Though there is little controversy that eukaryotes and archaeans are relatively closely related, the taxonomical name Neomura is not widely accepted. I suggest it not be included in this template. Sky6t 02:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
It's been removed, before I could get to it. I doubt that will itself be controversial. If so, I would controvert a reversion. :-) — SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 04:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 March 2020Edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would like to make a request to have the "Domain: Eukaryota" always displayed in the "Template:Taxonomy" for the taxon "Rigifilida". Videsh Ramsahai (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
@Videsh Ramsahai and Izno:|always_display= can only be placed in the taxonomy template of the taxon to which it applies. So you couldn't make it only display just for a hierarchy starting with the clade Rigifilida; if |always_display=yes were added here, it would cause the domain to be displayed in every eukaryote taxobox, for which I'm sure there's no consensus.
On the other hand, it does look odd for the hierarchy to end with "Clade: Opimoda". The solution, which I'm happy to implement, is:
This will mean that any automated taxobox whose classification currently ends at "Clade: Opimoda" will change to end at "Domain: Eukaryota".
However, the system at present wouldn't recognize "Eukaryota/displayed" as a "colour-setting taxon", because it doesn't strip off the qualifier, and so flags an error. I need to fix that - which is desirable anyway – first. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Templates may only be edited by registered users. After you've registered and made some regular edits to articles and such, you can then apply to become a template editor, if that's what you want to do. Happy Holidays to you and yours!P.I. Ellsworth - ed.put'r there 12:19, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 May 2022Edit