An old removed section edit

Copying here the text of a section that was removed from the article in October 2008. It was removed as unsourced, but my impression is that if one wanted to research local press, one probably could find sources for some or all of these facts and opinions. -- Vmenkov (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Controversy: Because of poor planning (the line was implemented on viaduct in the middle of the right of way of an unused railway line to reduce the construction/relocation cost) and an accelerated construction pace, ridership is now very low: 20,000 Trips/day instead of more than 500,000 planned. The main reasons are:

  • poor location not serving historical and commercial city center (an underground link would have probably been necessary),
  • competition with buses which parallel the Metro line at less than 400 m and whose prices are cheaper and stops are more closely spaced,
  • very poor accessibility caused by the viaduct which makes pedestrians cross wide, busy roads to get to the metro line and the lack of elevator access forcing a long walk up stairs to the platforms,
  • the absence of fare integration of the whole network as mass transit in Wuhan is managed by several operators (i.e. Metro and Buses) whose interests are sometimes far different,
  • the lack of real ridership planning
  • the political will to be the sixth or seventh city with a Metro in China, before Shenyang or other competitive cities.

All of this led to a costly, inefficient project that badly needs to be integrated with the rest of the transportation system by at least:

  • an integrated fare structure
  • the creation of feeder bus routes, and probably in the long term,
  • redesigning the central part of the line by the historic central city to make it more easily accessed and customer friendly.

File:Wuhan metro English map.png Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Wuhan metro English map.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply