- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by valereee (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hu Peizhao edit
- ... that when Hu Peizhao argued that capital investors receiving economic returns was reasonable allocation of production gains, he was sharply criticized by Marxists for justifying exploitation of labour? Source: Multiple Chinese sources in article. Unfortunately none of the English sources discussing his views on Google books allow preview.
- Reviewed: Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Bibikov
Created by Zanhe (talk). Self-nominated at 01:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC).
- Article is new enough at the time of nomination, is long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used, hook is interesting enough and cited to reliable sources. (Albeit giving me an interesting window into the degree of copypasting going on in the world of Chinese journalism, but that has nothing to do with the Wikipedia article.) QPQ done, good to go.
_dk (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Article is new enough at the time of nomination, is long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used, hook is interesting enough and cited to reliable sources. (Albeit giving me an interesting window into the degree of copypasting going on in the world of Chinese journalism, but that has nothing to do with the Wikipedia article.) QPQ done, good to go.
