This user is one of an infinite number of "monkeys" editing Wikipedia right now.
This user is a member of the Brights movement.
This user studies at or is an alumnus of the University of London
NOWThis user loves The Now Show and hates The Git Wizard.
4This user thinks BBC Radio 4 is worth the licence fee alone.
BBC World ServiceThis user listens to BBC World Service.
TRGSThis user listens to The Ricky Gervais Show and follows the wisdom of Karl Pilkington.
NewsThis user reads broadsheet newspapers.
Er...This user is (cont. page 94)
This user is an Aquarian.
This user believes that Astrology is a load of nonsense.