User:CatherineMunro/Wikihalo

Wikihalo nomination for CatherineMunro

Description of CatherineMunro

I nominate Catherine Munro. I nominate her for her hard work, key wiki support and her cheerful spirit.

My portal proposal

• She designed the http://www.wikipedia.org/ portal.
• She writes for the Wikipedia Signpost.
• She proposed and helped design the Special:Cite page.
• She wrote, edited, and supervised the climb of the Duran Duran article to featured article status. (I'm a big fan of Duran Duran).

By User:Evrik

T46328 More: CatherineMunro (talk · contribs)T46328out blocked

Acceptance of Nomination

If you are the candidate and wish to accept your nomination, please express that here:

I am surprised and honored to be nominated -- thank you! I am pleased to accept. — Catherine\^talk 22:33, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Votes

Please read Wikipedia:Wikihalo before voting.

The current tally is 32/0/0. Please update this if you vote. The voting will end at 17:02 10th March (UTC).

---

Support

1. SUPPORT evrik 17:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
2. SUPPORT The Neokid talk 17:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
3. Support even though the Signpost didn't pick my questions for Jimbo. I have good faith that the news about ads on the search results page will be investigated by Signpost staff in the future. --James S. 18:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
4. Support. She left a nice note on my talk page after I thanked her for the comment she left on the talk page for The Lovely Bones, the first really long article I created and wrote here. A very nice thing for such a busy and important person here to do. It's the little things that make a difference. Daniel Case 20:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
5. Support --M@thwiz2020 20:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
6. Support --Martyman-(talk) 20:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
7. support: Looks good and apparently quite deserving; longtime contributor with almost 10,000 edits, dedicated to building an encyclopedia. Ombudsman 22:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
8. support. villy ♦✎ 09:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
9. support. yeah, superduper. absolutely. ... aa:talk 19:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
10. Support. Great -- and underappreciated -- work on disambiguation pages! Ewlyahoocom 06:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
11. Support. Great Wikipedian! :) Gflores ^Talk 16:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
12. I must dreadfully oppose, since Catherine has failed to bring me coffee in the Newsroom. Coffee! Now, Signpost minion! Support Ral315 (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
13. Support -- Tvaughn05_e ^(Talk)_(Contribs) 22:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
14. Support Joe I 22:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
15. Support Nach0king 00:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC) Having read the requirements, and CatherineMunro's achievements, I have no hesitation in offering my support.
16. Support user:zanimum
17. Support Definitely, meets all the requirements. Banez 08:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
18. User:Go for it!/Vote Support Catherine is very kind, very helpful, and very friendly. Angelic. The only thing missing is an actual halo. Yes, please, give her one. --Go for it! 16:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
19. Support ^^AGREE'D--Gophergun 17:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
20. Support Excellent work. - File:Ottawa flag.png nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 20:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
21. Support good work, very worthy joshbuddy^talk 20:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
22. Support - Absolutely agree. Congratulations. 0:) Prsgoddess187 20:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
23. Support --Plumcouch 20:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
24. Support Great work--– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 20:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
25. Support Keep up the great work that you do! Va girl2468 20:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
26. Support I honestly had no idea who Catherine was or what Wikihalo was until User:Evrik pointed them both out to me today. After reading her user page and some of her work on the sign post among other large contributions and admiring her wiki philosphies and thoughts, I am confident that she is a perfect candidate for this! Good luck! --Naha|^(talk) 21:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
27. Support As for the previous commenter, User:Evrik pointed out Catherine's work and her nomination to me. Looking through her extensive contributions she seems highly deserving of recognition. Kymara 21:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
28. Support Morhange 23:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
29. Support Kyou 00:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
30. Support A diligent Wikipedian and a great role model Dawn22 02:16, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
31. Support Well deserving. South Philly 03:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
32. Support Wow! When I grow up I want to be CatherineMunro. :D Noelle De Guzman (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

• When can we move for unamimous consent? :) evrik 23:21, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I think we should after 20-30, it doesn't look like anyone's going to go against this. ^_^ --Gophergun 17:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

11 days left. The Neokid talk 18:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

• Eleven? Don't you mean four? evrik 20:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah. The Neokid talk 16:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Well, since I nominated her, I'm going to take the liberty of placing it on her page now that the time period is over. evrik 18:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

---