Reorganization plan of United States Army
The reorganization plan of the United States Army is a current modernization and reorganization plan of the United States Army that was implemented under the direction of Brigade Modernization Command. This effort formally began in 2006 when General Peter Schoomaker (the Army Chief of Staff at the time), was given the support to move the Army from its Cold War divisional orientation to a full-spectrum capability with fully manned, equipped and trained brigades; this effort was completed by the end of 2016. It has been the most comprehensive reorganization since World War II and included modular combat brigades, support brigades, and command headquarters, as well as rebalancing the active and reserve components. The plan was first proposed by Army Chief of Staff, Eric Shinseki, in 1999, but was bitterly opposed internally by the Army.
In the summer of 2018, the U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC), a new Army command for modernization was activated. The modernization effort, coordinated with FORSCOM, Army Materiel Command, and TRADOC, addresses the long lead times for introducing new materiel and capabilities into the brigades of the Army.
- Build readiness by 2022
- Modernization in the midterm around 2022
- Reform by 2020
- Strengthen alliances and partnerships;  in 2019 the efforts were augmented, in the Army Posture statement:
- People & values 
- 1 Origin and initial design
- 2 Planning process, evolution, and transformation
- 3 Reorganization plans by unit type
- 4 Training and readiness
- 5 Deployment scheme
- 6 Force size and unit organization
- 7 See also
- 8 Notes
- 9 References
- 10 External links
Origin and initial designEdit
Before General Schoomaker's tenure, the Army was organized around large, mostly mechanized divisions, of around 15,000 soldiers each, with the aim of being able to fight two major theatres simultaneously. Under the new plan, the Army would be organized around modular brigades of 3,000–4,000 soldiers each, with the aim of being able to deploy continuously in different parts of the world, and effectively organizing the Army closer to the way it fights. An additional 30,000 soldiers were recruited as a short-term measure to assist in the structural changes, although a permanent end-strength change was not expected because of fears of future funding cuts, forcing the Army to pay for the additional personnel from procurement and readiness accounts. Up to 60% of the defense budget is spent on personnel and an extra 10,000 soldiers would cost US$1.4 billion annually.
On November 22 and 23, 2002, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs held the "Belfer Center Conference on Military Transformation". It brought together present and former defense officials and military commanders for the stated purpose of assessing the Department of Defense's progress in achieving a "transformation" of U.S. military capabilities. The conference was held at the Belfer Center at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government. The United States Army War College and the Dwight D. Eisenhower National Security Series were co-sponsors. In some respects this could be said to have been the birthplace of Transformation as a formal paradigm.
In 2004, the United States Army Forces Command (FORSCOM), which commands most active Army and Army Reserve forces based in the Continental United States, was tasked with supervising the modular transformation of its subordinate structure.
In March 2004, a contract was awarded to Anteon Corporation (now part of General Dynamics) to provide Modularity Coordination Cells (MCC) to each transforming corps, division and brigade within FORSCOM. Each MCC contained a team of functional area specialists who provided direct, ground-level support to the unit. The MCCs were coordinated by the Anteon office in Atlanta, Georgia.
In 2007 a new deployment scheme known as Grow the Army was adopted that enabled the Army to carry out continuous operations. The plan was modified several times including an expansion of troop numbers in 2007 and changes to the number of modular brigades. On 25 June 2013, plans were announced to disband 13 modular brigade combat teams (BCTs) and expand the remaining brigades with an extra maneuver battalion, extra fires batteries, and an engineer battalion.
History of ARFORGENEdit
The Secretary of the Army approved implementing ARFORGEN, a transformational force generation model, in 2006. ARFORGEN process diagram 2010 Army Posture Statement, Addendum F, Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN)
ARFORGEN model concept development began in the summer of 2004 and received its final approval from the Army’s senior leadership in early 2006.
FORSCOM, Department of the Army AR 525-29 Military Operations, Army Force Generation, 14 Mar 2011[dead link]
In 2016 the Army force generation process ARFORGEN was sidelined because it relied mostly on the Active Army, in favor of the total force policy, which includes the Reserve and National Guard; in the new model, the total force could have fallen to 980,000 by 2018, subject to DoD's Defense Strategic Guidance to the Joint Staff.:note especially pp.1–3 By 15 June 2017, the Department of the Army approved an increase in the Active Army's end-strength from 475,000 to 476,000. The total Army end-strength increases to 1.018 million.
Planning process, evolution, and transformationEdit
The commander-in-chief directs the planning process, through guidance to the Army by the Secretary of Defense. Every year, Army Posture Statements by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army summarize their assessment[ReadyArmy 1]:minute 1:15:00/1:22:58 of the Army's ability to respond to world events, and also to transform for the future. In support of transformation for the future, TRADOC, upon the advice of the Army's stakeholders, has assembled 20 warfighting challenges. These challenges are under evaluation during annual Army warfighting assessments, such as AWA 17.1, held in October 2016. AWA 17.1 is an assessment by 5,000 US Soldiers, Special Operations Forces, Airmen, and Marines, as well as by British, Australian, Canadian, Danish, and Italian troops. For example, "reach-back" is among the capabilities being assessed; when under attack in an unexpected location, a Soldier on the move might use WIN-T. At the halt, a light Transportable Tactical Command Communications (T2C2 Lite) system:p.356     could reach back to a mobile command post, to communicate the unexpected situation to higher echelons, a building block in multi-domain operations.
Implementation and current statusEdit
Grow the Army was a transformation and re-stationing initiative of the United States Army which began in 2007 and was scheduled to be completed by fiscal year 2013. The initiative was designed to grow the army by almost 75,000 soldiers, while realigning a large portion of the force in Europe to the continental United States in compliance with the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure suggestions. This grew the force from 42 Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs) and 75 modular support brigades in 2007 to 45 Brigade Combat Teams and 83 modular support brigades by 2013.
On 25 June 2013, US Army Chief of Staff General Raymond T. Odierno announced plans to disband 13 brigade combat teams and reduce troop strengths by 80,000 soldiers. While the number of BCTs will be reduced, the size of remaining BCTs will increase, on average, to about 4,500 soldiers. That will be accomplished, in many cases, by moving existing battalions and other assets from existing BCTs into other brigades. Two brigade combat teams in Germany had already been deactivated and a further 10 brigade combat teams slated for deactivation were announced by General Odierno on 25 June. (An additional brigade combat team was announced for deactivation 6 November 2014.) At the same time the maneuver battalions from the disbanded brigades will be used to augment armored and infantry brigade combat teams with a third maneuver battalion and expanded brigades fires capabilities by adding a third battery to the existing fires battalions. Furthermore, all brigade combat teams—armored, infantry and Stryker—will gain a Brigade Engineer Battalion, with "gap-crossing" and route-clearance capability.
On 6 November 2014, it was reported that the 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, currently stationed in South Korea, was to be deactivated in June 2015 and be replaced by a succession of U.S.-based brigade combat teams, which are to be rotated in and out, at the same nine-month tempo as practiced by the Army from 2001–2014.
Eleven brigades were inactivated by 2015. The remaining brigades as of 2015 are listed below. On 16 March 2016, the Deputy Commanding General (DCG) of FORSCOM announced that the brigades would now also train to move their equipment to their new surge location as well as to train for the requirements of their next deployment.
By 2018, Secretary of the Army Mark Esper noted that even though the large deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan had ceased, at any given time, three of the Armored Brigade Combat Teams are deployed to EUCOM, CENTCOM, and INDOPACOM, respectively, while two Infantry Brigade Combat Teams are deployed to Iraq, and Afghanistan, respectively.
[At any given time,] there are more than 100,000 Soldiers deployed around the world —Secretary of the Army Mark Esper
In 2019 the Secretary of the Army asserted that the planning efforts, including Futures Command, the SFABs, and the Decisive Action readiness training of the BCTs are preparing the Army for competition with both near-peer and regional powers. 
The Budget Control Act could potentially restrict funds by 2020.  By the 2024-2025 time frame, the fiscal year development plan (FYDP) will have reallocated $10 billion more into development of the top 6 modernization priorities, taking those funds from legacy spending budgets.
Reorganization plans by unit typeEdit
The Army has now been organized around modular brigades of 3,000–4,000 soldiers each, with the aim of being able to deploy continuously in different parts of the world, and effectively organizing the Army closer to the way it fights. The fact that this modernization is now in place has been acknowledged by the renaming of the 'Brigade Modernization Command' to the "U.S. Army Joint Modernization Command," on 16 February 2017.
Modular combat brigadesEdit
Modular combat brigades are self-contained combined arms formations. They are standardized formations across the active and reserve components, meaning an Armored BCT at Fort Hood is the same as one at Fort Stewart.[Note 1]
Reconnaissance plays a large role in the new organizational designs. The Army felt the acquisition of the target was the weak link in the chain of finding, fixing, closing with, and destroying the enemy. The Army felt that it had already sufficient lethal platforms to take out the enemy and thus the number of reconnaissance units in each brigade was increased.[Note 2] The brigades sometimes depend on joint fires from the Air Force and Navy to accomplish their mission. As a result, the amount of field artillery has been reduced in the brigade design.
The three types of BCTs are Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs), Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs) (includes Light, Air Assault and Airborne units), and Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs).
Armored Brigade Combat Teams, or ABCTs consist of 4,743 troops. This includes the third maneuver battalion as laid out in 2013. The changes announced by the U.S. army on 25 June 2013, include adding a third maneuver battalion to the brigade, a second engineer company to a new Brigade Engineer Battalion, a third battery to the FA battalion, and reducing the size of each battery from 8 to 6 guns. These changes will also increase the number of troops in the affected battalions and also increase the total troops in the brigade. Since the brigade has more organic units, the command structure includes a deputy commander (in addition to the traditional executive officer) and a larger staff capable of working with civil affairs, special operations, psychological operations, air defense, and aviation units. An Armored BCT consists of:
- the brigade headquarters and headquarters company (HHC): 43 officers, 17 warrant officers, 125 enlisted personnel – total: 185 soldiers. The commander and deputy commander each have a personal M2A3 Infantry Fighting Vehicle.[Note 3]
- the Brigade Engineer Battalion (BEB) (formerly Brigade Special Troops Battalion (BSTB)), consisted of a headquarters company, signal company, military intelligence company with a TUAV platoon and two combat engineer companies (A and B company). The former BSTB fielded 28 officers, 6 warrant officers, 470 enlisted personnel – total: 504 soldiers. Each of the combat engineer company fields 13× M2A2 ODS-E, 1× M113A3, 3× M1150 ABV, 1× M9 ACE, and 2× M104 AVLB.
- a Cavalry (formerly Armed Reconnaissance) Squadron, consisting of a headquarters troop (HHT) and three reconnaissance troops and one armored troop. The HHT fields 2× M3A3 cavalry fighting vehicles and 3× M7A3 fire support vehicles armed with TOW anti-tank guided missiles, while each reconnaissance troop fields 7× M3A3 cavalry fighting vehicles. The squadron fields 35 officers and 385 enlisted personnel – total: 424 soldiers.
- three identical combined arms battalions, flagged as a battalion of an infantry, armored or cavalry regiment. Each battalion consists of a headquarters and headquarters company, two tank companies and two mechanized infantry companies. The battalions field 48 officers and 580 enlisted personnel each – total: 628 soldiers. The HHC fields 1× M1A2 main battle tank, 1× M2A3 infantry fighting vehicle, 3× M3A3 cavalry fighting vehicles, 4× M7A3 fire support vehicles and 4× M1064 mortar carriers with M120 120 mm mortars. Each of the two tank companies fields 14× M1A2 main battle tanks, while each mechanized infantry company fields 14× M2A3 infantry fighting vehicles. In 2016, the ABCT's combined arms battalions adopted a triangle structure, of two armored battalions (of two armored companies plus a single mechanized infantry company) plus a mechanized infantry battalion (of two mechanized companies and one armored company). This resulted in the reduction of two mechanized infantry companies; the deleted armored company was reflagged as a troop to the Cavalry Squadron.
- a Field Artillery battalion, consisting of a headquarters battery, two cannon batteries with 8× M109A6 self-propelled 155 mm howitzers each (the changes announced by the U.S. Army on 25 June 2013, include adding a third battery to the FA battalion, and reducing the size of each battery from 8 to 6 guns; these changes also increase the number of troops in the affected battalions and also increase the total troops in the Brigade), and a target acquisition platoon. 24 officers, 2 warrant officers, 296 enlisted personnel – total: 322 soldiers.
- a brigade support battalion (BSB), consisting of a headquarters, medical, distribution and maintenance company, plus six forward support companies, each of which support one of the three combined arms battalions, the cavalry squadron, the engineer battalion and the field artillery battalion. 61 officers, 14 warrant officers, 1,019 enlisted personnel – total: 1,094 soldiers.
Infantry Brigade Combat Team, or IBCTs, comprised around 3,300 soldiers, in the pre-2013 design, which did not include the 3rd maneuver battalion. The 2013 end-strength is now 4,413 Soldiers:
- Special Troops Battalion (now Brigade Engineer Battalion)
- Cavalry Squadron
- (2), later (3) Infantry Battalions
- Field Artillery Battalion
- Brigade Support Battalion
Stryker Brigade Combat Team or SBCTs comprised about 3,900 soldiers, making it the largest of the three combat brigade constructs in the 2006 design, and over 4,500 Soldiers in the 2013 reform. Its design includes:
- Headquarters Company
- Cavalry Squadron (with three 14-vehicle, two-120 mm mortar reconnaissance troops plus a surveillance troop with UAVs and NBC detection capability)
- (3) Stryker infantry battalions (each with three rifle companies with 12 infantry-carrying vehicles, 3 mobile gun platforms, 2 120 mm mortars, and around 100 infantry dismounts each, plus an HHC with scout, mortar and medical platoons and a sniper section.)
- Engineer Company (folded into the Brigade Engineer Battalion) [An additional engineer company was added to the battalion in the 2013 reform]
- Signal Company (folded into the Brigade Engineer Battalion)
- Military Intelligence Company (with UAV platoon) (folded into the Brigade Engineer Battalion)
- Anti-tank company (9 TOW-equipped Stryker vehicles) (folded into the Brigade Engineer Battalion)
- Field Artillery Battalion (three 6-gun 155 mm Howitzer batteries, target acquisition platoon, and a joint fires cell)
- Brigade Support Battalion (headquarters, medical, maintenance, and distribution companies)
Modular support brigadesEdit
Similar modularity will exist for support units which fall into five types: Aviation, Fires (artillery), Battlefield Surveillance (intelligence), Maneuver Enhancement (engineers, signal, military police, chemical, and rear-area support), and Sustainment (logistics, medical, transportation, maintenance, etc.). In the past, artillery, combat support, and logistics support only resided at the division level and brigades were assigned those units only on a temporary basis when brigades transformed into "brigade combat teams" for particular deployments.
Combat Aviation Brigades are multi-functional, offering a combination of attack helicopters (i.e., Apache), reconnaissance helicopters (i.e., Kiowa), medium-lift helicopters (i.e., Blackhawks), heavy-lift helicopters (i.e., Chinooks), and medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) capability. Aviation will not be organic to combat brigades. It will continue to reside at the division-level due to resource constraints.
Heavy divisions (of which there are six) will have 48 Apaches, 38 Blackhawks, 12 Chinooks, and 12 Medevac helicopters in their aviation brigade. These are divided into two aviation attack battalions, an assault lift battalion, a general aviation support battalion. An aviation support battalion will have headquarters, refuelling/resupply, repair/maintenance, and communications companies. Light divisions will have aviation brigades with 60 armed reconnaissance helicopters and no Apaches, with the remaining structure the same. The remaining divisions will have aviation brigades with 30 armed reconnaissance helicopters and 24 Apaches, with the remaining structure the same. Ten Army Apache helicopter units will convert to heavy attack reconnaissance squadrons, with 12 RQ-7B Shadow drones apiece. The helicopters to fill out these large, combined-arms division-level aviation brigades comes from aviation units that used to reside at the corps-level.
Fires Brigades (renamed Field Artillery Brigades in 2014) provide traditional artillery fires (Paladin, Howitzer, MLRS, HIMARS) as well as information operations and non-lethal effects capabilities. After the 2013 reform, the expertise formerly embodied in the pre-2007 Division Artillery (DIVARTY) was formally re-instituted in the Division Artillery Brigades of 2015. The operational Fires battalions will now report to this new formulation of DIVARTY, for training and operational Fires standards, as well as to the BCT.
Air Defense: The Army will no longer provide an organic air defense artillery (ADA) battalion to its divisions. Nine of the ten active component (AC) divisional ADA battalions and two of the eight reserve (ARNG) divisional ADA battalions will deactivate. The remaining AC divisional ADA battalion along with six ARNG divisional ADA battalions will be pooled at the Unit of Employment to provide on-call air and missile defense (AMD) protection. The pool of Army AMD resources will address operational requirements in a tailorable and timely manner without stripping assigned AMD capability from other missions. Maneuver short-range air defense (MSHORAD) with laser cannon prototypes are fielding by 2020.
Maneuver Enhancement Brigades are designed to be self-contained, and will command units such as chemical, military police, civil affairs units, and tactical units such as a maneuver infantry battalion. These formations are designed to be joint so that they can operate with coalition, or joint forces such as the Marine Corps, or can span the gap between modular combat brigades and other modular support brigades.[Note 4]
Sustainment Brigades provide echelon-above-brigade-level logistics. On its rotation to South Korea, 3rd ABCT, 1st Armored Division deployed its supply support activity (SSA) common authorized stockage list (CASL) as well. The CASL allows the ABCT to draw additional stocks beyond its pipeline of materiel from GCSS-A. The DoD-level Global Combat Support System includes an Army-level tool (GCSS-A), which runs on tablet computers with bar code readers which 92-A specialists use to enter and track materiel requests, as the materiel makes its way through the supply chain to the brigades. This additional information can then be used by GCSS-A to trigger resupply for Army pre-positioned stocks, typically by sea.
The former Battlefield Surveillance Brigades, now denoted Military Intelligence Brigades (Expeditionary), will offer additional UAVs and long-term surveillance detachments. Each of the three active duty brigades is attached to an Army Corps.
Security Force Assistance BrigadesEdit
Security Force Assistance Brigades (SFABs) are brigades whose mission is to train, advise, and assist (TAA) the armed forces of other coalition partners. The SFAB are neither bound by conventional decisive operations nor counter-insurgency operations. Operationally, a 500-soldier SFAB would free-up a 4500-soldier BCT from a TAA mission. On 23 June 2016 General Mark Milley revealed plans for train/advise/assist Brigades, consisting of seasoned officers and NCOs with a full chain of command,:Minute 18:40/1:00:45 but no junior Soldiers. In the event of a national emergency the end-strengths of the SFABs could be augmented with new soldiers from basic training and advanced individual training.
An SFAB was projected to consist of 500 senior officers and NCOs, which, the Army says, could act as a cadre to reform a full BCT in a matter of months. In May 2017, the initial SFAB staffing of 529 soldiers was underway, including 360 officers. The officers will have had previous command experience.:21:20 Commanders and leaders will have previously led BCTs at the same echelon. The remaining personnel, all senior NCOs, are to be recruited from across the Army. Promotable E-4s who volunteer for the SFAB are automatically promoted to Sergeant upon completion of the Military Advisor Training Academy. A team of twelve soldiers would include a medic, personnel for intelligence support, and air support, as cited by Keller. 
These SFABs would be trained in languages, how to work with interpreters, and equipped with the latest equipment such as Integrated Tactical Network (ITN) using T2C2 systems including secure, but unclassified, communications and weapons to support coalition partners, as well as unmanned aircraft systems (UASs). The first five SFABs would align with the Combatant Commands (CENTCOM, USINDOPACOM, AFRICOM, ...) as required; an SFAB could provide up to 58 teams (possibly with additional Soldiers for force protection).
Funding for the first two SFABs was secured in June 2017. By October 2017, the first of six planned SFABs (the 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade) was established at Fort Benning.:minute 50:00 On 16 October 2017, BG Brian Mennes of Force Management in the Army's G3/5/7 announced accelerated deployment of the first two SFABs, possibly by Spring 2018 to Afghanistan and Iraq, if required. This was approved in early July 2017, by the Secretary of Defense and the Chief of Staff of the Army. On 8 February 2018, 1st SFAB held an activation ceremony at Fort Benning, revealing its colors and heraldry for the first time, and then cased its colors for the deployment to Afghanistan. 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade deployed to Afghanistan in Spring 2018.
On 8 December 2017, the Army announced the activation of the second Security Force Assistance Brigade, for January 2018, the second of six planned SFABs. The SFAB are to consist of about 800 senior and noncommissioned officers who have served at the same echelon, with proven expertise in advise-and-assist operations with foreign security forces. Fort Bragg was chosen as the station for the second SFAB in anticipation of the time projected to train a Security Force Assistance Brigade. On 17 January 2018 Chief of Staff Mark Milley announced the activation of the third SFAB. 2nd SFAB undergoes three months of training beginning October 2018, to be followed by a Joint Readiness Training Center Rotation beginning January 2019, and deployment in spring 2019. The 3rd, 4th, and 5th SFABs are to be stationed at Fort Hood, Fort Carson, and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, respectively; the headquarters station for the National Guard SFAB (54th SFAB) will be in Indiana, one of six states to contribute an element of 54th SFAB. It is likely that these brigades will be seeing service in the CENTCOM Area of Responsibility (AOR).
The Security Force Assistance Command (SFAC), a one-star division-level command and all six SFABs will be activated by 2020. The Security Force Assistance Directorate, a one-star Directorate for the SFABs, will be part of FORSCOM in Fort Bragg. SFAD will be responsible for the Military Advisor Training Academy as well. The 1st SFAB commander was promoted to Brigadier General in Gardez, Afghanistan on 18 August 2018. The 2nd SFAB commander was promoted to Brigadier General 7 September 2018. SFAC and 2nd SFAB were activated in a joint ceremony at Fort Bragg on 3 December 2018. 2nd SFAB deployed to Afghanistan in February 2019. 3rd SFAB activated at Fort Hood on 16 July 2019; 3rd SFAB will relieve 2nd SFAB in Afghanistan for the Winter 2019 rotation.
Security Assistance is part of The Army Strategy 2018's Line of Effort 4: "Strengthen Alliances and Partnerships". The Security Assistance Command is based at Redstone Arsenal (but the SFAC is based at Fort Bragg).
Army Field Support BrigadesEdit
Army Field Support Brigades (AFSBs) have been utilized to field materiel in multiple Combatant Command's Areas of Responsibility (AORs). Initially 405th AFSB prepositioned stocks for a partial brigade; eventually, the 405th was to field materiel for an ABCT, a Division headquarters, a Fires Brigade, and a Sustainment Brigade in their AOR, which required multinational agreements. Similarly, 401st AFSB configured materiel for an ABCT in their AOR as well. The objective has been combat configuration: maintain their vehicles to support a 96-hour readiness window for a deployed ABCT on demand. In addition, 403rd Army Field Support Brigade maintains prepositioned stocks for their AOR.
Below the Combatant Commands echelon, Division commands will command and control their combat and support brigades. Divisions will operate as plug-and-play headquarters commands (similar to corps) instead of fixed formations with permanently assigned units. Any combination of brigades may be allocated to a division command for a particular mission, up to a maximum of four combat brigades. For instance, the 3rd Infantry Division headquarters could be assigned two armor brigades and two infantry brigades based on the expected requirements of a given mission. On its next deployment, the same division may have one Stryker brigade and two armor brigades assigned to it. The same modus operandi holds true for support units. The goal of reorganization with regard to logistics is to streamline the logistics command structure so that combat service support can fulfill its support mission more efficiently.
The division headquarters itself has also been redesigned as a modular unit that can be assigned an array of units and serve in many different operational environments. The new term for this headquarters is the UEx (or Unit of Employment, X). The headquarters is designed to be able to operate as part of a joint force, command joint forces with augmentation, and command at the operational level of warfare (not just the tactical level). It will include organic security personnel and signal capability plus liaison elements. As of March 2015, nine of the ten regular Army division headquarters, and two national guard division headquarters are committed in support of Combatant Commands.:Executive Summary 
When not deployed, the division will have responsibility for the training and readiness of a certain number of modular brigades units. For instance, the 3rd Infantry Division headquarters module based at Fort Stewart, GA is responsible for the readiness of its combat brigades and other units of the division, assuming they have not been deployed separately under a different division.
The re-designed headquarters module comprises around 1,000 soldiers including over 200 officers. It includes:
- A Main Command Post where mission planning and analysis are conducted
- A mobile command group for commanding while on the move
- (2) Tactical Command Posts to exercise control of brigades
- Liaison elements
- A special troops battalion with a security company and signal company
Divisions will continue to be commanded by major generals, unless coalition requirements require otherwise. Regional army commands (e.g. 3rd Army, 7th Army, 8th Army) will remain in use in the future but with changes to the organization of their headquarters designed to make the commands more integrated and relevant in the structure of the reorganized Army, as the chain of command for a deployed division headquarters now runs directly to an Army service component command (ASCC), or to FORSCOM.
In January 2017, examples of pared-down tactical operations centers, suitable for brigades and divisions, were demonstrated at a command post huddle at Fort Bliss. The huddle of the commanders of FORSCOM, United States Army Reserve Command, First Army, I and III Corps, 9 of the Active Army divisions, and other formations discussed standardized solutions for streamlining command posts. The Army is paring-down the tactical operations centers, and making them more agile, to increase their survivability. By July 2019 battalion command posts have demonstrated jump times of just over 3 hours, at the combat training centers, repeated 90 to 120 times in a rotation.
Four major commandsEdit
United States Army Futures Command (AFC), "a small agile command" (growing from 12 people at headquarters as of 2018 to 24,000 in 25 states and 15 countries in 2019) is slated to be the Army's fourth Army command (ACOM). AFC joined the other Army commands FORSCOM, Army Materiel Command (AMC), and TRADOC as four-star commands. Austin, Texas is the station for the headquarters of Futures Command. Initial operating capability is slated for 2018. Although the Army has enjoyed overmatch for the past seventy years, more rapid modernization for conflict with near-peers is the reason for AFC, which will be focused on achieving clear overmatch in six areas — long-range precision fires, next-generation combat vehicle, future vertical lift platforms, a mobile & expeditionary Army network, air & missile defense capabilities, and soldier lethality (i.e. artillery, armor, aviation, signal, air defense artillery, and infantry respectively see: Futures).
In a reform-oriented break with Army custom, leaders of AFC headquarters will locate in a downtown property of the University of Texas System, while project-driven soldiers and Army civilians will co-locate with entrepreneurs/innovators in tech hubs, in the vision of Under Secretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy. The official activation ceremony of AFC was on 24 August 2018, in Austin, Texas; in a press conference on that day featuring Army Chief of Staff Milley, Secretary Esper, Mayor Adler, and AFC commander Murray, Chief Milley noted that AFC would actively reach out into the community in order to learn, and that Senator John McCain's frank criticism of the acquisition process was instrumental for modernization reform at Futures command.:minute 7:30 In fact, AFC soldiers would blend into Austin by not wearing their uniforms [to work side-by-side with civilians in the tech hubs], Milley noted in the 24 August 2018 press conference.:minute 6:20 Secretary Esper said he expected failures during the process of learning how to reform the acquisition and modernization process.:minute 18:20
The organizational design of AFC was informed by the cancellation of the Army's Future Combat Systems project. Under Secretary of the Army Ryan D. McCarthy reviewed the reasons for that cancellation.: Minute 19:40 Thus "unity of command and purpose": Minutes 12:22, 23:01 was a criterion for the design by unifying previous modernization efforts in a single command; the sub-goals would be met in do-able chunks. The ratio of uniformed personnel to Army civilian employees is expected to be a talent-based, task-based issue for the AFC commander.: Minute 32:40The expectation is that these reforms will enable cultural change across the entire Army, as a part of attaining full operational capability.: Minute 27:14 The Program Executive Offices (PEOs) of ASA (ALT) will have a dotted-line relationship with Futures Command.
In order to separate Army modernization from today's requirement for readiness, eight cross-functional teams (CFTs)[Note 5] were transferred from the other three major commands to Futures Command. United States Army Research, Development and Engineering Command and the United States Army Capabilities Integration Center will report to the new command. ATEC retains its direct reporting relationship to the Chief of Staff of the Army.
The first tranche of transfers into AFC included: Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC), Capability Development and Integration Directorates (CDIDs), and TRADOC Analysis Center (TRAC) from TRADOC, and RDECOM (including the six research, development and engineering centers (RDECs), and the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL)), and Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity (AMSAA), from AMC, as announced by Secretary Esper on 4 June 2018. TRADOC's new role is amended accordingly. The Principal Military Deputy to the ASA(ALT) is also deputy commanding general for Combat Systems, Army Futures Command, and leads the PEOs; he has directed each PEO who does not have a CFT to coordinate with, to immediately form one, at least informally. General Murray has announced that AFC intends to be a global command, in its search for disruptive technologies. Army Chief of Staff Milley is looking for AFC to attain full operational capability (FOC) by August 2019.
As this modernized materiel is fielded to the brigades, the scheme is to equip the units with the highest levels of readiness for deployment with upgraded equipment earliest, while continuing to train the remaining units to attain their full mission capability. Note that expertise, in say psychological operations, is not necessarily confined to the Active Army brigades; if some operation were to require the expertise of a National Guard unit for example, an echelon above brigade might require that a unit with the most modern materiel be formed, to utilize that expertise.
Multi-domain operations (MDO)Edit
In 2017, the concept of multi-domain battle (MDB) had emerged from TRADOC, for which the Army sought joint approval from the other services; instead, the Air Force recommended multi-domain operations (MDO) as the operating concept.
Multi-domain operations cover integrated operation of cyberspace, space (meaning satellite operations, from the Army's perspective), land, maritime, and air. A multi-domain task force was stood up in 2018 in I Corps for the Pacific. Multi-domain battalions, first stood up in 2019, comprise a single unit for air, land, space, and cyber domains. New cyber authorities have been granted under National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) 13; persistent cyber engagements at Cyber command are the new norm for cyber operations. The CG of Futures Command (AFC) has noted that MDO will tie together the initiatives of AFC; but failures are to be expected in the AFC initiatives, and the institutional response of the Army, which is traditionally risk-averse, will test how committed the nation is to Army reforms. Army Futures Command (AFC) has initiated planning for Multi-domain operations (MDO) which will extend beyond the Active component (the Regular Army) to include the Reserve component: Army Reserve or National Guard (ARNG) units. AFC's Futures and Concepts DCG, Lt. General Eric Wesley, is clear that troops from both Active and Reserve components will be interoperating, and that no troops will be lost from the Reserve (ARNG) component, but that there would be flow between Active and Reserve components. The subject is still fluid, including the relation between the services; the Army, Marines, and Air Force, at least are 'on the same page'. Mesh networking is in play for the Mobile, Expeditionary Network: In Fiscal Year 2019, the network CFT, PEO 3CT, and PEO Soldier leveraged Network Integration Evaluation 18.2 for experiments with brigade level scalability. Among the takeaways was to avoid overspecifying the requirements (in ITN Information Systems Initial Capabilities Document) to meet operational needs, such as interoperability with other networks.:minute 26:40 Up through 2028, every two years the Army will insert new capability sets for ITN (Capability sets '21, '23, '25, etc.).
TRADOC has designed exercises for JWA 19, at Fort Lewis, to clarify the jumps for Command Posts, to ensure their survivability during future operations. In 2019, there is a new focus on planning for large-scale ground combat operations (LSCO), "that will require echelons above brigade, all of which will solve unique and distinct problems that a given BCT can't solve by itself."—LTG Eric Wesley. Computer simulations (DOTMLPF), of the survivability rates for the units, were then compared with the interaction strategies, tactics and operations of JWA 19, a highly contested environment. JWA 19 occurred at multiple operational speeds, in multiple domains served by multiple services (cyber: operating in milliseconds; air: operations at 500 miles per hour; maritime: 30 knots; and ground: 2 miles per hour). JWA 19 involved the militaries of the US, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, France, Australia and Singapore. In 2019 Secretary of Defense Mark Esper identified the Indo-Pacific Theater as the priority theater for the United States. 
JWA 20 will exercise Multi-domain operations, and multinational forces, in EUCOM for 2020. See: Vostok 2018. EUCOM's Multi-domain task force will be smaller than the Pacific's task force. It is expected that the task forces will be employed in the Defender 2020 exercises in both EUCOM and the Pacific. 
In September and November 2019 the Department of Defense (DoD) has “scheduled a series of globally integrated exercises with participation from across the US government interagency to refine our plans” — Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford. This exercise is designed to help Secretary of Defense Mark Esper develop new plans, in the face of a change in chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Specifically what is missing is a joint concept shared at the appropriate operational speed between the several domains, among the respective services, when fighting a peer adversary.—LTG Eric Wesley
Alliances and partnershipsEdit
An ongoing series of programs to strengthen relationships between the Army and its allies and partners is in implementation. These programs include demonstrations of cooperation, interoperability, and preparedness of its partners. For example, in 2019 the Army uses DoD's State Partnership Program, to link 22 National Guard Bilateral Affairs Officers (BAOs) with 22 allies or partners in the 54 countries in EUCOM's area of responsibility (AoR) to facilitate their common defense interests with the US. In all, 76 partnerships are extant. See: Foreign Area Officer (FAO)
In April 2019 Germany's 1st Armored Division (1AD) took the lead of a High command exercise (HICON) at Hohenfels Training Area, primarily for German 21st Armored Brigade, the Lithuanian Iron Wolf Brigade, and their subordinate units; 5,630 participants from 15 nations took part in this Joint multinational exercise, which rotates the lead among the coalition partners. Germany's 1AD already has Dutch, British and Polish officers within its ranks. A US Army Armored battalion, 34th Armored Regiment, took part in the exercise. Six engineering advisor teams from 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade (SFAB) provided hands-on experience and testing of secure communications between NATO allies and partners.
A reciprocal exchange of general officers between France and the US is taking place in 2019, under the U.S. Army Military Personnel Exchange Program (MPEP). Such programs with the UK, Australia, and Canada have already existed with the US.
Training and readinessEdit
Under Schoomaker, combat training centers (CTCs) emphasized the contemporary operating environment (such as an urban, ethnically-sensitive city in Iraq) and stress units according to the unit mission and the commanders' assessments, collaborating often to support holistic collective training programs, rather than by exception as was formerly the case.
Schoomaker's plan was to resource units based on the mission they are expected to accomplish (major combat versus SASO, or stability and support operations), regardless of component (active or reserve). Instead of using snapshot readiness reports, the Army now rates units based on the mission they are expected to perform given their position across the three force pools ('reset', 'train/ready', and 'available'). The Army now deploys units upon each commanders' signature on the certificate of their unit's assessment (viz., Ready). As of June 2016, only one-third of the Army's brigades were ready to deploy. By 2019, two-thirds of the Active Army's brigades are now at the highest levels of readiness.
- "Soldiers need to be ready[ReadyArmy 2] 100 percent of the time."—Robert B. Abrams, FORSCOM commander, June 2, 2016
Chief of Staff Mark Milley's readiness objective is that all operational units be at 90 percent of the authorized strength in 2018, at 100 percent by 2021, and at 105 percent by 2023. The observer coach/trainers at the combat training centers, recruiters, and drill sergeants are be filled at 100 percent strength by the end of 2018. In November 2018, written deployability standards (Army Directive 2018-22) were set by the Secretary and the Chief of Staff of the Army; failure to meet the standard means a soldier has six months to remedy this, or face separation from the Army. The directive does not apply to about 60,000 of the 1,016,000 Soldiers of the Army; 70-80 percent of the 60,000 are non-deployable for medical reasons. Non-deployables have declined from 121,000 in 2017. The Army combat fitness test (ACFT) will test all soldiers; at the minimum, the 3-Repetition Maximum Deadlift, the Sprint-Drag-Carry and an aerobic event will be required of all soldiers, including those with profiles (meaning there is an annotation in their record); the assessment of the alternative aerobic test will be completed by 19 October 2019.
Soldier and Family Readiness GroupsEdit
Soldiers and Army spouses belong to Soldier and Family Readiness Groups (SFRGs), renamed from (FRGs) which mirror the command structure of an Army unit — the spouse of the 40th Chief of Staff of the United States Army has served on the FRG at every echelon of the Army. :Ryan McCarthy, minute 39:33 The name change to SFRG is to be more inclusive of single soldiers, single parents, and also those with nontraditional families. An S/FRG seeks to meet the needs of soldiers and their families, for example during a deployment, or to address privatized housing deficiencies, or to aid spouses find jobs. As a soldier transfers in and out of an installation, the soldier's entire family will typically undergo a permanent change of station (PCS) to the next post. PCS to Europe and Japan is now uniformly for 36 months, regardless of family status (formerly 36 months for families). Transfers typically follow the cycle of the school year to minimize disruption in an Army family. When a family emergency occurs, the informal support of that unit's FRG is available to the soldier. (But the Army Emergency Relief fund is available to any soldier with a phone call to their local garrison.) The name change links Soldier Readiness with Family Readiness. Commanders will retain full responsibility for Soldier sponsorship after a move, especially for first term Soldiers in that move.
In response to Army tenant problems with privatized base housing, IMCOM was subordinated to Army Materiel Command on 8 March 2019.  In 2019 the Army issued several directives to make it easier for families to make money even while living in on-base housing.
"Associated units" training programEdit
The Army announced a pilot program, 'associated units', in which a National Guard or Reserve unit would now train with a specific active Army formation. These units would wear the patch of the specific Army division before their deployment to a theater; 36th Infantry Division (United States) headquarters deployed to Afghanistan in May 2016 for a train, advise, assist mission.
The Army Reserve, whose headquarters are colocated with FORSCOM, and the National Guard, are testing the associated units program in a three-year pilot program with the active Army. The program will use the First Army training roles at the Army Combat Training Centers at Fort Irwin, Fort Polk, and regional and overseas training facilities.
The pilot program complements FORSCOM's total force partnerships with the National Guard, begun in 2014. Summer 2016 will see the first of these units.
- Associated units 
- 3rd Infantry BCT, 10th Mountain Division, stationed at Fort Polk, Louisiana, associated with the 36th Infantry Division, Texas Army National Guard
- 48th Infantry BCT, Georgia ARNG, associated with the 3rd Infantry Division, Stationed at Fort Stewart, Georgia
- 86th Infantry BCT, Vermont ARNG, associated with the 10th Mountain Division, stationed at Fort Drum, New York
- 81st Armored BCT, Washington ARNG, associated with the 7th Infantry Division, stationed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
- Task Force 1-28th Infantry Battalion., 3rd Infantry Division, stationed at Fort Benning, Georgia, associated with the 48th Infantry BCT, Georgia Army National Guard
- 100th Battalion., 442nd Infantry Regiment, USAR, associated with the 3rd Infantry BCT, 25th Infantry Division, stationed at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii
- 1st Battalion., 143rd Infantry Regiment Texas ARNG, associated with the 173rd Airborne BCT, stationed in Vicenza, Italy
- 1st Battalion., 151st Infantry Regiment, Indiana ARNG, associated with the 2nd Infantry BCT, 25th Infantry Division, stationed at Schofield Barracks
- 5th Engineer Battalion., stationed at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, associated with the 35th Engineer Brigade, Missouri ARNG
- 840th Engineer Company, Texas ARNG, associated with the 36th Engineer Brigade, stationed at Fort Hood, Texas
- 824th Quartermaster Company, USAR, associated with the 82nd Airborne Division's Sustainment Brigade, stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
- 249th Transportation Company, Texas ARNG, associated with the 1st Cavalry Division's Sustainment Brigade., stationed in Fort Hood
- 1245th Transportation Company, Oklahoma ARNG, associated with the 1st Cavalry Division's Sustainment Brigade., stationed in Fort Hood
- 1176th Transportation Company, Tennessee ARNG, associated with the 101st Airborne Division's Sustainment Brigade, stationed at Fort Campbell, Kentucky
- 2123rd Transportation Company, Kentucky ARNG, associated with the 101st Airborne Division's Sustainment Brigade, stationed at Fort Campbell
Plans are being formulated for mobilization of the Army Reserve (42,000 to 45,000 soldiers) very quickly. For example, 'Ready Force X' (RFX) teams have fielded Deployment Assistance Team Command and Control Cells to expedite the associated equipment to the various ports and vessels which is required for the specific Reserve personnel who have been notified that they are deploying.FORSCOM's mobilization and force generation installations (MFGIs) have fluctuated from two primary installations (2018) to an envisioned eleven primary and fourteen contingency MFGIs, in preparation for future actions against near-peers. See: Soldier Readiness Processing
Soldiers train for weapons handling, and marksmanship first individually, on static firing ranges, and then on simulators such as an Engagement Skills Trainer (EST). More advanced training on squad level simulators (Squad Advanced Marksmanship-Trainer (SAMT)) place a squad in virtual engagements against avatars of various types, using M4 carbine, M249 light machine gun and M9 Beretta pistol simulated weapon systems. Home stations are to receive Synthetic training environments (STEs) for mission training, as an alternative to rotations to the National Combat Training Centers, which operate Brigade-level training against an Opposing force (OPFOR) with near-peer equipment.
Some installations have urban training facilities for infantrymen, in preparation for Brigade-level training.
A 2019 marksmanship manual "TC 3-20.40, Training and Qualification-Individual Weapons" (the Dot-40) now mandates the use of the simulators, as if the Soldier were in combat. The Dot-40 is to be used by the entire Army, from the Cadets at West Point, to the Active Army, the Army Reserve, and Army National Guard; the Dot-40 tests how rapidly Soldiers can load and reload while standing, kneeling, lying prone, and firing from behind a barrier. The marksmanship tests of a Soldier's critical thinking, selecting targets to shoot at, in which order, and the accuracy of each shot are recorded by the simulators.
Up to a platoon-sized unit of a Stryker brigade combat team, and dismounted infantry, can train on Stryker simulators (Stryker Virtual Collective Trainer - SVCT), which are in the process of being installed at 8 home stations. The 4th is being completed. Forty-five infantrymen (4 Stryker shells) or thirty-six scouts (6 Stryker shells) can rehearse their battle rhythm on a virtual battlefield, record their lessons learned, give their after-action reports, and repeat, as a team. The Stryker gunner's seat comes directly from a Stryker vehicle and has a Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS) and joystick to control a virtual .50 caliber machine gun or a virtual 30 mm autocannon.
Applications for Synthetic Training Environment (STE)Edit
The Squad Advanced Marksmanship Training (SAMT) system, developed by the STE Cross-functional team from Futures Command, has an application for 1st SFAB. Bluetooth enabled replicas of M4 rifles and M9 and Glock 19 pistols, with compressed air recoil approximate the form, fit and function of the weapons that the Soldiers are using in close combat. For 1st SFAB, scenarios included virtual reality attacks which felt like engagements in a room. The scenarios can involve the entire SFAB Advisor team, and engagements can be repeated over and over again. Advanced marksmanship skills such as firing with the non-dominant hand, and firing on the move can be practiced.
Nine Army sites are now equipped with the SAMT. Over twenty systems are planned for locations in the United States.
Digital air ground integration ranges (DAGIRs)Edit
Live-fire digital air ground integration ranges (DAGIRs) were first conceptualized in the 1990s, and established in 2012, with follow-on in 2019. The ranges initially included 23 miles of tank trails, targets, battlefield effects simulators, and digital wiring for aerial scorekeeping. These ranges are designed for coordinating air and ground exercises before full-on sessions at the National Training Centers.
Training against OPFORsEdit
To serve a role as an Opposing force (OPFOR) could be a mission for an Army unit, as temporary duty (TDY), during which they might wear old battle dress uniforms, perhaps inside-out. TRADOC's Mission Command Training Program, as well as Cyber Command designs tactics for these OPFORs. When a brigade trains at Fort Irwin, Fort Polk, or Joint Multinational Training Center (in Hohenfels, Germany) the Army tasks 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, 1st Battalion, 509th Infantry Regiment (Abn), and 1st Battalion, 4th Infantry Regiment, respectively, with the OPFOR role, and provides the OPFOR with modern equipment (such as the FGM-148 Javelin) to test that brigade's readiness for deployment. Multiple integrated laser engagement systems serve as proxies for actual fired weapons, and Soldiers are lost to the commander from "kills" by laser hits.
The force generation system, posited in 2006 by General Schoomaker, projected that the U.S. Army would be deployed continuously. The Army would serve as an expeditionary force to fight a protracted campaign against terrorism and stand ready for other potential contingencies across the full-spectrum of operations (from humanitarian and stability operations to major combat operations against a conventional foe).
Under ideal circumstances, Army units would have a minimum "dwell time," a minimum duration of which it would remain at home station before deployment. Active-duty units would be prepared to deploy once every three years. Army Reserve units would be prepared to deploy once every five years. National Guard units would be prepared to deploy once every six years. A total of 71 combat brigades would form the Army's rotation basis, 42 from the active component with the balance from the reserves.
Thus, around 15 active-duty combat brigades would be available for deployment each year under the 2006 force-generation plan. An additional 4 or 5 brigades would be available for deployment from the reserve component. The plan was designed to provide more stability to soldiers and their families. Within the system, a surge capability would exist so that about an additional 18 brigades could be deployed in addition to the 19 or 20 scheduled brigades.
From General Dan McNeil, former Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) Commander: Within the Army Forces Generation (ARFORGEN) model, brigade combat teams (BCTs) would move through a series of three force pools; they would enter the model at its inception, the "reset force pool", upon completion of a deployment cycle. There they would re-equip and reman while executing all individual predeployment training requirements, attaining readiness as quickly as possible. Reset or "R" day, recommended by FORSCOM and approved by Headquarters, Department of the Army, would be marked by BCT changes of command, preceded or followed closely by other key leadership transitions. While in the reset pool, formations would be remanned, reaching 100% of mission required strength by the end of the phase, while also reorganizing and fielding new equipment, if appropriate. In addition, it is there that units would be confirmed against future missions, either as deployment expeditionary forces (DEFs-BCTs trained for known operational requirements), ready expeditionary forces (REFs-BCTs that form the pool of available forces for short-notice missions) or contingency expeditionary forces (CEFs-BCTs earmarked for contingency operations).
Based on their commanders' assessments, units would move to the ready force pool, from which they could deploy should they be needed, and in which the unit training focus would be at the higher collective levels. Units would enter the available force pool when there is approximately one year left in the cycle, after validating their collective mission-essential task list proficiency (either core or theater-specific tasks) via battle-staff and dirt-mission rehearsal exercises. The available phase would be the only phase with a specified time limit: one year. Not unlike the division-ready brigades of past decades, these formations would deploy to fulfill specific requirements or stand ready to fulfill short-notice deployments within 30 days.
The goal was to generate forces 12–18 months in advance of combatant commanders' requirements and to begin preparing every unit for its future mission as early as possible in order to increase its overall proficiency.
Personnel management would also be reorganized as part of the Army transformation. Previously, personnel was managed on an individual basis in which soldiers were rotated without regard for the effect on unit cohesion. This system required unpopular measures such as "stop loss" and "stop move" in order to maintain force levels. In contrast, the new personnel system would operate on a unit basis to the maximum extent possible, with the goal of allowing teams to remain together longer and enabling families to establish ties within their communities.
Sustainable Readiness ModelEdit
This model is "a structured progression of increased unit readiness over time, resulting in recurring periods of availability of trained, ready, and cohesive units prepared for operational deployment in support of geographic Combatant Commander requirements". ARFORGEN was replaced by the Sustainable Readiness Model (SRM) in 2017. In 2016 the Chief of Staff of the Army identified the objective of a sustainable readiness process as over 66 percent of the Active Army in combat ready state at any time; in 2019 the readiness objective of the National Guard and Army Reserve units was set to be 33 percent; Total Army readiness for deployment is currently 40 percent.
In 2018 Chief of Staff Mark Milley's readiness objective is that all operational units be at 90 percent of the authorized strength in 2018, at 100 percent by 2021, and at 105 percent by 2023. The observer coach/trainers at the combat training centers, recruiters, and drill sergeants are be filled at 100 percent strength by the end of 2018.
The requested strength of the Active Army in FY2020 is increasing by 4,000 additional troops from the current 476,000 soldiers; this request covers the near-term needs for cyber, air & missile defense, and fires (Army modernization). 
The Acting CG of FORSCOM, Lt. Gen. Laura Richardson, has noted that the Sustainable Readiness Model uses the Army standard for maintenance readiness, denoted 10/20, which makes commanders responsible for maintaining their equipment to the 10/20 standard, meaning that "all routine maintenance is executed and all deficiencies are repaired".:p. 79 But Richardson has also spoken out about aviation-related supplier deficiencies hurting readiness both at the combatant commands and at the home stations.
Army Materiel Command (AMC), which uses Army Field Support Brigades (AFSBs) to provision the Combatant Commands, has established Army prepositioned stocks (APS) for supplying entire Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs), at several areas of responsibility (AORs):
- APS-1 is Continental US (CONUS)
- APS-2 in EUCOM, using several sites, will accelerate the flow of up-to-date materiel there, to forward-operating sites. 
- APS-3 in Pacific Ocean, uses ocean-going vessels.
- APS-4 in Indian Ocean
- APS-5 in CENTCOM's Camp Arifjan, Kuwait
Medical readiness is being tested by the U.S. Army Medical Materiel Agency, an LCMC. The LCMCs are stocking three additional locations in the US (APS-1), as well as APS-2 (EUCOM), and Korea, as of 12 February 2019. For example during Operation Spartan Shield, the LCMC's relevant AFSB effected the hand-off of prepositioned stocks to 155th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) within 96 hours. In the same Operation, 155th ABCT was issued an entire equipment set for an ABCT, drawn from APS-5 stocks, over 13,000 pieces.
Air Defense Artillery deploymentsEdit
On 27 March 2018 the 678th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (South Carolina National Guard) deployed to EUCOM, Ansbach Germany for a nine month rotation, for the first time since the Cold War. 10th AAMDC is the executive agent for EUCOM.
In September 2018, the Wall Street Journal reported that four Patriot systems— Two from Kuwait, and one apiece from Jordan and Bahrain are redeploying back to the U.S. for refurbishment and upgrades, and will not be replaced.
As the U.S. Army's only forward-deployed Airborne brigade, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, stationed in EUCOM, was supplied with new communications materiel — Integrated Tactical Networks (ITN) in 2018. New ground combat vehicles, the Infantry Carrier Vehicle - Dragoon (ICVD) are being supplied to 2nd Cavalry Regiment. ICVDs are Strykers with an unmanned turret and 30 mm autocannon (CROWS), and an integrated commander's station, upgraded suspension and larger tires. The Army brigades of EUCOM have been in position for testing materiel, as its elements engaged in a 2018 road march through Europe, training with 19 ally and partner nations in Poland in 2018.
Dynamic force employmentEdit
This initiative, designed by then-DoD-Secretary James Mattis, exercises the ability of selected BCTs to rapidly surge combat-ready forces into a theater, such as EUCOM, on short notice. In several such cases, at the direction of the Secretary of Defense in March 2019, troops were rapidly alerted, recalled and deployed to a forward position, under (simulated) emergency conditions, to prove a capability (such as an ABCT, and a THAAD battery) against near-peers. The ABCT element next participated in a joint live-fire exercise with Polish troops of the 12th Mechanized Brigade, 12th Mechanised Division (Poland) in Drawsko Pomorskie Training Area, Poland. (A Mission Command element of TRADOC served in the role of echelon-above-brigade for the maneuver and interoperability of the joint multi-national armored brigades.) In September 2018, the 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment had already assumed a forward deployment in Poland.  Poland and the US are planning for regular rotations going forward. Similar initiatives are planned for other alliances.
FORSCOM exercised its Emergency deployment readiness exercises (EDREs) in 2019 by sending 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division to the Joint Readiness Training Center in Fort Polk LA by sealift, simultaneously exercising the logistics planners at Fort Drum, the seaports in Philadelphia PA, and Port Arthur TX as well as 2nd BCT. Through the EDRE program, 20 of the ports have been exercised to ready them for sealift deployments.
Force size and unit organizationEdit
Overall, the Army would end up with 71 brigade combat teams and 212 support brigades, in the pre-2013 design. The Regular Army would move from 33 brigade combat teams in 2003 to 43 brigade combat teams together with 75 modular support brigades, for a total of 118 Regular Army modular brigades. In addition the previously un-designated training brigades such as the Infantry Training Brigade at Fort Benning assumed the lineage & honors of formerly active Regular Army combat brigades. Within the Army National Guard, there would be 28 brigade combat teams and 78 support brigades. Within the Army Reserve, the objective was 59 support brigades.(Chief of Staff Mark Milley credits a previous Chief, Creighton Abrams, for placing most of the support brigades in the reserve and national guard, in order to insure that the nation would use the total army, rather than only the active army alone, in an extended war involving the entire nation.):minute 42:30
- United States Army Forces Command headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
- United States Army Futures Command headquarters in Austin, Texas
- United States Army Materiel Command headquartered at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
- United States Army Training and Doctrine Command headquartered at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia
Army service component commandsEdit
- Geographic commands
- United States Army Africa / Ninth Army headquartered at Vicenza, Italy
- United States Army Central / Third Army headquartered at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina
- United States Army North / Fifth Army headquartered at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas
- United States Army South / Sixth Army headquartered at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas
- United States Army Europe / Seventh Army headquartered at Wiesbaden, Germany
- United States Army Pacific headquartered at Fort Shafter, Hawaii
- Functional commands
- United States Army Space and Missile Defense Command headquartered at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama
- United States Army Special Operations Command headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
- Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command headquartered at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois
- United States Army Cyber Command headquartered at Fort Gordon, Georgia
Army direct reporting unitsEdit
- United States Army Reserve Command headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
- United States Army Medical Command (MEDCOM)
- United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) headquartered at Fort Belvoir, Virginia
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- United States Military Academy
- United States Army Military District of Washington (MDW) headquartered at Fort McNair, District of Columbia
- United States Army Criminal Investigation Command (USACIDC) headquartered at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia
- United States Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC)
- First US Army, headquartered at Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois (A component of FORSCOM; responsible for training the reserve components when mobilized for overseas deployment)
- Eighth US Army, headquartered at Camp Humphreys, South Korea (component of United States Forces Korea)
- I Corps headquartered at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
- III Corps headquartered at Fort Hood, Texas
- XVIII Airborne Corps headquartered at Fort Bragg, North Carolina
Divisions and brigadesEdit
The 2018 budget will further reduce 40,000 active-duty soldiers from 490,000 in 2015 to 450,000 by 2018 fiscal year-end. Thirty installations will be affected; six of these installations will account for over 12,000 of those to be let go.
In early 2015, the plan was to cut entire BCTs; by July 2015, a new plan, to downsize a BCT (4,500 soldiers) to a maneuver battalion task force (1,032 soldiers, with the possibility of upsizing if need be) was formulated. In 2015, a plan was instituted to allow further shrinking of the Army, by converting selected brigades to maneuver battalion task forces. A maneuver battalion task force includes about 1,050 Soldiers rather than the 4,000 in a full BCT. This 9 July 2015 plan, however, would preclude rapid deployment of such a unit until it has been reconstituted back to full re-deployable strength. This is being addressed with the #"Associated units" training program from the Reserve and Guard, and the #Sustainable Readiness Model (SRM). Funding has been allocated for two (out of six planned) Security Force Assistance Brigades (SFABs) composed of 529 senior officers and senior NCOs (a full chain of command for a BCT). The changes announced so far affect:
- Every HHBN (2-star, and higher, headquarters battalion) reduces by 10%
- 3rd ABCT, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Benning
- 2nd SBCT, 25th Infantry Division, Schofield Barracks
- 3rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command relocates from Fort Knox to Fort Bragg
- 1st Theater Sustainment Command relocates from Fort Bragg to Fort Knox
- 81st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 40th Infantry Division to become an associated unit (SBCT) of 7th Infantry Division (81st's armor assets to be pre-positioned in Europe).
- 1st Armored Division, at Fort Bliss (Texas), regionally aligned with Central Command (CENTCOM)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Battalion
- 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, converted from Stryker BCT on 20 June 2019
- 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team
- 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team
- 1st Armored Division Artillery
- Combat Aviation Brigade deploys to Afghanistan early 2019
- 1st Armored Division Sustainment Brigade
- 1st Cavalry Division, at Fort Hood (Texas), regionally aligned with European Command (EUCOM)
- 1st Infantry Division, at Fort Riley, (Kansas)
- 2nd Infantry Division, at Camp Humphreys, (South Korea)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Battalion
- 1x Rotation Armored Brigade Combat Team, at Camp Casey, Camp Hovey, and Camp Humphreys, South Korea
- Combat Aviation Brigade, at Camp Humphreys and K-16 Airfield, South Korea
- 2nd Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade, at Camp Carroll, Camp Stanley, and Camp Humphreys, South Korea
- 3rd Infantry Division, at Fort Stewart, (Georgia)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Battalion
- 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team
- 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team
- 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Georgia Army National Guard)
- Task Force 1-28: 1st Battalion 28th Infantry Regiment, at Fort Benning, Georgia
- 3rd Infantry Division Artillery
- Combat Aviation Brigade, at Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia
- 3rd Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade
- 4th Infantry Division, at Fort Carson, (Colorado), regionally aligned with European Command (EUCOM)
- 7th Infantry Division (Headquarters only), at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, (Washington)
- 10th Mountain Division, at Fort Drum, (New York)
- 25th Infantry Division, at Schofield Barracks, (Hawaii)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Battalion
- 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, at Fort Wainwright, (Alaska)
- 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team
- 3rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team
- 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, (Alaska)
- 25th Infantry Division Artillery
- Combat Aviation Brigade
- 25th Infantry Division Sustainment Brigade
- 82nd Airborne Division, at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- 101st Airborne Division, at Fort Campbell, (Kentucky)
- Headquarters & Headquarters Battalion
- 1st Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Air Assault)
- 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Air Assault)
- 3rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Air Assault)
- 101st Airborne Division Artillery
- Combat Aviation Brigade rotates stateside early 2019
- 101st Airborne Division Sustainment Brigade
- 2nd Cavalry Regiment (Stryker BCT), in Vilseck, (Germany)
- 3rd Cavalry Regiment (Stryker BCT), at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- 3rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team, at Fort Polk, (Louisiana)
- 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, in Vicenza, (Italy)
- 11 division headquarters (one division headquarters stationed overseas in South Korea)
Active-duty combat brigades: 31 at the end of 2017
- 11 Armored Brigade Combat Teams
- 1st, 2nd, and 3rd ABCT at Fort Bliss (Texas), part of 1st Armored Division at Fort Bliss (Texas)
- 1st, 2nd, and 3rd ABCT at Fort Hood (Texas), part of 1st Cavalry Division at Fort Hood (Texas)
- 1st and 2nd ABCT at Fort Riley (Kansas), part of 1st Infantry Division at Fort Riley (Kansas)
- 1st and 2nd ABCT at Fort Stewart (Georgia), part of 3rd Infantry Division at Fort Stewart (Georgia)
- 3rd ABCT at Fort Carson (Colorado), part of 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson (Colorado)
- 6 Stryker Brigade Combat Teams
- 1st SBCT at Fort Carson (Colorado), part of 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson (Colorado)
- 1st SBCT at Fort Wainwright (Alaska), administratively part of 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks (Hawaii), but operationally under US Army Alaska at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson (Alaska)
- 1st and 2nd SBCT at Fort Lewis (Joint Base Lewis–McChord) (Washington), administratively under the 2nd Infantry Division at Camp Humphreys (South Korea), operationally under the 7th Infantry Division HQ at Joint Base Lewis–McChord (Washington)
- 2nd Cavalry Regiment (SBCT) at Rose Barracks in Vilseck (Germany), independent SBCT under US Army Europe at Lucius D. Clay Kaserne Barracks (Germany)
- 3rd Cavalry Regiment (SBCT) at Fort Hood (Texas), independent SBCT under III Corps at Fort Hood (Texas)
- 6 Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (Light)
- 2nd IBCT at Fort Carson (Colorado), part of 4th Infantry Division at Fort Carson (Colorado)
- 1st and 2nd IBCT at Fort Drum (New York), part of 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum (New York)
- 2nd and 3rd IBCT at Schofield Barracks (Hawaii), part of 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks (Hawaii)
- 3rd IBCT at Fort Polk (Louisiana), a regular army brigade under the Army National Guard's 36th Infantry Division at Austin (Texas)
- 5 Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (Airborne)
- 1st, 2nd and 3rd IBCT (Airborne) at Fort Bragg (North Carolina), part of 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg (North Carolina)
- 4th IBCT (Airborne) at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson (Alaska), administratively part of 25th Infantry Division at Schofield Barracks (Hawaii), but operationally under US Army Alaska at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson (Alaska) 
- 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team at Caserma Ederle Barracks in Vicenza (Italy), independent brigade under US Army Europe at Lucius D. Clay Kaserne Barracks (Germany)
- 3 Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (Air Assault)
- 12 Combat Aviation Brigades (12/2):
- 3 Military Intelligence Brigades (Expeditionary) (2/3):
- 5 Field Artillery Brigades (8/0):
- 17th Field Artillery Brigade, at Joint Base Lewis–McChord, (Washington)
- 18th Field Artillery Brigade, at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- 41st Field Artillety Brigade, at Grafenwoehr, (Germany)
- 75th Field Artillery Brigade, at Fort Sill, (Oklahoma)
- 210th Field Artillery Brigade, at Camp Casey, (South Korea)
- 6 Air Defense Artillery Brigades (3/0):
- 11th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Fort Bliss, (Texas)
- 31st Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Fort Sill, (Oklahoma)
- 35th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Osan Air Base, (South Korea)
- 38th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Sagami Depot, (Japan)
- 69th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- 108th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- 4 Engineer Brigades (7/4):
- 12 Sustainment Brigades (10/9):
- 16th Sustainment Brigade, in Bamberg, (Germany)
- 528th Sustainment Brigade (Special Operations) (Airborne), at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- Ten Sustainment Brigades as part of active army divisions
- 5 Military Police Brigades (4/4):
- 8th Military Police Brigade, at Schofield Barracks, (Hawaii)
- 16th Military Police Brigade, at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- 18th Military Police Brigade, in Grafenwöhr, (Germany)
- 42nd Military Police Brigade, at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, (Washington)
- 89th Military Police Brigade, at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- 1 Transportation Brigade (0/5):
- 5 Security Force Assistance Brigades (1/0) planned, 1st in 2017:
- 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade, at Fort Benning, (Georgia)
- 2nd Security Force Assistance Brigade, at Fort Bragg, (North Carolina)
- 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigade, at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- 5 Medical Brigades (0/10):
- 8 Signal Brigades (2/2):
- 1st Signal Brigade, at Camp Humphreys, (South Korea)
- 2nd Signal Brigade, in Wiesbaden, (Germany)
- 11th Signal Brigade, at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- 35th Signal Brigade, at Fort Gordon, (Georgia)
- 93rd Signal Brigade, at Fort Eustis, (Virginia)
- 106th Signal Brigade, at Fort Sam Houston, (Texas)
- 160th Signal Brigade, at Camp Arifjan, (Kuwait)
- 516th Signal Brigade, at Fort Shafter, (Hawaii)
- 1 Chemical Brigade (1/1):
- 48th Chemical Brigade, at Fort Hood, (Texas)
- One consequence of a standardized BCT is that actions performed by one BCT can be made in behalf of a successor BCT. Thus pre-positioned stocks can aid in the rapidity of deployment: Army Prepositioned Stocks site in the Netherlands was established 15 Dec 2016, which will store and service about 1,600 U.S. Army vehicles.
- The Army is introducing drones in its combat aviation brigades in order to increase its reconnaissance capability.
- Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Army's first armored multi-purpose vehicle rolls off production line, 16 Dec 2016 The AMPV will replace vehicles for:
- 522 general purpose
- 993 mission command
- 216 medical treatment
- 790 medical evacuation
- 386 mortar carrier
- In the 2013 reform, the active duty brigades are deactivating by 2015, leaving only the National Guard's, and the Reserve's, maneuver enhancement brigades.
- The capabilities as prioritized by the Chief of Staff, will use subject matter experts in the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment, using Cross Functional Teams (CFTs) for:
- Improved long-range precision fires (artillery)— Lead: BG Steve Maranian ...PEO Ammunition (AMMO)
- Next-generation combat vehicle— Lead: BG Dave Lesperance ...PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS)
- Vertical lift platforms— Lead: BG Wally Rugen ...PEO Aviation (AVN)
- Mobile and expeditionary (usable in ground combat) communications network
- Network Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence— Lead: MG Pete Gallagher ...PEO Command Control Communications Tactical (C3T)
- Assured Position Navigation and Timing— Lead: Kevin Coggins
- Air and missile defense— Lead: BG Randall McIntire, ...PEO Missiles and Space (M&S)
- Soldier lethality
- Soldier Lethality— Lead: BG David M. Hodne ...PEO Soldier
- Synthetic Training Environment — Lead: MG Maria Gervais ...PEO Simulation, Training, & Instrumentation (STRI)
- Above, 'dotted line' relationship is denoted by a '...'
- Perkins discusses operationalizing the Army Operating Concept (AOC) AOC="Win in a Complex World"
- "Ready Army is a proactive campaign to increase Army community resilience and enhance force readiness by informing Soldiers, their Families, Army Civilians and contractors of relevant hazards, and encouraging them to
- Be Informed,
- Make A Plan,
- Build a Kit and
- Get Involved." see: DEFCON
- BMC redesignated JMC, New Name Better Reflects Evolving Organizational Mission accessdate=2017-02-16
- David Vergun, Army News Service (December 8, 2017) US Army Futures Command to reform modernization, says secretary of the Army
- AFC announcement, Friday (13 July 2018) Army Officials Announce New Army Command video 34 minutes, 27 seconds
- Modernization turnaround worth the effort, says acting SecArmy McCarthy
- Army’s modernization command taking shape under freshly picked leaders
- Col. Richard Hough (4 January 2018) Opinion: "Army’s Basic Illusions Gone; Time For Futures Command" Breaking Defense.com
- Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (April 8, 2019) Acquisition reform requires culture shift, officials say
- The Army Strategy 2018
- C. Todd Lopez, Defense.gov (July 16, 2019) Milley talks modernization at confirmation hearing: —Milley's priorities: "provide the best military advice, to maintain steady continuity of military leadership, implement the National Defense Strategy with emphasis on increasing the readiness and modernization of the joint force, maintain and grow our network of allies and partners, sustain great power peace in an era of great power competition and provide unwavering support, care and leadership to our troops and their Families."
- Sydney J Freedberg Jr (July 11, 2019) Gen. Milley Pledges To Speak Truth To Trump
- David Vergun, Defense.gov (July 16, 2019) Esper would continue Pentagon emphasis on readiness, partnerships, reform: Esper to prioritize training, modernization, building alliances and partnerships and reforming the Pentagon if he's confirmed to serve as secretary of defense. As Esper is now the nominee, Esper steps down as Acting Sec of defense, and reverts to being Sec of Army; McCarthy steps down as Acting Sec of Army; McCarthy reverts to Under Sec of Army, during the Senate confirmation proceedings.
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (June 4, 2019) Pacific Pathways 2.0 to bolster presence in the theater
- Paul McCleary (April 23, 2019) Build A ‘Five Eyes’ For Military Tech Sharing: Greenwalt proposes to expand Five Eyes to share intelligence
- Secretary Mark Esper and Chief of Staff Mark Milley (MARCH 26, 2019) ON THE POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY
- Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (August 19, 2019) CSA: Prioritizing personnel starts with equal opportunity 40th CSA
- Army News Release (May 24, 2019) Gen McConville confirmed as next chief of staff, 'people' to be his top priority
- IPPS-A News (August 19, 2016) Army Talent Management Task Force Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army
- Joe Lacdan (September 12, 2019) Former Army ranger testifies at confirmation hearing for Army secretary People and values
- Todd South, Military Times (8 May 2019) 4 things the general in charge of the Army's newest command says are needed to win the wars of the future
- Anthony Small, U.S. Army Futures Command (March 13, 2019) Futures Command highlights changes, new structure at SXSW
- Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (28 May 2019) Beyond INF: An Affordable Arsenal Of Long-Range Missiles? INF Treaty likely to expire in August 2019
- Jim Garamone, Defense.gov (August 9, 2019) Milley discusses Army changes as he passes authority
- White, John P.; Deutch, John (March 2003). "SECURITY TRANSFORMATION: Report of the Belfer Center Conference on Military Transformation" (citation). Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College, via Defense Technical Information Center.
- "Statement by General Peter Schoomaker, Chief of Staff United States Army, before the Commission on National Guard and Reserves". Army.mil. 14 December 2006. Archived from the original on 21 December 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-03-06. Retrieved 2010-06-23. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Henry S. Kenyon (June 2006) U.S. Army Reforges Training and Readiness.
- Soldiers need to be ready 100 percent of time, says FORSCOM commander, Army.mil, accessdate=2016-06-05
- Robert M. Gates (5 Jan 2012) "Defense Strategic Guidance"
- Department of the Army announces force structure decisions for fiscal year 2017 accessdate=2017-06-25
- Global security.org: 2017 National Defense Authorization Act "Military Personnel" accessdate=2017-02-02
- McHugh & Odierno, A STATEMENT ON THE POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY 2015, Army.mil, accessdate=2016-06-05
- 2017 DoD Posture Defense Statement
- Mission of the U.S. Army Army.mil, accessdate=2016-09-11
- Army Warfighting Challenges (AWFCs) accessdate=2016-10-25
- THE EVOLUTION OF THE ARMY WARFIGHTING ASSESSMENT
- Army tests new warfighting tech at Army Warfighting Assessment accessdate=2016-10-23
- Special Operations Forces integrate into AWA 17.1 accessdate=2016-10-28
- AWA 17.1: Increasing the pace of battle in a coalition environment accessdate=2016-10-29
- [A RIC-U might be used by a coalition partner to encrypt their individual networks, when interoperating with a US Army voice network.]
- ASA(ALT) Weapon System Handbook (2018) Transportable Tactical Command Communications (T2C2)
- Communications in Motion: Spc. Matthew Marcellus, 1st Armored Division (15 May 2019) Iron Soldiers train on inflatable satellite communications system T2C2
- Mark Pomerleau (March 23, 2018) The Army’s newest satellite antenna is remarkably simple
- Mr. Joe Welch, Lt. Col. Jack "Shane" Taylor and Mr. Michael Beery (July 12, 2016) Network Marketplace: Open for Business and Growing
- Knapp, Brandon (January 18, 2018). "The Army makes it easier for first responders to connect to tactical networks". C4ISRNET. Retrieved 2018-04-17.
- Army prepares to test enhanced network operation tools at NIE 16.2 accessdate=2016-11-05
- Future warfighting calls for semi-independent units, empowered leaders accessdate=2017-02-16
- ""We are going to have to empower [and] decentralize leadership to make decisions and achieve battlefield effects in a widely dispersed environment where subordinate leaders, junior leaders ... may not be able to communicate to their higher headquarters, even if they wanted to," Milley said."C. Todd Lopez May 5, 2017 Army News Service Future warfare requires 'disciplined disobedience,' Army chief says accessdate=2017-05-05
- Army, Marine leaders bring multi-domain concept closer to reality accessdate=2017-02-16
- Air Force may join Army in refining multi-domain concept accessdate=2017-03-18
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (April 03, 2019) How Army’s Multi-Domain Overhaul May Impact The National Guard
- "Brigade combat teams cut at 10 posts will help other BCTs grow | Article | The United States Army". Army.mil. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- "2nd ID unit in Korea to deactivate, be replaced by rotational force - News". Stripes. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- Arpi Dilantsian and Matthew Howard (April 1, 2019) Plan, prepare, practice: An interview with Lt. Gen. Laura Richardson
- "Future of deployments: surge-ready and rotationally-focused | Article | The United States Army". Army.mil. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- Big BCT changes mapped out for 2015 By: Michelle Tan, February 9, 2015, armytimes.com.
- Army Announces Force Structure, Stationing Decisions, DoD News, July 9, 2015.
- (23 April 2018) Army Secretary Esper, senior NCO Dailey discuss modernization, recruiting, retention
- Sydney J Freedberg Jr (May 20, 2019) Army Can Manage Both Mideast & Great Powers: Sec. Esper
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (May 28, 2019) South Korean exercises being revised amid peace talks Abrams USFK assessment
- Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (March 28, 2018) CHIPS Articles: Army Secretary defines goals for coming decade — modernization, Futures Command
- Jeff Martin (15 October 2018) How did the Army find $25 billion for new equipment? video
- Daniel Goure (October 18, 2018) Can Trump Rebuild The Military As Deficits Balloon?
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (October 26, 2018) Joint Experiments Will Pick Budget Winners & Losers: Dunford Task is to cut $33 Billion from 2020 budget
- Youtube: What will $716 Billion Buy You? US Defense Budget 2019 Weapons
- Michael J. Meese (23 Dec 2016) Chapter 4 : The American Defense Budget 2017–2020 Note Fed chart 1970-2026
- Paul Mcleary (October 26, 2018) Trump Orders DoD To Take Surprise $33B Budget Cut 2020 DoD budget cut from $733 billion to $700 billion
- Paul Mcleary (November 14, 2018) The Pentagon’s First-Ever Audit: A Big Disappointment?
- Wesley Morgan (09 December 2018) Trump reverses course, tells Pentagon to boost budget request to $750 billion
- Army Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (February 26, 2019) FY20 budget proposal realigns $30 billion
- Sydney J Freedberg Jr (May 24, 2019) Defense Spending Will Bust BCA Caps: Mark Cancian
- Sydney J Freedberg Jr (May 29, 2019) Army Big 6 Gets $10B More Over 2021-2025
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2015-03-30. Retrieved 2015-03-28. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Cavalry Brigade Combat Team assumes new design, transition nearly complete". U.S. Army. 17 February 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2017.
- Lt. Col. Mike Hammond (July 18, 2019) In Search of Synchronized Tactical Logistics The BSB Commander is responsible for "field trains command post (FTCP) and combat trains command post (CTCP) operations". —Army Field Manual 3-96
- "Ft Hood's 615th ASB trains at McGregor Range", Fort Bliss Monitor 6/26/2013
- 3rd Squadron, 6th Cavalry, in Iraq Army.mil, accessdate=2016-03-18
- 2008 White Paper requesting DIVARTY
- "DIVARTY - Division Artillery". Retrieved 19 October 2016.
- Spc. Matthew Marcellus, 1st Armored Division (MAY 15, 2019) Agile and lethal: 4-27 Field Artillery conducts Table XVIII gunnery training May 7 accessdate=2019-08-11
- Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (March 13, 2019) FY20 budget to boost air & missile defense
- Joe Lacdan (October 22, 2018) Army to fuse laser technology onto air defense system
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-14. Retrieved 2014-09-12. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Lt. Col. Charles L. Montgomery (April 1, 2019) Deploying an SSA's CASL for an armored brigade combat team
- (31 May 2018) Additional supply system focus boosts student knowledge of new technology
- "USA TODAY: Latest World and US News - USATODAY.com". Archive.militarytimes.com. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- 204th Military Intelligence Battalion to join Aerial Intelligence Brigade, Fortblissbugle.com, accessdate=2015-05-21
- Priorities for Our Nation's Army with General Mark A. Milley (23 Jun 2016)
- "CSA explains how skeletal advisory brigades could regenerate force". Retrieved 19 October 2016.
- (16 October 2017) First security force assistance brigade training for deployment
- Lolita C. Baldor (4 May 2017) Associated Press Uncle Sam: We want you... to train others! $5K bonus offered accessdate=2017-05-05
- Security force assistance brigades to free Brigade combat teams from advise, assist mission
- Army Moves Closer to Establishing First Security Force Assistance Brigade
- 1st SFAB promotes first Soldiers to sergeant under new policy
- Jaffe and Ryan (21 January 2018), Washington Post Up to 1,000 more U.S. troops could be headed to Afghanistan this spring
- Jared Keller Task & Purpose (22 Jan 2018) The 1st SFAB’s Afghan Deployment Is A Moment Of Truth For The Global War On Terror for 2018, with subsequent SFABs after the year
- Security Force Assistance Brigade (2 May 2018) ATP 3-96.1 152 pages
- Capt. John May (November 27, 2017) Military Advisor Training Academy prepares 1st SFAB as combat advisors
- Jared Serbu (August 24, 2018) Army experimenting with SOF-tested equipment while building long-term tactical network plan
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (July 18, 2019) Futures Command showcases efforts ahead of upcoming FOC ITN for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd SFABs
- Kimberly Underwood (20 August 2018) U.S. Army Fields Inflatable Satellite Antenna
- (December 21, 2017) Equipping SFABs: A 'Rubik's Cube' of logistics over 5,000 pieces of equipment
- Bridget Lynch & Greg Hall, PEO C3T Public Affairs (September 5, 2018)
- AUSA (16 October 2017) AUSA Video clip, Warriors corner #9: All things Security Force Assistance Brigade (SFAB), part of the article, "First security force assistance brigade training for deployment"
- (6 December 2017) Eyes in the Sky with 1st SFAB
- "1st Security Force Assistance Brigade: Who we are and why You should volunteer" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-10-22. Retrieved 2017-10-22. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- Army creates Security Force Assistance Brigade and Military Advisor Training Academy at Fort Benning accessdate=2017-02-24
- (9 February 2018) 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade holds activation ceremony
- U.S. Army Public Affairs (January 11, 2018) Department of the Army announces upcoming deployment of the 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade
- Army announces activation of second Security Force Assistance Brigade at Fort Bragg
- CSM, 1st Battalion, 2nd SFAB identified
- Bridget Lynch & Greg Hall, PEO C3T Public Affairs (September 5, 2018) Network Support Continues for Army's SFABs
- U.S. Army Office of the Chief of Public Affairs (18 May 2018) Army announces the stationing of three Security Force Assistance Brigades
- Indiana National Guard to stand up new assistance brigade
- SOF News (January 30, 2019) 54th Security Force Assistance Brigade
- C. Todd Lopez (May 8, 2019) Success of first SFAB in Afghanistan proves 'Army got it right,' commander says
- Force Assistance Command Public Affairs (December 3, 2018) Security Force Assistance Command, 2nd Security Force Assistance Brigade activate at Fort Bragg
- Fort Bragg will be home to Security Force Assistance Command
- (4 April 2018) General Officer Assignments
- Maj. Matthew Fontaine (August 18, 2018) 1st SFAB Commander earns 1st Star and Promotion to Brigadier General
- (7 September 2018) 2nd SFAB commander earns first star
- Todd South (8 May 2019) The next Army SFAB deployments might look a whole lot different from recent ones
- Both/article/212541/department_of_the_army_announces_upcoming_2nd_security_force_assistance_brigade_unit_rotation U.S. Army Public Affairs (18 October 2018) Department of the Army announces upcoming 2nd Security Force Assistance Brigade unit rotation to Afghanistan Spring 2019
- Kyle Rempfer (16 July 2019) 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigade activates, preps for Mideast missions
- U.S. Army Public Affairs (August 16, 2019) Army announces upcoming 3rd Security Force Assistance Brigade unit rotation
- Kari Hawkins (AMCOM) (September 16, 2009) Security Assistance Command plants its flag
- Megan Cotton (June 6, 2019) Ensuring Readiness for Strategic Support: Strategic Power Projection
- Col. Rodney H. Honeycutt, Richard A. Bezold, and Robin T. Dothager (September 5, 2017) Establishing Europe's Army pre-positioned stocks
- Justin Graff, 401st AFSB Public Affairs (December 16, 2017) AMC deputy commander assesses APS-5 readiness, combat configuration
- Headquarters, Dept of the Army (July 2019) ADP 6-0 Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces 4 chapters. See also ADP 3-0; ADP 6-22; FM 6-22; ADP 1-1; and ADP 5-0
- David B. Larter (9 Oct 2018) The US Army is preparing to fight in Europe, but can it even get there?
- Capt. Richard Foote, 593rd Sustainment Command (Expeditionary) (April 21, 2017) Putting the expeditionary in ESC
- Maj. Daniel J. N. Belzer (January 2, 2019) Command relationships between corps and ESCs ESC = (Expeditionary Support Command); TSC = (Theater Support Command)
- See, for example Francis J.H. Park (November/December 2007) "The strategic plans and policy officer in the modular division"
- The 29th Division (National Guard) headquarters is deployed as Intermediate Command for ARCENT in Kuwait
- Two National Guard division headquarters are deployed simultaneously for the first time since the Korean war
- "We need two command posts. We need to be able to shut one down and move it while the other is still in the fight." —MG Pat White, CG 1st Armored Division Army senior leaders meet at Bliss for command post huddle accessdate=2017-01-26
- Amy Walker, PEO C3T/PM Tactical Network Public Affairs (January 11, 2018) Army pushing to get Secure Wi-Fi on battlefield to gain strategic edge over enemies
- Staff Sgt. Samuel Northrup (April 1, 2019) New Army vehicles being developed to counter modern threats to Command Post Directed Requirement Pilot Program of prototypes
- Army improves mobility, readiness with new secure wireless systems accessdate=2017-06-09
- Todd South (June 4, 2019) How changes to mission command will mean soldiers taking risks and taking charge on complex battlefields
- AUSA (27 March 2018) Army not ready to announce Futures Command home
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (13 Sep 2018) Futures Command Won’t Hurt Oversight, Army Tells Congress
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (July 19, 2019) In first year, Futures Command grows from 12 to 24,000 personnel
- Army Futures Command Task Force (28 March 2018) "Army Futures Command"
- Austin American-Statesman (12 July 2018) Report: Austin selected as site of Army’s new Futures Command center
- (7 Nov 2017) Army Directive 2017-33 (Enabling the Army Modernization Task Force)
- USArmy tweet: Futures Command will have the overarching objective to achieve clear overmatch in future conflicts, making Soldiers and units more lethal to win the nation's wars, then return home safely.
- Long-range, short term
- Picatinny Arsenal, PEO (AMMO)
- First unit with TRILOS
- Rapid Capabilities Office (RCO) note PNT capability
- Army Will Field 100 Km Cannon, 500 Km Missiles: LRPF CFT
- Vergun, David. "US Army Futures Command to reform modernization, says secretary of the Army". www.army.mil. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
- (13 July 2018) University of Texas System to serve as home base for U.S. Army Futures Command
- Stripes.com: Army’s new Futures Command to set up headquarters at University of Texas
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (August 15, 2018) Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond
- DVIDs video, 24 August 2018 press conference
- Ryan McCarthy (06 October 2017) Army Directive 2017-24 (Cross-Functional Team Pilot In Support of Materiel Development)
- (12 Sep 2017) Army Directive 2017-22 (Implementation of Acquisition Reform Initiatives 1 and 2)
- 3 Pillars of AFC
- Breaking Defense (26 March 2018) Army Outlines Futures Command; Org Chart In Flux
- AUSA (14 June 2018), "Authority Transfers Begin to Army Futures Command"
- Reference for Department of the Army General Order No. 2018-10. (4 June 2018)
- ARL Public Affairs (October 5, 2018) Officials announce new senior executive at Army Research Laboratory
- Army General order G.O.2018-10
- Ms. Audra Calloway (Picatinny) (September 19, 2018) With new Army Futures Command, senior acquisition leader discusses role of Program Executive Offices
- David Vergun, Army News Service (October 10, 2018) Army Futures Command to become 'global command,' says its leader
- Arpi Dilanian and Matthew Howard (April 1, 2019) The number one priority: An interview with Gen. Mark Milley: Readiness (both current and future)
- Gen. David G. Perkins, U.S. Army (November-December 2017) Military Review III "Multi-Domain Battle The Advent of Twenty-First Century War"
- David Vergun (05.31.2017) Multi-domain battle has immediate applications, says Gen. Perkins
- (Sep 16, 2015) Perkins discusses operationalizing the Army Operating Concept
- Maj. Richard W. Gibson (October 1, 2018) Applying Multi-Domain Concepts Against Counter-Space Threats
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (24 Jan 2019) Hack, Jam, Sense & Shoot: Army Creates 1st Multi-Domain Unit an MDO BN for Targeting, I Corps
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (17 September 2018) Trump Eases Cyber Ops, But Safeguards Remain: Joint Staff
- Mark Pomerleau (8 May 2019) New authorities mean lots of new missions at Cyber Command
- PEO C3T May 30, 2018
- Justin Eimers, PEO C3T (October 3, 2018) Network Cross-Functional Team, acquisition partners experimenting to modernize tactical network
- U.S. Army (April 30, 2019) Profile: Program Executive Office for Command, Control and Communications-Tactical (PEO C3T)
- Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (October 25, 2018) Interoperability a key focus in building the Army's future network
- DoD (May 16, 2018) Army Officials Testify on FY 2019 Budget Request
- Mark Pomerleau (April 1, 2019) How the Army will sustain its tactical network of the future ITN to take advantage of Tobyhanna depot
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (3 April 2019) Multi-Domain Networks: The Army, The Allies & AI: Incremental ITN Capability sets '21, '23, '25
- Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (June 21, 2019) New tech, accessibility to improve Army tactical networks
- Amy Walker and Justin Eimers, PEO C3T Public Affairs (April 8, 2019) Multinational exercises aim to improve coalition data sharing
- Shawn Nesaw (March 20, 2019) Latest sensor upgrades boost recon vehicle capabilities NBCRV
- Spc. Miguel Ruiz, Joint Modernization Command (MAY 8, 2019) Back to the future: US, partner nations assess future warfighting capabilities at JMC-sponsored JWA 19
- Maj. Gen. Rodney D. Fogg, Brig. Gen. Douglas M. McBride Jr., and Maj. Graham Davidson (July 18, 2019) Focus:Sustaining the Future Fight LSCO compared to Patton's 3rd Army
- Capt. Matthew Miller (July 18, 2019) Multi-Domain Intelligence Support for Sustainment Risks of non delivery
- Gen. Gustave "Gus" Perna (July 18, 2019) AMC Commander: Battlefield Sustainment Requires Intuition
- Lt. Gen. Michael Lundy, Col. Richard Creed, and Lt. Col. Scott Pence (July 18, 2019) Feeding the Forge: Sustaining Large-Scale Ground Combat Operations
- The Indo-Pacific Theater is "our priority theater"—Mark Esper. Aaron Mehta (27 August 2019) Esper calls for new basing investments in the Pacific Sites to be determined
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (October 11, 2018) Second phase of Multi-Domain Task Force pilot headed to Europe
- Jen Judson (8 September 2019) US Army’s multidomain force emerges in Europe
- Paul McCleary (4 September 2019) Major War Game To Jolt 4 Services, Force Decisions
- Todd South (13 September 2019) Massive simulation shows the need for speed in multi-domain ops "400 participants working with 55 formations, 64 concepts and 150 capabilities"
- Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (September 12, 2019) Army Multi-Domain Wargame Reveals C2 Shortfalls MDC2 software improvements needed
- Lt. Gen. David Perkins (June 18, 2013) Understanding Mission Command is beyond C2
- Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (17 Sep 2019) Target, Kaliningrad: Air Force Puts Putin On Notice
- Headquarters DCS, G3-5-7 (July 23, 2018) U.S. Army Allies and Partners: 9 lines of effort
- An example exercise —Spc. Joseph Knoch, 5th Public Affairs Detachment (July 11, 2019) Guard units join US Army and Hungarian forces in exercise: 3rd 197th Artillery Battalion from the Ohio and New Hampshire National Guards working alongside Hungarian Defense Forces (HDF)
- Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (July 12, 2019) Relationship with allies key to maintaining competitive edge, says SF commander From the perspective of Special Forces
- "Interoperability is huge for our Army; we fight as a coalition..."—Lt. Gen. Jim Richardson Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (April 4, 2019) Allies to join Army Futures Command
- Lt. Col. Edward A. Fraser and Command Sgt. Maj. Robert V. Abernethy (April 1, 2019) Strong Europe: A continental-scale combat sustainment laboratory includes Euler diagram of European alliances, partners, competitors
- Sgt. LaShic Patterson (August 6, 2019) 2/2CR unloads vehicles at the Poti port for AS19 Agile Spirit 19: Vaziani Military Base, Tbilisi, Georgia
- Maj. Kevin Sandell, U.S. Army Central Public Affairs (June 26, 2019) U.S. physician teaches Steppe Eagle 19 medical participants to 'race the Reaper'
- Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (June 13, 2019) Poland Deal Lays Groundwork For Division-Strength Deployment: A division-scale exercise next year in Europe, Defender 2020, will be the largest in a quarter-century. Establishes 7 major elements going forward beyond 2020.
- Wendover Productions (27 August 2019) The US' Overseas Military Base Strategy Estimates 800 current DoD bases, but some of them are transitory. Video clip.
- Eric Schmitt The New York Times (14 July 2019) "Rehearsing for a Shadow War Against a Foe Embraced by Trump" pp. A1, A10.
- National Guard Bureau (January 2019) State Partnership Program See this sub-link: State Partnership Program, for mapping between the states and their allied countries
- Sgt. Christopher Stewart (April 8, 2019) Germany's 1st Armored Division Spearheads Allied Spirit X
- Spc. Yon Henderson (April 17, 2019) Exercise brings American firepower to European partners
- Sgt. Thomas Mort (April 23, 2019) 2-34 Intel team proves invaluable during Allied Spirit X
- Capt. Jay Beeman, 5th Battalion, 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade (April 30, 2019) Combat advisor teams sharpen skills in multinational exercise
- Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (July 19, 2019) Building relationships, interoperability through exchange program
- GEN Charles C. Campbell (June 2009), "ARFORGEN: Maturing the Model, Refining the Process". Army Magazine, AUSA.org
- "Allyn outlines keys to readiness under pressure | Article | The United States Army". Army.mil. 2016-06-13. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- David Vergun (October 9, 2018) Army readiness, lethality increasing amid troubled world, says chief of staff
- Mark Cancian (25 March 2019) 2020 Budget: One Half Step Towards A Great Power Strategy: Notes Army's difficulty reaching end-strength objectives.
- Sgt. LaShawna Custom, 32nd Army Air and Missile Defense Command (March 27, 2019) OC/Ts improved readiness during Roving Sands 19 Observer-Coach/Trainer
- Army Times (17 Nov 2018) The Army is extending recruiters orders by two months
- Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (May 13, 2019) Large cities see jump in recruits
- ‘ AUSA (October 26, 2018) Atrophied’ Recruiting Strategy Being Overhauled surge operation in 22 cities, 3 other actions
- Army Directive 2018-22 (8 Nov 2018) Retention Policy for Non-Deployable Soldiers
- U.S. Army Center for Initial Military Training Staff (May 20, 2019) Army to conduct assessment of alternate ACFT events
- Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management Friday, (August 16, 2019) Soldier and Family Readiness Groups
- Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (June 12, 2019) Army making improvements to Family Readiness Groups
- Devon L. Suits (October 17, 2018) Study reveals impact of Army Families on retention, recruiting: When spouses favor Army life, 93% of Soldiers stay; but when spouses do not, 44% stay in the Army.
- The US Army (Aug 9, 2019) Change of Responsibility Ceremony: Army Chief of staff and sergeant major of the Army
- Strangers as family 32nd AAMDC helps Soldier, family, in need
- US Army (6 March 2019) US Military plans release of Tenant bill of rights
- (6 Feb 2019) Senior leaders discuss upcoming moves to ease family concerns Army to receive authorization for direct hires of personnel, e.g., childcare workers
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (June 11, 2019) Army lengthens tours for Soldiers in Europe, Japan
- But moves in summertime cause satisfaction ratings to drop from 95% down to 80%. The Military Moves Hundreds of Thousands of Families Each Summer. Many of Them Don't Go Well
- aerhq.org, Did you know ..." example notice —p.2A, lower right-hand corner
- Chaplain (Capt.) Calvin Park (20 June 2019) Count the cost page 5b
- Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (August 15, 2019) Army makes changes to Total Army Sponsorship Program
- Army News Service (11 Feb 2019) Installation Management Command to realign under Army Materiel Command
- "We are deeply troubled by the recent reports highlighting the deficient conditions in some of our family housing. It is unacceptable for our families who sacrifice so much to have to endure these hardships in their own homes."—Secretary of the Army, Dr. Mark T. Esper and Chief of Staff of the Army, Gen. Mark A. Milley "US Army statement on military housing". U.S. Army. February 13, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
- (2019 summary) Reuters special report on military housing
- U.S. Army (February 11, 2019) Army Family Readiness
- Secretary of the Army (1 April 2019) Army Directive 2019-17 (Changes to the Soldier and Family Readiness Group Program) Army Directive 2019-17 restrictions on fundraising or commercial tie-ins
- Army.mil, Department of the Army Announces Associated Units Pilot accessdate=2016-03-22
- 36th ID making Guard history in Afghanistan
- Total Army Force leaders plan three-year 'Associated Units' Pilot Army.mil, accessdate=2016-06-01
- Myers, Meghann (2016-03-22). "army-pilot-links-active-guard-and-reserve-units-training-deployments". Armytimes.com. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- Sgt. Audrey Hayes (October 17, 2018) Army Reserve preparing to fight on a new battlefield
- Sgt. Bethany Huff (October 23, 2018) U.S. Army Reserve pilots Deployment Assistance Teams for RFX units
- Capt. Joselyn Sydnor, 653rd Regional Support Group (July 17, 2019) Bliss MSF ROC drill tests MFGI capabilities Mobilization Support Force (MSF).
- Laven2 (20 Nov 2018) 210th Regional Support Group (RSG) Soldiers provide support for civilians of Mobilization & Demobilization (MaD) Brigade S1/transition
- AUSA (8 October 2018) ARMY UPDATES MOBILIZATION MODEL
- Capt. Matthew Pargett (March 25, 2019) Squad tactics tested on new virtual marksmanship trainer
- Sgt. Brandon Banzhaf (April 24, 2019) Focus on teamwork, education helps build a squad of infantrymen
- Franklin Fisher (August 22, 2019) Army overhauls small arms training with tougher standards, combat-like rigor
- Joanna Bradley, CCDC Aviation & Missile Center Public Affairs (April 18, 2019) Aviation, Missile Center teams develops Stryker simulator
- Patti Bielling, Synthetic Training Environment CFT (June 11, 2019) 1st SFAB Soldiers hone close combat skills on Army's newest virtual trainer
- Army rebuilding short-range air defense Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (July 2, 2019) Army rebuilding short-range air defense Manpads training for 14P MOS using synthetic training environment (STE)
- Juliet Van Wagenen (October 10, 2014) Lockheed Martin Delivers Digital Air Ground Integration Range to US Army
- Eric Pilgrim, Fort Knox News (July 22, 2019) Army to break ground on Digital Air-Ground Integration Range this fall
- Sundt Orogrande (2013 est.) Digital Air Ground Integration Range (DAGIR)
- Mario J. Hoffmann (October 1, 2018) Modernizing the Army's OPFOR program to become a near-peer sparring partner
- Army Regulation AR 10–87 Glossary (11 December 2017) "Army Commands, Army Service Component Commands, and Direct Reporting Units" p.53
- Sean Kimmons (October 11, 2018) Second phase of Multi-Domain Task Force pilot headed to Europe
- Office of the Chief of Public Affairs (Wednesday, October 4, 2017) Readiness 2017
- "STAND-TO! Army Readiness Guidance, Army G-3/5/7 (Thursday, May 19, 2016)". Retrieved 19 October 2016.
- Capt. Clare Saxton and 1st Lt. Getoar Luzha (November 20, 2017) 2nd Cavalry Regiment Stryker common chassis course
- CSA Mark Milley (20 Jan 2016) Army Readiness Guidance, 2016/2017
- ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 Page 32 lists how this handbook is organized. 440 pages.
- By Modernization priority
- By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely — °Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
- ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404
- HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES. UNITED STATES SENATE, ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS,FIRST SESSION (MARCH 25, 2015) THE CURRENT STATE OF READINESS OF U.S.FORCES IN REVIEW OF THE DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 AND THE FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM
- Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (April 17, 2019) Army Tells Shoddy Suppliers: Shape Up
- Miles Brown (April 18, 2019) AMCOM transforming to support multi-domain operations Bill Marriott: the aviation LCMC is responsible
- JOHN VANDIVER, STARS AND STRIPES (January 18, 2018) ‘Big Red One’ deploying division headquarters for Europe mission
- (2008) Army Prepositioned Stocks: Indispensable to America’s Global Force-projection Capability
- (19 Sep 2018) New G-8 embraces streamlining tech acquisition
- Paul McLeary (3 July 2019) US Upgrades Ukrainian Ports To Fit American Warships Maritime Operations Centers at Ochakiv and Mykolaiv
- ASC Public Affairs release (9 September 25, 2012) Army strategic flotilla
- (17 February 2019) Reforming for Readiness: CECOM brings AMC up to speed
- Ellen Crown, U.S. Army Medical Materiel Agency Public Affairs (August 9, 2018) Army Tests Readiness of Medical Prepositioned Stocks
- Justin Graff, 401st AFSB Public Affairs (July 13, 2018) Largest ever equipment issue from APS-5 to support Operation Spartan Shield
- Kyle Rempfer (2 April 2018) US air defense artillery brigade begins new European mission for first time since Cold War
- (26 September 2018) U.S. Pulling Some Missile-Defense Systems Out of Mideast
- Michael Bachner (26 September 2018) US said to pull Patriot air-defense systems from Mideast as threats shift
- Spc. Kelsey VanFleet (September 28, 2018) US Army Europe: Modernizing at the tip of the spear
- John Vandiver, Defense Media Activity (27 March 2019) Soldiers head to Europe: Pentagon sends Fort Bliss troops on snap deployment
- David Burge (20 March 2019) B-2 THAAD deploys to Israel: 11th ADA Bde. unit participates in joint rapid deployment exercise
- Capt. Robert N Durr 10th AAMDC (March 14, 2019) U.S. Deploys THAAD to Israel
- Capt. Aaron Smith, 174th Air Defense Artillery Brigade (17 April 2019) USEUCOM concludes 11th ADA, THAAD task force deployment to Israel
- Sgt. 1st Class Jason Epperson (May 22, 2019) US deploys THAAD anti-missile system in first deployment to Romania
- Defence Blog (7 September 2019) U.S. redeploys highly advanced anti-missile defense system from Romania —10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command news release. (10th AAMDC provided mission command for the exercise)
- Spc. Christina Westover, 24th TPASE (April 10, 2019) Eurovision 2nd ABCT Soldiers, Polish 12th Mech. display might
- Sgt Sarah Kirby 278th Armored Cavalry Regiment, Tennessee Army National Guard (September 2018) Tenn. Army National Guard Assumes Responsibility of NATO’s eFP Battle Group Poland!
- Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (May 6, 2019) New capabilities, rotations to bolster Army presence in Eastern Europe
- WSJ (12 June 2019) US plans new military deployment in Poland
- Lolita C. Baldor, The Associated Press (11 June 2019) Officials: US to send about 1,000 more troops to Poland
- U.S. Army Sgt. Kyle Larsen, 5th Mobile Public Affairs Detachment (June 27, 2019) 174th ADA and NATO demonstrate lethality over 16-day span Tobruq Legacy 2019 (TOLY19) Ustka, Poland
- Congressman Pete Gallego announces statement by Chief of Staff of the Army, Jun 26, 2013: by 2019, the Regular Army is planned to be 490,000 troops, down from 570,000 in 2012. Archived 2014-09-13 at the Wayback Machine Gallego.house.gov, accessdate=2014-09-03
- Brigade combat teams cut at 10 posts will help other BCTs grow Army.mil, accessdate=2014-09-03
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-08-24. Retrieved 2012-06-20. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Army outlines plan to inactivate 7 brigade combat teams | Army Times". armytimes.com. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- Army to re-align brigades, Army.mil, accessed 2015-07-10
- "3rd Brigade Combat Team transitions into task force". Retrieved 19 October 2016.
- (15 June 2017) Department of the Army announces force structure decisions for fiscal year 2017
- (18 May 2017) Security force assistance brigades to free brigade combat teams from advise, assist mission
- Army to cut 40,000 Soldiers, 17,000 civilians, Army.mil, accessed 2015-07-10
- Mission Command in the Regionally Aligned Division Headquarters p.5, Usacac.army.mil, accessed 2015-10-16
- 1st AD Headquarters was deployed to Iraq, 12 July 2017 —1ST AD TAKES ON MISSION accessdate=2017-07-22
- David Burge (12 June 2019) ‘Ready First’ gets an A: 1st SBCT to become 1st ABCT June 20, infantry battalions to reflag
- 1st Armored Division Public Affairs Office (September 20, 2018) Fort Bliss-based 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team to be converted to an Armored Brigade
- (20 September 2018) Army to transition two brigades to add heavy firepower as it prepares for near-peer conflict
- Staff Sgt. Kris Bonet, 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division (SEPTEMBER 4, 2019) M1A2 SEP V2 arrive ‘Ready First’ receives tanks following armor conversion
- U.S. Army Public Affairs (October 18, 2018) Department of the Army announces upcoming 1st Armored Division Combat Aviation Brigade unit rotation
- Laven2 (24 Oct 2018) ‘Heavy Cav’ prepares for CAB deployment FARPs, Live fire, and AAI RQ-7 Shadow training
- Roeder, Tom (2015-05-12). "Sustainment Brigade Changes Name, Gets Ready to Deploy to Afghanistan". Military.com. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- Combined Resolve IV Archived 2015-05-25 at the Wayback Machine, accessed 2015-05-23
- 2nd ABCT deploys to South Korea in the summer of 2017 —Department of the Army announces 1st Cavalry Division deployment accessdate=2017-07-22
- "'Dagger' brigade readies for AFRICOM missions". Retrieved 19 October 2016.
- Army to pair National Guard, Reserve units with active-duty units, Stars and Stripes, by Corey Dickstein, dated 22 March 2016, last accessed 27 November 2016
- "Army lays out plan to cut 40,000 soldiers". Armytimes.com. 2015-07-10. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- Media Operations Division. "4th Infantry Division to support Operation Atlantic Resolve | United States European Command". Eucom.mil. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
- In May 2017, during their rotation to EUCOM, Combined Resolve VIII, 3rd ABCT/4th ID combined with land and aviation forces from six partner nations, Albania, Finland, Hungary, Kosovo, Romania and the Ukraine. The combined team will operate within 3rd ABCT's combined arms structure. The scenario is to defend a European nation from attack. in a NATO Article V incident. —(31 May 2017) 3/4 ID evolves into multinational brigade at Combined Resolve VIII accessdate=2017-07-18
- "7th ID reorganizing to be deployable, Army announces". Armytimes.com. 2014-12-23. Retrieved 2015-11-11.
-  Archived May 18, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-12-23. Retrieved 2016-12-26. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- 2nd IBCT/10th MD is to deploy to Iraq, Fall 2017 —Department of the Army announces 10th Mountain Division deployment
- Soldiers of the 2nd BCT/101st Airborne Division served as the first rotational brigade during NIE 17.2 in July 2017 at Fort Bliss. 1st Battalion 502nd Infantry Regiment served as their opposing force. —David Burge (16 July 2017) "Fort Campbell soldiers travel to Bliss for modernization mission" El Paso Times
- Spartan Brigade to become Army's newest armored brigade accessdate=2016-12-02
- MICC supporting Army's efforts for newest armored brigade (24 March 2017) accessdate=2017-03-30. The 10th in the Active component, but the 15th ABCT in the total force.
- "4th Brigade Combat Team (Airborne)". www.army.mil. Retrieved 2018-01-08.
- Feickert, Andrew. "U.S. Army's Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress" (PDF). Updated May 5, 2006. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-07-28. Retrieved 2017-06-30. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help); Cite journal requires
- 2007 Army Modernization Plan
- Moran, Michael (2007-09-14). "U.S. Army Force Restructuring, "Modularity," and Iraq". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 2008-02-07. Retrieved 2007-09-20. Cite uses deprecated parameter
- GlobalSecurity.org article about current transformation
- GlobalSecurity.org article about Force XXI
- Addendum D: Naming Convention for Headquarters and Forces
- John Gordon, "Transforming for What? Challenges Facing Western Militaries Today", Focus stratégique, Paris, Ifri, November 2008.
- ARFORGEN — Army Force Generation Graphic showing the three stages before deployment, discussion, ARFORGEN from Warrant Officer viewpoint, and example of training for deployment