This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I confess that I'm a little confused as to why Charles Stewart, a relatively minor Alberta political figure (well, major in that he was Premier, but minor in that he was a Premier that almost nobody had ever heard of) graces this stub template when we have suitable images of much more significant Premiers such as Alexander Rutherford, John E. Brownlee, William Aberhart, Ernest Manning, and Ed Stelmach (for those fans of recentism). What do people think about changing the image? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
At the time, there were very few good premier pictures avaliable, and this is still true. I think Manning would be a excellent choice since he was the longest serving premier, and also a senator. But the article "Ernest Manning" doesn't even have a picture in it!!! --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 20:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Because I haven't gotten to that article yet (I'm early in the process of trying to get the Premiers of Alberta up to featured topic). There are some pictures of him on Commons, though - this one's not bad. Should we give it a shot? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
