- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Principiala edit
- ... that the moth lacewing genus Principiala is known for three, possibly four, fossils?
- Reviewed: Lobophyllia hemprichii
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 23:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC).
- DYK checklist template
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- n/a
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed: - n/a
- Used in article: - n/a
- Clear at 100px: - n/a
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Nominated less than two hours after creation, this article is definitely new enough. Hook is only 98 characters, and is as intriguing as any scientific info about something dead and gone can be, but lacks a cite immediately following its source sentence in the article. With that supplied, the article is good to go.Georgejdorner (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Citations added to the hook sentence, a compilation of the total fossils described in each of the three papers.--Kevmin § 01:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, there's cites, all right. Hook problem definitely solved. Take this nom away for DYK.Georgejdorner (talk) 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)