Template talk:WikiProject Women writers

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jpbrenna in topic Sandbox edits ready for review

Categories

edit

I've created the missing ones. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox edits ready for review

edit

I added the WikiProject Women articles category to the template so that articles tagged with WP Women writers appear in the article alerts for WP:Women. Can this be reviewed and pushed live? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 01:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

This seems like a good idea. I don't know how to push the live, but hoping someone else can sort that out. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Hmlarson and Rosiestep: The sandbox, as it stands, contains code for the Classical women writers task force which isn't live. Is that intended to go live too? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
It looks like that was added by you in May 2015? I don't see a problem with it. Hmlarson (talk) 20:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't have added it to the sandbox without a request to do so from somebody. Maybe whoever asked for it later forgot. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I believe that I requested it. I have become rather more busy than I was at that time, and I haven't made any significant contributions since 2015. I am currently the only contributor listed at this project, but hopefully the template updates will help attract more contributors.--Jpbrenna (talk) 15:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Redrose64 - this was never updated. Can you please push live? Hmlarson (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Hmlarson: OK on your changes. @P Aculeius, SpartaN, Jpbrenna, and Rosiestep: changes discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome/Archive 22#Template edits and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women writers/Archive 2#Classical women writers task force have not been put live. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello @P Aculeius, SpartaN, Jpbrenna, Hmlarson, and Redrose64: I am supportive of these changes. Anything to make our work on women writers more collaborative across eras, languages, projects, and so forth: count me in. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Redrose64 I've left user talk page follow-up messages for P Aculeius and SpartaN. Jpbrenna hasn't been active in two months. Hmlarson (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
I saw this, just didn't have time to respond until now. Not really sure what I'm needed for; I fully support the concept as far as I understand it, but this really isn't an area I tend to work with. I admit my work is a little insular at times; I edit certain articles intensively and others occasionally, and I might work on articles belonging to this project from time to time, but project templates and technical details aren't really in my expertise. I routinely add CGR templates (rarely others) to relevant new articles, but that's about as far as my involvement goes at this time. Anyway, it looks fine as far as I can tell. P Aculeius (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Redrose64 - there appears to be consensus here from three editors. Can you please push live? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
The changes discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome/Archive 22#Template edits and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women writers/Archive 2#Classical women writers task force are now live, so you can make edits like this. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Redrose64. 🌹 Hmlarson (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply