Writing about Indigenous people in past tense form. edit

It is not only inaccurate but also offensive to some Indigenous people, to talk/write about Indigenous people in past tense form as if they no longer exist. (unless of course, if they're extinct) This article speaks in one sentence in present tense then in the next sentence in past tense. This happens most in the "clan system" section and the one following it.

If the culture has changed in relatively recent times then it is more accurate to use the terms "Traditional Culture" and "Post-Colonization Culture" or "Modern Culture" than it is to simply speak of a people in past tense terms. NO IT IS NOT AN OFFENCE IT IS THE TRUTH OF GENOCIDE ALSO AGAINST VADUL ALAIS WHICH THEMSELVES COULD HAVE BEEN RED REFUGEES FROM THE CHARLES DE GAULLE ERA EXTERMINATION OF THE SURVIVING WOMEN KOK TURK PREHISTORIC OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Thank you to everyone that contributed to this article, it just needs tightened up a bit. SheaSandy (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC) THE ODUL MAY HAVE ALL DIED FIGHTING FOR THE FAMINE EMPEROR WITH HIS GIGANTIC FAMINE PENANCES FOR FORNICATION UPON HIS POPULATION WHICH NEEDED MARX TO RISE UP AGAINST HIM AND LATER EXECUTED HIM FOR HIS HOPE TO RETURN TO POWER THE ODUL PRINCESSES MAY HAVE DIED OF INTIMATE AGGRESSIVE VIOLATION AND OF DYSTOCIA DUE TO SIZE DIFFERENCES POSSIBLY THE CHURCH AS SURVIVING ATTEMPTED TO RESSURECT SOME However they may also have died of post-even forced conversion to Christianity conversion with marriage to larger men of Western race. The silent square of the official troops. However Errata Humana est and possibly these men did not know what could happen.Reply