Template:Did you know nominations/Lionel Bostock

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Lionel Bostock, Garluark edit

  • ... that in 1927-8 Lionel Bostock led a patrol that captured the Nuer prophet Garluark for the second time? First capture: Daly, M. W. (2003). Empire on the Nile: The Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, 1898-1934. Cambridge University Press. p. 399. ISBN 9780521894371. Retrieved 14 January 2019.; second capture (by Bostock): Daly p398 plus Woodward, Peter (1995). British documents on foreign affairs: Part 2. From the First to the Second World War. Series G. Africa, 1914 - 1939. Egypt and the Sudan, January 1927 - June 1929 / ed. Peter Woodward. Univ. Publ. of America. p. 109. ISBN 9780890936177. Retrieved 13 January 2019.

Created by AssociateAffiliate (talk) and Dumelow (talk). Nominated by Dumelow (talk) at 10:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC).

  •  Doing... starting review for double nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Lionel Bostock review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: No - See comments below
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Created January 9, and nominated five days later, new enough. Length and sourcing adequate. Neutral in tone. No copyvios detected. QPQ completed. Flibirigit (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Garluark review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: No - See comments below
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Created and nominated same day. Length and sourcing adequate. Neutral in tone. No copyvios detected. QPQ is completed. Flibirigit (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Hook discussion The wording of the hook in this nomination led me to believe that Bostock's patrol captured Garluark twice. The Garluark article is more clear that his captures were by separate patrols, one by Fergusson and the other by Bostock. The Bostock article mentions only one capture of Garluark. The hook will need to be amended, with similar wording in the two corresponding articles. I'm open-minded as to the actual wording. Flibirigit (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Hi Flibirigit, thanks for your review. A few suggestions for alternate hooks:
  • Let me know if any work for you? - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
ALT1 is adequate and similarily discussed in both articles. ALT2 is slightly more interesesting, but the article on Bostock does not mention anything about Garluark's restoration. It could be added quickly. ALT3 might be too simple, as it does not hint at a reason for the capture. Flibirigit (talk) 15:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Flibirigit: I am wary of focusing too much on Garluark in Bostock's article but I've added a mention of his restoration - Dumelow (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
ALT1, ALT2 and ALT3 are good now. No preference given, willing to let promoter choose. Flibirigit (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)