Talk:William Beckford (novelist)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Valetude in topic Slave-ownership

Untitled edit

The link to John Farquhar has no relation to Beckford. Should the brackets - i.e. - the live link - be removed? teneriff 02:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Terminology edit

The term "profligate" is usually applied to sexual behavior, not to collection of paintings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maclennan123 (talkcontribs) 18:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

No it isn't. PiCo (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Indeed no. Johnbod (talk) 12:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

sold before the sale? edit

Fonthill, with part of his collection was sold before the sale for £330,000 to John Farquhar, who had made a fortune selling gunpowder in India.

I guess "before the sale" is a remnant of a former conception of the sentence? I'll look up the history later. —Tamfang (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on William Thomas Beckford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Slave-ownership edit

I can see that this is going to be a long debate on wiki.

British-owned plantations in Jamaica were all ‘slave-worked’, so the mention is redundant. You might as well add that it was malaria and typhoid ridden. Equally, to define Beckford in the lede as a ‘slave-owner’ is like classifying one of today’s better-off businessmen as a ‘yacht-owner’. It is simply not notable enough.

To retain credibility, I think the diversity/equality lobby should confine their mentions of slave-owning to those cases where it was an issue of special importance and interest in the career of that particular individual. Valetude (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)Reply