Open main menu

Tone policing (also tone trolling, tone argument, and tone fallacy) is an ad hominem (personal attack) and antidebate tactic based on criticizing a person for expressing emotion. Tone policing detracts from the validity of a statement by attacking the tone in which it was presented rather than the message itself.

Contents

Who gets tone policedEdit

Tone policing is often aimed at women and may derive from the stereotype that women are more emotional than men and particularly the angry black woman stereotype. In Bailey Poland's book Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online, she addresses that tone policing is frequently aimed at women and attempts to derail or silence opponents who may be lower on the "privilege ladder". She identifies tone policing as a form of cybersexism.

This tactic allowed the men to take control of the conversation and thus position themselves as the authority figures on what strategies for dispute were acceptable. In changing their tactics to criticizing how the women spoke instead of addressing what the women said, the men created an environment in which the outcome of the dispute was not decided on the merits of an argument but on whether the men chose to engage with the arguments in good faith. Meanwhile the men could participate in the dispute by engaging respectfully or by utilizing cybersexist harassment and aggressive tactics, and both strategies were regarded as valid—or, at least, none of the men received criticism for how they spoke, regardless of the tactics they used. These types of behaviors appear everywhere on the Internet; anywhere people congregate and talk, such tactics are likely to make an appearance. Women in many conversations online are placed in a no-win situation in which their speech becomes grounds for disagreement and harassment regardless of topic or conversational strategies, and their points are ignored or discarded. Meanwhile, men assume the role of arbiter and engage in whatever conversational tactics they please, expecting their choices to be regarded as valid. The strategy of creating these double standards is sometimes referred to as tone trolling or tone policing. While anyone can engage in tone policing, it is frequently aimed at women as a way to prevent a woman from making a point in the discussion.[1]

In Keith Bybee's How Civility Works, he notes that feminists, Black Lives Matter protesters, and anti-war protesters have been told to "calm down and try to be more polite". He argues that tone policing is a means to deflect attention from injustice and relocate the problem in the style of the complaint, rather than address the complaint itself.[2] In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. condemned this type of silencing, writing that he was "gravely disappointed" with the "white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than justice."[3]

CausesEdit

While tone policing may be an intentional tactic to derail a discussion or debate, other causes are possible. Bruce Byfield has written that steering observers away from the validity of an argument is only one of many possible motivations for raising concerns about tone during a heated debate.[4]

CriticismEdit

While ad hominem fallacies of relevance are often autologies, critics have argued that tone policing is a flawed concept simply because it is autological, meaning calling out tone policing is a form of tone policing. As discussed by The Frisky's Rebecca Vipond Brink, "The problem with telling someone that you have a right to express yourself as angrily as you want to without them raising an objection is that you’re also inherently telling them that they don’t have a right to be angry about the way you’re addressing them."[5]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Bailey Poland (2016) Haters: Harassment, Abuse, and Violence Online, p. 46. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 9781612348728.
  2. ^ Keith Bybee (2016) How Civility Works, p. 30. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9781503601543.
  3. ^ Chhokra, Shubhankar (2016-04-08). "The Myth of Tone Policing". The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  4. ^ Byfield, Bruce (2014-03-20). "Separating discussions of tone from tone arguments". Retrieved 2018-04-26.
  5. ^ Rebecca Vipond Brink (2014-09-07). "Calling Out Tone-Policing Has Become Tone-Policing". Retrieved 2016-11-18.

External linksEdit