An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the main page in the In the news section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 7 February 2019. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Done I have moved that sentence down to the personal life section and copyedited it, to avoid using the text from the Fellowship's website too closely. I have also retitled the "Biography" section as "Early life", as is custom with other biographies here. —C.Fred (talk) 16:44, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for approving and making the edit!
Please change the birth place to Winthrop, Massachusetts, U.S.
The birth place is listed incorrectly in the Infobox and under Early Life & Education. The reference is from the Rabbi's authorized biography. I can take a picture of the page if that helps. Thanks!
Teachtosing (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
I went ahead and changed the Rabbi's birth place to the correct location. I couldn't wait on the change as many online news sources were using the incorrect New York location which then caused further questions and confusion.
Teachtosing (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi User:Espresso Addict can you please clarify more here, why you feel the section is biased. it is basically sourced from NYT article. I feel the section looks ok, however I am not opposed to removing or copy editing few lines, if you feel strongly about it. regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Commented out the entire section since I am yet to hear back the issues, so as to pave way for ITN. --DBigXrayᗙ 19:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
(Sorry, I was out all day & evening.) There's no problem with sourcing from NY Times, but it's best to have several different sources -- independent of each other and of the subject -- for anything remotely controversial. Generally sections on criticism or controversy are to be avoided; it's best to integrate the material into the main flow of the article, presenting positive and negative views side by side. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
All right, I will keep this section commented out. --DBigXrayᗙ 05:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)