A ridesharing company (also known as a transportation network company, ride-hailing service; the vehicles are called app-taxis or e-taxis) is a company that, via websites and mobile apps, matches passengers with drivers of vehicles for hire that, unlike taxicabs, cannot legally be hailed from the street.
The legality of ridesharing companies by jurisdiction varies; in some areas they have been banned and are considered to be illegal taxicab operations. Regulations can include requirements for driver background checks, fares, caps on the number of drivers in an area, insurance, licensing, and minimum wage.
Ridesharing vs. ridehailingEdit
The term "ridesharing" has been used by many international news sources, including The Washington Post, CNN, BBC News, The New York Times, the Associated Press, and the Los Angeles Times. Groups representing drivers, including Rideshare Drivers United and The Rideshare Guy (Harry Campbell), also use the term "rideshare", since "hailing" rideshare cars from the street is illegal. Usage is inconsistent, with the same publication or the same article sometimes using both "ridesharing" and "ridehailing".
In January 2015, the Associated Press Stylebook, the collective that sets many of the news industry's grammar and word use standards, officially adopted the term "ride-hailing" to describe the services offered by Lyft and Uber, claiming that "ridesharing" doesn't accurately describe the services since not all rides are shared, and "ride-sourcing" only is accurate when drivers provide rides for income. While the Associated Press recommended the use of "ride-hailing" as a term, it noted that, unlike taxicabs, ridesharing companies cannot pick up street hails.
Service is generally accessed via mobile app. Users set up a personal profile with a name, phone number, other information, and payment preference, which could be a credit card, e-commerce payment system or, in some cases, cash. After the service is complete, the customer may be given the option to provide a gratuity to the driver, which is also billed to the customer's payment method.
The status of drivers as independent contractors is an unresolved issue. Drivers provide a vehicle, which could be owned, rented, or leased. Drivers must meet requirements for age, health, car age and type, have a driver's license and a smartphone or tablet, and may be required to pass a background check. In many cities, vehicles must pass annual safety inspections and/or must have an emblem posted in the passenger window. Some cities also require drivers to have a business license. There may be accommodations for hearing-impaired drivers. Drivers may be notified before accepting a trip if it will be longer than 45 minutes. After each transaction, drivers and customers may rate each other and users with low ratings may be deactivated.
A 2006 report by the Federal Transit Administration of the United States Department of Transportation stated that "next day" responsiveness has been achieved but that "dynamic" ridematching has not yet been successfully implemented.
In 2013, California became the first state to regulate such companies; they are regulated as public utilities by the California Public Utilities Commission and the legal term used is "transportation network companies".
Increased traffic congestion, carbon emissions, and reduced usage of public transportEdit
Studies have shown that ridesharing has increased traffic congestion in cities where extensive public transport networks are in place. Many people who use these services would otherwise be using public transport. Taxicabs were noted to have lower rider waiting time and vehicle empty driving time, and thus contribute less to congestion and pollution in downtown areas. However, another report noted that these companies serve as complements to public transit.
Most rideshare rides are currently made at a loss to the company and subsidized by investors. Public transportation advocates worry that, if public systems atrophy due to the competition, they will be unavailable if rideshare companies run out of investor funds and begin offering rides at cost.
Ridesharing may as a result contribute to automobile dependency.
More service in poorer areas and downward pressure on faresEdit
Preference for on-demand ride-hailing during COVID-19Edit
A survey involving commuters showed that there were statistically significant differences in mode preferences prior to, and during the outbreak of COVID-19 in urban Ghana. The results suggest that more people (59.0%) were willing to opt for on-demand ride-hailing options during the pandemic, in comparison to the 30.0% that would have opted for it prior to the pandemic. This however came at the detriment of the most common public transport form which experienced a decline from 64.0% to 28.6%. This change in preference for ride-hailing was also observed to be consistent across all age groups. This study was significant in showing the impact of COVID-19 on traveler mode preferences despite the constancy in travel cost and time during the outbreak of the virus.
Possible reduction in drunk drivingEdit
Studies are inconclusive on whether drunk driving rates have declined, with some studies showing that it depends on the city.
Decline in value of taxi medallionsEdit
Values of taxi medallions, transferable permits or licenses authorizing the holder to pick up passengers for hire, have declined in value significantly. A couple of credit unions that lent money secured by medallions suffered from bank failure.
Treatment of driversEdit
Classification as independent contractorsEdit
Unless otherwise required by law, drivers are generally independent contractors and not employees. This designation affects taxation, work hours, and overtime benefits. Lawsuits have been filed by drivers alleging that they are entitled to the rights and remedies of being considered "employees" under employment law. However, drivers do receive certain flexibilities that are not common among employees.
In O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on August 16, 2013, Uber drivers pleaded that according to the California Labor Code they should be classified as employees and receive reimbursement of business expenses such as gas and vehicle maintenance costs. In March 2019, Uber agreed to pay $20 million to settle the case.
On October 28, 2016, in the case of Aslam v Uber BV, the Central London Employment tribunal ruled that Uber drivers are "workers", not self-employed, and are entitled to the minimum wage under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998, paid holiday, and other entitlements. Two Uber drivers had brought the test case to the employment tribunal with the assistance of the GMB Union, on behalf of a group of drivers in London. Uber appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; in February 2021, the court ruled that drivers should be classified as workers and not self-employed. Uber drivers won the right to minimum wage, holiday pay, and protection from discrimination in the ruling. After losing three previous court cases, the company had appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that its drivers were independent contractors.
In March 2018, the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research of Switzerland ruled that drivers should be classified as employees.
In April 2018, the Supreme Court of California ruled in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court that Dynamex, a delivery company, misclassified its delivery drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This ultimately led to California passing Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) on September 11, 2019, with a test to determine if a tasker must be classified as an employee and receive minimum wage protections and unemployment benefits. In December 2019, Uber and Postmates sued California, claiming AB5 is unconstitutional. In 2020, they spent tens of millions of dollars campaigning in support of California's Proposition 22, which passed, granting them a special exception to Assembly Bill 5 by classifying their drivers as "independent contractors", exempting employers from providing benefits to certain drivers.
In November 2019, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development determined that drivers should be classified as employees and fined Uber $650 million for overdue unemployment and disability insurance taxes.
In March 2021, the UK Supreme Court ruled that Uber has to classify all of its drivers not as independent contractors but as workers, complete with the standard benefits. This includes minimum wage and holiday pay with other potential benefits depending on the contracts.
Compliance with minimum wage lawsEdit
In some jurisdictions, drivers are guaranteed a minimum wage, such as in New York City, where drivers must earn $26.51/hour before expenses or $17.22/hour after expenses. Analyses have shown that absent such laws, many drivers earn less than the stated minimum wage. A May 2018 report by the Economic Policy Institute found the average hourly wage for drivers to be $9.21. Reports of poor wages have been published in Profil, Trend, and The Guardian. A 2017 report claimed that only 4% of all Uber drivers were still working as such one year after starting, primarily due to low pay.
However, a 2019 study found that "drivers earn more than twice the surplus they would in less-flexible arrangements."
Crimes have been committed by rideshare drivers as well as by individuals posing as rideshare drivers who lure unsuspecting passengers to their vehicles by placing an emblem on their car or by claiming to be a passenger's expected driver. The latter led to the murder of Samantha Josephson and the introduction of Sami’s Law. Lawsuits claim that rideshare companies did not take necessary measures to prevent sexual assault. Rideshare companies have been fined by government agencies for violations in their background check processes.
Because it increases the number of people riding in automobiles instead of safer forms of transportation, a study from the Becker Friedman Institute at the University of Chicago tied ridesharing to an increase in traffic fatalities, including pedestrian deaths.
Ridesharing has also been criticized for encouraging or requiring phone use while driving. To accept a fare, drivers must tap their phone screen, usually within 15 seconds after receiving a notification, which is illegal in some jurisdictions since it could result in distracted driving.
It is unclear if rideshare vehicles are less or more safe than taxicabs. Major cities in the United States don't have much data on taxi-related incidents. However, in London, data from Transport for London shows that in 2018, there were 21 Taxi and Private Hire journey-related sexual offences where a driver was charged, involving 17 individual drivers. More than half of the drivers involved, 11, were Uber drivers, one was a licensed taxi driver, one an unlicensed driver and the rest related to drivers affiliated with other private hire vehicle operators.
Dynamic pricing and price fixing allegationsEdit
Due to dynamic pricing models, prices for the same route may vary based on the supply and demand for rides at the time the ride is requested. When rides are in high demand in a certain area and there are not enough drivers in such area, fares increase to get more drivers to that area. In some cases, this resulted in extreme surcharges during emergencies such as Hurricane Sandy, the 2014 Sydney hostage crisis, and the 2017 London Bridge attack.
Ridesharing has been criticized for providing inadequate accessibility measures for disabled people compared to the public transit it displaces.
In some areas, vehicle for hire companies are required by law to have a certain amount of wheelchair accessible vans (WAVs) in use. However, most drivers do not own a WAV, making it hard to comply with the laws.
While companies have strict requirements to transport service animals, drivers have been criticized for refusal to transport service animals, which, in the United States, is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In one case, this resulted in a lawsuit, which was referred to arbitration. The case was eventually ruled in favor of the visually impaired passenger, Lisa Irving, with Uber ordered to pay her out $1.1 million.
Bias against minority passengersEdit
Complaints that passengers in certain demographic groups were discriminated against by drivers have prompted services like Uber and Lyft to remove identity information from advertised rides. However, once a ride is accepted, the driver gets the name and photo of the passenger, along with other information. A 2018 study in Washington, DC, found that compared to other passengers, drivers more frequently cancelled rides for African American passengers and LGBTQ and ally passengers (indicated by a rainbow flag), but cancelled at the same rate for women and men. The higher cancellation rate for African American passengers (only) was somewhat attenuated at peak times, when financial incentives were higher.
- Dickenson, Greg (June 26, 2018). "How the world is going to war with Uber". The Daily Telegraph.
- "Lyft IPO: Ridesharing startup outlines all the reasons why it could fail". The Washington Post. April 13, 2019. Archived from the original on 2019-04-13.
- "New bill would make rideshare drivers benefits-eligible". CNN. September 11, 2019.
- Lee, Dave (March 29, 2019). "For Uber and Lyft, reality is arriving soon". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2019-07-27.
- Weed, Julie (August 19, 2019). "Ride Sharing Adds to the Crush of Traffic at Airports". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2019-08-27.
- Ronayne, Kathleen (August 29, 2019). "Rideshare, delivery apps pledge $90M California ballot fight". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2019-09-28.
- "IPO duds at Peloton, Endeavor give Wall Street bankers another black eye". Los Angeles Times. September 27, 2019.
- MYERS, JOHN; BHUIYAN, JOHANA; ROOSEVELT, MARGOT (September 18, 2019). "Newsom signs bill rewriting California employment law, limiting use of independent contractors". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2019-10-05.
- Scheiber, Noam; Conger, Kate (September 20, 2019). "Uber and Lyft Drivers Gain Labor Clout, With Help From an App". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2019-10-03.
- Campbell, Harry. "Is It Rideshare, Ride-Hail or Something Else?". Forbes. Archived from the original on 2016-11-11.
- Roof, Katie. "Uber Is Close to Buying Dubai Ride-Sharing Company". The Wall Street Journal.
- Warzel, Charlie (January 8, 2015). "Let's All Join The AP Stylebook In Killing The Term 'Ride-Sharing'". BuzzFeed.
- Freed, Benjamin (June 30, 2015). "Why You Shouldn't Call Uber and Lyft "Ride-Sharing"". Washingtonian.
- Wells, Georgia; MacMillan, Douglas (April 15, 2016). "Uber, Lyft Drivers Need Business Licenses to Operate in San Francisco". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660.
- Alba, Davey (May 28, 2015). "Uber unveils app update to help its deaf drivers". Wired.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (May 29, 2019). "Uber will now deactivate riders with below average ratings". The Verge.
- Chan, Nelson D.; Shaheen, Susan A. (November 4, 2011). "Ridesharing in North America: Past, Present, and Future" (PDF). University of California, Berkeley.
- "ADVANCED PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: THE STATE OF THE ART UPDATE 2006" (PDF).
- Scott, Alec (November 19, 2015). "Co-founding Uber made Calgary-born Garrett Camp a billionaire". Canadian Business.
- Said, Carolyn (December 29, 2015). "Ride-sharing pioneer Sidecar to shut down ride, delivery service". San Francisco Chronicle.
- Farr, Christina (May 23, 2013). "Lyft team gets $60M more; now it must prove ride-sharing can go global". VentureBeat.
- BASHIR, OMER (February 15, 2016). "Uber-clone vows safe, affordable ride. Should you Careem around Karachi, Lahore?". Dawn.
- Geron, Tomio (September 9, 2013). "California Becomes First State To Regulate Ridesharing Services [Lyft], Sidecar, UberX". Forbes.
- Diao, Mi; Kong, Hui; Zhao, Jinhua (2021-02-01). "Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility". Nature Sustainability: 1–7. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00678-z. ISSN 2398-9629.
- Schaller, Bruce (2021-03-01). "Can sharing a ride make for less traffic? Evidence from Uber and Lyft and implications for cities". Transport Policy. 102: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.015. ISSN 0967-070X.
- Saval, Nikil. "Uber and the Ongoing Erasure of Public Life". The New Yorker. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
- Fitzgerald Rodriguez, Joe (December 11, 2016). "SF blasts Uber, Lyft for downtown traffic congestion". The San Francisco Examiner.
- Fitzsimmons, Emma G.; Hu, Winnie (March 6, 2017). "The Downside of Ride-Hailing: More New York City Gridlock". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- "The New Automobility: Lyft, Uber and the Future of American Cities" (PDF). Schaller Consulting. July 25, 2018.
- Wolfe, Sean (July 27, 2018). "Uber and Lyft are creating more traffic and congestion instead of reducing it, according to a new report". Business Insider.
- Agarwal, Saharsh; Mani, Deepa; Telang, Rahul (2020). "The Impact of Ride-hailing Services on Congestion: Evidence from Indian Cities". SSRN.
- Badger, Emily (October 16, 2017). "Is Uber Helping or Hurting Mass Transit?". The New York Times.
- Zhang, Ruda; Ghanem, Roger (2019). "Demand, Supply, and Performance of Street-Hail Taxi". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 21 (10): 4123–4132. arXiv:1909.12861. Bibcode:2019arXiv190912861Z. doi:10.1109/TITS.2019.2938762. S2CID 203593159.
- Hall, Jonathan D.; Palsson, Craig; Price, Joseph (November 1, 2018). "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?" (PDF). Journal of Urban Economics. 108: 36–50. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.003. ISSN 0094-1190.
- Liang, Jiayu (Spring 2020). "Ride-Hailing: Convenience at What Cost?" (PDF). Catalyst. 20: 10.
- Siddiqui, Faiz. "Metro plan would subsidize Uber and Lyft fares to fill late-night service gap". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- Sammon, Alexander (13 August 2019). "When Cities Turn to Uber, Instead of Buses and Trains". The American Prospect. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- Dzisi, Emmanuel Komla; Ackaah, Williams; Aprimah, Benjamin Apuseyine; Adjei, Emmanuel (March 1, 2020). "Understanding demographics of ride-sourcing and the factors that underlie its use among young people". Scientific African. 7: e00288. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00288. ISSN 2468-2276.
- McArdle, Megan (July 20, 2015). "Uber Serves the Poor by Going Where Taxis Don't". Bloomberg News.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (October 4, 2017). "Does Uber lead to less drunk driving? It's complicated". The Verge. Vox Media.
- Berger, Paul; Gottfried, Miriam (January 17, 2018). "Hedge Fund Bets on Beaten-Up New York Taxi Business". The Wall Street Journal.
- Tansey, Bernadette (July 17, 2015). "Sharing Economy Companies Sharing the Heat in Contractor Controversy". Xconomy.
- "The gig-economy: Uber good or Uber bad?". Canadian Labour Congress. May 12, 2015.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (March 12, 2019). "Uber settles driver classification lawsuit for $20 million". The Verge.
- Griswold, Alison (October 28, 2016). "A British court rules Uber drivers have workers' rights in the "employment case of the decade"". Quartz.
- Between (1) Mr Y Aslam (2) Mr J Farrar & Others and (1) Uber B.V. (2) Uber London Ltd (3) Uber Britannia Ltd (PDF) (Report). Employment Tribunals. 28 October 2016. Case Nos: 2202550/2015 & Others.
- Russon, Mary-Ann (February 19, 2021). "UK Supreme Court rules Uber drivers are workers". BBC News.
- Thompson, Rachel. "Uber loses its final appeal in UK Supreme Court in landmark ruling". Mashable. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
- "Swiss authorities say Uber drivers should be treated as 'employees'". Swissinfo. March 19, 2018.
- "California's top court makes it more difficult for employers to classify workers as independent contractors". Los Angeles Times. May 1, 2018.
- McGee, Patrick (31 December 2019). "Uber and Postmates sue California over labour law". Financial Times.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on November 4, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on September 12, 2020. Retrieved November 4, 2020.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Luna, Taryn (4 November 2020). "California voters approve Prop. 22, allowing Uber and Lyft drivers to remain independent contractors". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- "Uber has to pay New Jersey nearly $650 million in employment taxes". Engadget. 14 November 2019. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 9 April 2021.
- Korosec, Kirsten; Lomas, Natasha (17 March 2021). "Uber says it will treat UK drivers as workers in wake of Supreme Court ruling". Archived from the original on 8 April 2021. Retrieved 6 April 2021.
- Brustein, Joshua (December 4, 2018). "New York Sets Nation's First Minimum Wage for Uber, Lyft Drivers". Bloomberg News.
- "Uber and the labor market". Economic Policy Institute. May 15, 2018.
- "Österreich Die Straßenkämpfer: Ein Uber-Fahrer-Report". Profil. 24 May 2018.
- "Taxi-Konkurrent Uber: Am Rande des Gesetzes". Trend. 2015.
- "'I made $3.75 an hour': Lyft and Uber drivers push to unionize for better pay". The Guardian. March 22, 2019.
- "Only 4% of Uber drivers remain on the platform a year later, says report". CNBC. 20 April 2017.
- Chen, M. Keith; Chevalier, Judith A.; Rossi, Peter E.; Oehlsen, Emily (December 1, 2019). "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers" (PDF). Journal of Political Economy. 127 (6): 2735–2794. doi:10.1086/702171. ISSN 0022-3808. S2CID 158944594.
- "Beirut killing reignites concerns about Uber safety". Financial Times. December 19, 2017.
- "They Thought It Was Their Uber. But the Driver Was a Predator". The New York Times. April 4, 2019.
- Holmes, Aaron (October 25, 2019). "More than 30 women are suing Lyft, saying the company didn't do enough to protect them from sexual assault and kidnapping". Business Insider.
- Kerr, Dara (October 24, 2019). "Lyft is fostering a sexual assault 'epidemic,' victims say". CNET.
- Yurieff, Kaya (November 20, 2017). "Uber fined $8.9 million in Colorado for problematic background checks". CNN.
- "Lyft fined after hiring driver with felony convictions". KKTV. January 13, 2018.
- Spielman, Fran (February 6, 2020). "Aldermen crack down on ride-hailing safety". Chicago Sun Times.
- "The Cost of Convenience: Ridehailing and Traffic Fatalities". Becker Friedman Institute. University of Chicago. 19 March 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
- Bliss, Laura (26 October 2018). "Does More Ride-Hailing Mean More Traffic Deaths?". Bloomberg CityLab. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
- Jacks, Timna (January 11, 2019). "Uber drivers complain they are forced to break the law to do their job.So that means that the drivers put the passenger in danger to which is against the law". Sydney Morning Herald.
- Annear, Steve (March 1, 2019). "'Fed up' cyclists send letter to Uber, Lyft asking drivers to stop obstructing bike lanes - The Boston Globe". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- Fitzsimmons, Emma G. (10 March 2020). "More Pedestrians and Cyclists are Dying in N.Y.C. Drivers are Often to Blame". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- Lipson, Vivian (5 August 2019). "It's Not Your Imagination: Uber and Lyft Drivers Almost Always Park in Bike Lanes". Streetsblog New York City. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
- Transport for London (June 21, 2021). "TPH journey-related sexual offences". Transport for London. Retrieved June 21, 2021.
- Newcomer, Eric (May 15, 2017). "Uber Starts Charging What It Thinks You're Willing to Pay". Bloomberg News.
- Kerr, Dara (August 23, 2015). "Detest Uber's surge pricing? Some drivers don't like it either". CNET.
- Carson, Biz (June 23, 2016). "Uber will stop showing the surge price that it charges for rides". Business Insider.
- Bosker, Bianca (October 31, 2012). "Uber Rethinks New York 'Surge Pricing,' But Doubles Driver Pay". HuffPost.
- Mazza, Ed (December 15, 2014). "Uber Raises Fares During Sydney Hostage Crisis, Then Offers Free Rides". HuffPost.
- "Uber has refunded passengers after London Bridge terror attack". BBC News. June 5, 2017.
- Paul, Sanjukta (October 19, 2019). "The Firm Exemption and the Hierarchy of Finance in the Gig Economy". University of St. Thomas (Minnesota).
- Gordon, Aaron (September 19, 2019). "The Legal Argument That Could Destroy Uber Is About To Be Tested". Gawker Media.
- Said, Carolyn (February 27, 2018). "Uber does not have enough wheelchair-accessible vehicles, new lawsuit says". San Francisco Chronicle.
- "Steele v. Uber Technologies Inc. (3:18-cv-01715)".
- "Complaint: Woman, who is blind, often denied Uber and Lyft rides because of service dog". KARE (TV). September 23, 2019.
- Sonnemaker, Tyler (April 2, 2021). "Uber ordered to pay $1.1 million to blind passenger who was denied rides 14 separate times". Business Insider.
- Jorge Mejia; Chris Parker (January 2021). "When Transparency Fails: Bias and Financial Incentives in Ridesharing Platforms". Management Science. 67 (1). doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3525.