Open main menu

Temnothorax is a genus of ants in the subfamily Myrmicinae. It contains more than 350 species.[4]

20140427 163127 7375M.JPG
Temnothorax affinis, Belgium
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Myrmicinae
Tribe: Crematogastrini
Genus: Temnothorax
Mayr, 1861
Type species
Myrmica recedens
Nylander, 1856
365 species

Antillaemyrmex Mann, 1920
Chalepoxenus Menozzi, 1923
Croesomyrmex Mann, 1920
Dichothorax Emery, 1895
Epimyrma Emery, 1915[a]
Icothorax Hamann & Klemm, 1967
Leonomyrma Arnol'di, 1968
Macromischa Roger, 1863
Myrafant Smith, M.R., 1950
Myrmammophilus Menozzi, 1925
Myrmetaerus Soudek, 1925[a]
Myrmoxenus Ruzsky, 1902[a]
Protomognathus Wheeler, W.M., 1905

Temnothorax schaumii, Maryland


The workers of Temnothorax species are generally small. Colonies are typically monogynous, although facultative polygyny has been documented in several species. Colony populations are usually quite small, often with less than 100 workers. However, several studies have found colonies of some species to be widely dispersed with several to many satellite nests. Many species are arboreal, living within hollow stems, old beetle or termite galleries, or in galls. Temnothorax species appear to be trophic generalists, feeding on a wide variety of scavenged items, including the elaiosomes of seeds. None have been documented to be active or aggressive predators.[5]


Recent molecular phylogenetic studies show that the genera Chalepoxenus, Myrmoxenus and Protomognathus are nested within Temnothorax, and that the latter is distinct from the more distantly related genera Formicoxenus, Leptothorax and Harpagoxenus. Species in these 'satellite' genera live as social parasites within the nests of other species of Temnothorax.[5]

Social behaviorsEdit

Temnothorax have been studied to show interesting[according to whom?] displays of social structures through communication, colony responsibility, and influence.

Communication among ants has been observed[by whom?] and assumed to be entirely influenced through substrate-bound odor cues. However, this previous determined social factor has been disproved among the Temnothorax as recorded in the study conducted by Sean R Bowens, Daniel P Glatt, and Stephen C Pratt. Their study observed the navigational influences during emigration. The study consisted of forcing emigration in a colony to a new nest and change the visual and odor cues to the old nest. The new nest was rotated 60 degrees around the old nest in order to keep the visual cues but expel odor cues. The ants were then observed by their success in finding their way back to the old nest. When the odor cues were obstructed but the visual cues were not the ants did not have a problem locating the old nest. The study then changed to remove both the odor and visual cues. When this was done the ants showed disoriented behavior when searching for the old nest. Lastly, the study observed the ants when the visual cue was obstructed but not the odor cues. It was surprisingly[according to whom?] discovered that when the visual cues were obstructed and the ant had only odor cues to use for navigation the ants continued to display disoriented behavior and not only could not find the old nest, they walked in the opposite direction from it. This has led the study to conclude that among Temnothorax this species relies on visual cues rather than odor cues, and it is now assumed that odor cues are simply used to mark territory.[6]

Among the Temnothorax it has been studied as to how effectively the queen of a colony can dominate the reproductive decisions of her workers. In a study completed by Elisabeth Brunner, Johannes Kroiss, Andreas Trindl, and Jürgen Heinze, the queens of different colonies among similar species were observed in their influence over the reproduction of male workers; and whether or not the queen was manipulating their reproduction through active suppression or by implanting an honest signal of pheromones to broadcast fertility status. The study looked at queens in a mixed-species colonies and in colonies of the same species and at the cast-specific patterns of the cuticular hydrocarbons present. In the mixed- species colonies the queens were not able to completely suppress the reproduction of the male workers. In the colonies consisting of the same species the queen was able to suppress the male workers. It could be that the chemical profiles of the cuticular hydrocarbons differentiated between the queens of separate species. However, since the queens were still able to suppress the male workers somewhat, this supports the hypothesis that queens use an honest signal to manipulate the reproduction of male workers.[7]

In a study completed by Anna Dornhaus, Jo-Anne Holley, and Nigel R. Franks, the communal responsibilities within the colonies of Temnothorax were observed to determine if the size of a colony influences the division of labor among workers. By studying 11 colonies of both large and small population sizes (a small colony to consist of 200 to 400 individuals and a large colony to consist of 500 to 700 individuals) with approximately less than 1100 individually marked worker ants the researchers were able to determine how tasks were divided and the proportion of how many workers were active or inactive in the completion of tasks. The researchers charted seven different task required to be done during the emigration process from an old nest to a new one: scouting, brood transport, adult transport, collection of food which was separated into two tasks for collecting dead flies (Drosophila) and collecting honey solution, collection of sand materials for wall building, and the actual task of wall building. It was observed that between the sizes of the large and small colonies the ratio of active and non-active works was consistent, with the larger colonies having a slightly higher ratio of active workers but not enough to be statistically significant. It was also observed that among active and inactive workers it was consistent that usually less than 25% and never more than 50% of the workers were active. This could be that the non-active workers were completing tasks that were not being observed. Specialization of tasks was also not determined by colony size. However of the active workers it was shown that there was a disproportion of the rate at which active workers complete tasks with typically a few individuals doing more of the work than the other active workers. These ratios were also consistent in times when either a high or low phase of activity was required to complete emigration to the new nest.[8]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b c Myrmoxenus (including its junior synonyms Epimyrma and Myrmetaerus) was synonymized under Temnothorax by Ward et al. (2015),[2] but the change was not accepted by Heinze et al. (2015) due to insufficient available data.[3]


  1. ^ Bolton, B. (2014). "Temnothorax". AntCat. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  2. ^ Ward, Philip S.; Brady, Sean G.; Fisher, Brian L.; Schultz, Ted R. (July 2014). "The evolution of myrmicine ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Systematic Entomology. 40 (1): 61. doi:10.1111/syen.12090. ISSN 1365-3113.
  3. ^ Heinze, Jürgen; Buschinger, Alfred; Poettinger, Theo; Suefuji, Masaki (2015). "Multiple Convergent Origins of Workerlessness and Inbreeding in the Socially Parasitic Ant Genus Myrmoxenus". PLoS ONE. 10 (7): e0131023. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1031023H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131023. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4519230. PMID 26221735.
  4. ^ "Genus: Temnothorax". AntWeb. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
  5. ^ a b Snelling, R.; Borowiec, M.; Prebus, M. (2014). "Studies on California ants: A review of the genus Temnothorax (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)". ZooKeys. 372 (372): 27–89. doi:10.3897/zookeys.372.6039. PMC 3909803. PMID 24493957.
  6. ^ Bowens, Sean R.; Glatt, Daniel P.; Pratt, Stephen C. (May 9, 2013). "Visual Navigation during Colony Emigration by the Ant Temnothorax rugatulus". PLOS ONE. 8 (5): e64367. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...864367B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064367. PMC 3650068. PMID 23671713.
  7. ^ Brunner, Elisabeth; Kroiss, Johannes; Trindl, Andreas; Heinze, Jürgen (2011). "Queen pheromones in Temnothorax ants: Control or honest signal?". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-55. PMC 3060118.
  8. ^ Dornhaus, A.; Holley, J.-A.; Franks, N. R. (2009). "Larger colonies do not have more specialized workers in the ant Temnothorax albipennis". Behavioral Ecology. 20 (5): 922. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp070.

External linksEdit