Hi!

I signed up to advocate for agriculture within the scope of Wikipedia. It is my strongest desire to try and help correct misinformation about farming while staying within Wikipedia's guidelines. I don't believe all editors have this same desire, particularly when it comes to neutral point of view, but I don't want to be seen as "that guy." I realize that since I am advocating, my viewpoints may not be the most neutral either, but I am willing to consider all viewpoints which are backed by solid, peer-reviewed, unbiased research. This, of course, is a higher standard than Wikipedia's verification policy, so I won't push it beyond what is according to the policy. After all, most editors here have way more experience here than I do! I guarantee that I will post any suggested changes (except minor ones like spelling) on an article's talk page before going through with the edit, just to give everyone a chance to make sure I'm being as neutral as possible.

I will do my best to help make this a more informative educational site, so if you see me going "outside the box" too much, I would welcome any constructive comments.

Thanks! Adv4Ag