Modulated neutron initiator
A modulated neutron initiator is a neutron source capable of producing a burst of neutrons on activation. It is a crucial part of some nuclear weapons, as its role is to "kick-start" the chain reaction at the optimal moment when the configuration is prompt critical. It is also known as an internal neutron initiator. The initiator is typically placed in the center of the plutonium pit, and is activated by impact of the converging shock wave.
One of the key elements in the proper operation of a nuclear weapon is initiation of the fission chain reaction at the proper time. To obtain a significant nuclear yield, sufficient neutrons must be present within the supercritical core at the right time. If the chain reaction starts too soon ("predetonation"), the result will be only a 'fizzle yield', well below the design specification, therefore low spontaneous neutron emission of the pit material is crucial. If it occurs too late, the core will have begun to expand and disassemble into a less-dense state, leading to a lowered yield (less of the core material undergoes fission) or no yield at all (the core is no longer a critical mass).
As a general rule, 80 generations of neutron multiplication, in a nuclear (e.g. heavy water) fission reactor, are required in order to achieve explosion-yield equivalent; it must be achieved cca. yield of first 40 neutron generations, in order for a nuclear weapon to be "properly activated."
For boosted fission weapons, the size of the centrally placed initiator is critical and has to be as small as possible. The use of an external neutron source allows more flexibility, such as variable yields.
The usual design is based on a combination of beryllium-9 and polonium-210, separated until activation, then placed in intimate contact by the shock wave. Polonium-208 and actinium-227 were also considered as alpha sources. The isotope used must have strong alpha emissions and weak gamma emissions, as gamma photons can also knock neutrons loose and cannot be so efficiently shielded as alpha particles. Several variants were developed, differing by the dimensions and mechanical configuration of the system ensuring proper mixing of the metals.
Urchin was the code name for the internal neutron initiator, a neutron generating device that triggered the nuclear detonation of the earliest plutonium atomic bombs such as The Gadget and Fat Man, once the critical mass had been 'assembled' by the force of conventional explosives.
The initiator used in the early devices, located at the center of the bomb's plutonium pit, consisted of a beryllium pellet, and a beryllium shell with polonium between the two. The pellet, 0.8 cm in diameter, was coated with nickel and then a layer of gold. The beryllium shell was of 2 cm outer diameter with wall thickness of 0.6 cm. The inner surface of that shell had 15 concentric, wedge-shaped latitudinal grooves and was, like the inner sphere, coated with gold and nickel. A small amount of polonium-210 (50 curies, 11 mg) was deposited in the grooves of the shell and on the central sphere: the layers of gold and nickel served to shield the beryllium from alpha particles emitted by the polonium. The whole urchin weighed about 7 grams and was attached to mounting brackets in a 2.5 cm diameter inner cavity in the pit.
When the shock wave from the implosion of the plutonium core arrives, it crushes the initiator. Hydrodynamic forces acting on the grooved shell thoroughly and virtually instantly mix the beryllium and polonium, allowing the alpha particles from the polonium to impinge on the beryllium atoms. Reacting to alpha particle bombardment, the beryllium atoms emit neutrons at a rate of about 1 neutron each 5–10 nanoseconds (See Beryllium#Nuclear properties). These neutrons trigger the chain reaction in the compressed supercritical plutonium. Placing the polonium layer between two large masses of beryllium ensures contact of the metals even if the shock wave turbulence performs poorly.
The grooves in the inner surface of the shell shaped the shock wave into jets by the Munroe effect, similar to a shaped charge, for fast and thorough mixing of the beryllium and polonium. As the Munroe effect is less reliable in linear geometry, later designs used a sphere with conical or pyramidal inner indentations instead of linear grooves. Some initiator designs omit the central sphere, being hollow instead. The advantage of a hollow design is possibly managing a smaller size while retaining reliability.
The short half-life of polonium (138.376 days) required frequent replacement of initiators and a continued supply of polonium for their manufacture, as their shelf life was only about 4 months. Later designs had shelf life as long as 1 year.
The US government used Postum as a code name for polonium.
Use of polonium for the neutron initiator was proposed in 1944 by Edward Condon. The initiator itself was designed by James L. Tuck, and its development and testing was carried out at Los Alamos National Laboratory in "Gadget" division's initiator group led by Charles Critchfield.
A different initiator (code named ABNER) was used for the Little Boy uranium bomb. Its design was simpler and it contained less polonium. It was activated by the impact of the uranium projectile to the target. It was added to the design as an afterthought and was not essential for the weapon's function.
An improved construction of the initiator, probably based on conical or pyramidal indentations, was proposed in 1948, put into production by Los Alamos in January 1950, and tested in May 1951. The TOM design used less polonium, as the number of neutrons per milligram of polonium was higher than of the Urchin. Its outer diameter was only 1 cm. The first live fire test of a TOM initiator occurred on 28-Jan-1951 during the Baker-1 shot of Operation Ranger. A series of calibration experiments for initiation time vs yield data of the TOM initiators was done during the Operation Snapper, during the Fox test on 25 May 1952.
In 1974, India performed the Smiling Buddha nuclear test. The initiator, codenamed "Flower", was based on the same principle as the Urchin. It is believed the polonium was deposited on lotus-shaped platinum gauze to maximize its surface and enclosed in a tantalum sphere surrounded by uranium shell with embedded beryllium pellets. According to other sources, the design was yet more similar to the Urchin, with a beryllium shell shaped to create beryllium jets upon implosion. The initiator outer diameter is reported as 1.5 cm, or "about 2 cm".
The polonium used in the urchin initiator was created at Oak Ridge and then extracted and purified as part of the Dayton Project under the leadership of Charles Allen Thomas. The Dayton Project was one of the various sites comprising the Manhattan Project.
In 1949 Mound Laboratories in nearby Miamisburg, Ohio opened as a replacement for the Dayton Project and the new home of nuclear initiator research & development. Polonium-210 was produced by neutron irradiation of bismuth. Production and research of polonium at Mound was phased out in 1971.
Polonium from Dayton was used by the G Division of Los Alamos in initiator design studies at a test site in Sandia Canyon. The initiator group built test assemblies by drilling holes in large turbine ball bearings, inserting the active material, and plugging the holes with bolts. These test assemblies were known as screwballs. The test assemblies were imploded and their remains studied to examine how well the polonium and beryllium mixed.
The production of the beryllium-polonium TOM initiators ended in 1953. The initiators were replaced with a different design, which slightly reduced the weapon yield but its longer shelf life reduced the complexity of the logistics. The sealed neutron initiator, brought into inventory in late 1954, still required a periodic disassembly to access its capsule for maintenance checks. The capsules were phased out completely in 1962.
Urchin style initiators were later superseded by other means of generating neutrons such as pulsed neutron emitters that do not use polonium. Having no radioactive materials, they didn't require frequent replacement on that account. These were generally mounted outside the pit, since neutrons easily pass through considerable mass without interactions. Also, the hollow core was needed to support a boosted fission weapon which injected gaseous deuterium and tritium mixture into the center. These initiators were more controllable and led to much improved weapon reliability.
- Nuclear Weapons FAQ, Section 4.1, Version 2.04: 20 February 1999
- The Design of Gadget, Fat Man, and "Joe 1" (RDS-1) Archived 2010-02-10 at the Wayback Machine. Cartage.org.lb. Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- On the Origins of the Soviet Atomic Project. Nuclearweaponarchive.org (1998-04-15). Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- Nuclear Weapons FAQ, Section 8.0, Version 2.18: 3 July 2007
- 4.1 Elements of Fission Weapon Design. Nuclearweaponarchive.org (1953-05-19). Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- Abrahamson|The Sandia Pioneers. Unc.edu. Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- Injecting Polonium into Humans, Federation of American Scientists, December 12th, 2006 by Steven Aftergood
- Ferenc Morton Szasz (1992). British scientists and the Manhattan Project: the Los Alamos years. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 24–. ISBN 978-0-312-06167-8. Retrieved 22 April 2011.
- "The Manhattan Project and predecessor organizations". Array of Contemporary American Physicists. American Institute of Physics. Archived from the original on 2012-10-17. Retrieved 2013-03-11. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Carey Sublette, Section 8.0 The First Nuclear Weapons, The Nuclear Weapon Archive : A Guide to Nuclear Weapons (July 3, 2007).
- India's Nuclear Weapons Program – Smiling Buddha: 1974. Nuclearweaponarchive.org. Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
-  Archived June 4, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- Uranium Deuteride Initiators. ArmsControlWonk (2009-12-14). Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- Polonium. Globalsecurity.org (2005-04-27). Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Richard Rhodes, 1986, Simon & Schuster, ISBN 0-684-81378-5 p. 580
- Note by the secretary, Subject: part III – Weapons Progress Report to the Joint Committee, June – November 1953 . Retrieved on 2010-02-08.
- United States Nuclear Weapons. Globalsecurity.org. Retrieved on 2010-02-08.