Talk:Yoix

infringement issue resolved

As the author of the original material, this article does not infringe my original material and may use it free and clear. An e-mail to that effect has been sent to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org --Jmocenigo (talk) 11:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

remarks

BovineOne is correct about the references. You may want to seek input from a third party, ideally with expertise in interpreted languages.--Lucent (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

John - While I find the page very informative, I'm qutie disappointed that Yoix has not been renamed "G" and am looking forward to the resolution of this problem soon before pursuing litigation. ```` - Gordon L. Wasserman

NPOV, notability, conflict of interest, advertising tone

This article was primarily written by one of the creators of Yoix, Jmocenigo. Please keep in mind that articles created on Wikipedia are editable by everyone and even an article's creator or primary contributor has no special editorial rights for vetting others' contributions.

While Yoix may be a good scripting language, no effort has been made to establish notability. Please provide examples of reputable industry sources citing its value as well as notable usage outside of demos created by its creators.

The article discusses no weaknesses or drawbacks to the scripting language and frames all its attributes in a favorable light to the point of taking on an advertising tone.

If notability cannot be established, deletion will be proposed. Since deleted articles are inaccessible, it is recommended that the creator of this article save a backup for later use when Yoix catches on and is able to show significant adoption. --Lucent (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

addressing concerns

The article has been reorganized and some text added in an attempt to address the concerns expressed. Notability hopefully comes two ways: firstly in being the product of a world-recognized research organization and, secondly, in being used as a key component in a critical application used by a multi-national corporation, which few new languages can claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmocenigo (talk • contribs) 02:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

There are no references to support either of those claims. please see WP:REF for details on how to properly cite sources for such claims. -- Bovineone (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yoix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080930194927/http://www.yoix.org:80/elements.html to http://www.yoix.org/elements.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080930070411/http://www.yoix.org:80/unicode.html to http://www.yoix.org/unicode.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)