Talk:Yugoslav Social-Democratic Party

Untitled

Link number 1 is dead. The year doesn't seem to be exact. In Trieste. Un'identità di frontiera di Angelo Ara and Claudio Magris, Torino: Enaudi 2007, 3rd edition, p. 71 the year 1898 is named. The party was founded, by the way, in Trieste. I would like to exchange these informations. Any objections? Berci (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yugoslav Social-Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080724203905/http://www.randburg.com/si/general/slo2.html to http://www.randburg.com/si/general/slo2.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080626144645/http://www.primorski.it:80/zgodovina/history2.html to http://www.primorski.it/zgodovina/history2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Ideology as "socialist" or "social democracy"

Someone reverted my edit changing their ideology like so. I would hold that in the context before 1914, before the fracturing of the Second International, Soc. Dem'cy would be a more precise term. At that time, it referred to Marxist parties, while socialism was a more general term. It's also, of course, the term they used in their own name. Nevertheless, both terms would be accurate and it's certainly not worth starting an edit war over, so I'll leave it as is. Nicknimh (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, to User:Vif12vf who made the reversion: please note that you also reverted a correction (relating to the units of AH) in the same edit distinct from the point you found objectionable. I have just put that back in myself, but in the future please take care on such things. Thanks. Nicknimh (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)