Timothy F. Messer-Kruse (born (1963-03-13)March 13, 1963) is an American historian who specializes in American labor history. His research into the 1886 Haymarket affair led him to reappraise the conventional narrative about the evidence presented against those brought to trial.[1] He has also written on banking history and race relations in the United States.

Timothy Messer-Kruse
Born (1963-03-13) March 13, 1963 (age 61)
OccupationHistorian
Academic background
Alma materUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
Academic work
Main interestsLabor history

Life and career edit

Messer-Kruse attended University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he received his bachelor's degree in History & South Asian Studies in 1988, his master's degree in U.S. History in 1990, and his doctorate in 1994. In 1995 he was appointed Assistant Professor of Labor History at University of Toledo, becoming an Associate Professor in 2000 and Associate Director of the Humanities 2000 Program in 2002. In 2003 he was named Chair of the department. In 2006, he was appointed Professor of History and Chair of the Department of Ethnic Studies at Bowling Green State University.

In the early 2000s Messer-Kruse was prompted to study the original court documents from the Haymarket affair trials. Despite the prevailing belief that little or no evidence was presented at trial, he noted that evidence had been presented over the course of six weeks. He published his findings in books and academic papers including The Haymarket Conspiracy. Messer-Kruse and editors of Wikipedia were subsequently involved in a conflict over the content and editing procedure of the Wikipedia article on the Haymarket affair.[2] In 2012, Messer-Kruse described his experiences in the Chronicle of Higher Education,[3] on the NPR podcast On The Media,[4] in The Atlantic,[5] and on National Public Radio.[6]

Publications edit

References edit

  1. ^ Mann, Leslie (September 14, 2011). Reworking infamous Haymarket trial. Chicago Tribune
  2. ^ Miller, John J. (February 11, 2013). "What happened at Haymarket? A historian challenges a labor-history fable". National Review. Vol. 65, no. 2. p. 31. ISSN 0028-0038 – via Gale.
  3. ^ Messer-Kruse, Timothy (February 12, 2012). "The 'Undue Weight' of Truth on Wikipedia". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved March 17, 2012.
  4. ^ "The Professor Versus Wikipedia". On The Media. WNYC. Archived from the original on March 12, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2012.
  5. ^ Rosen, Rebecca J. (February 16, 2012). Does Wikipedia Have an Accuracy Problem? The Atlantic.
  6. ^ Inskeep, Steve (October 3, 2012). Wikipedia Policies Limit Editing Haymarket Bombing. NPR Morning Edition, NPR.
  7. ^ Review, by M. McAvoy in Enterprise and Society (December 2006) 7(4): 845-847. doi: 10.1093/es/khl062
  8. ^ Jentz, John B. (2013). "Review of The Trial of the Haymarket Anarchists Terrorism and Justice in the Gilded Age". Indiana Magazine of History. 109 (2): 171–172. doi:10.5378/indimagahist.109.2.0171. ISSN 0019-6673. JSTOR 10.5378/indimagahist.109.2.0171.

External links edit