Talk:WiLL

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Renault C4V? edit

What is Renault C4V? Any source/info very welcome. zahn 08:44, 19 April 2007

 I think it's 4CV rather than C4V - I've changed it in my edit. AJHW 11:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Split the article into 3? edit

Why all this is collected in a SINGLE article? WiLL Vi, WiLL VS and WiLL Cypha are very different cars, with only word "WiLL" in common. Just look at japanese version (which is linked to) -- it has 3 DISTINCT articles.

So, I suggest to split this article into 3 -- maybe, with adding another article regarding "WiLL" concept (which isn't limited to cars in Japan). Bolkhov (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sounds a good idea to me too - I hadn't realised the WiLL idea didn't just relate to cars. We'll have to make sure the articles have enough detail in them to ensure each is kept! AJHW (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

No references edit

\it says that Renault and others took styling cues from these cars... nosources stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.218.132 (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WiLL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply