Talk:Washim

India: Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Citations? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is only one citation for that entire articles, that too is for census. usernamekiran (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Basim edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The disambiguation page Basim has an entry "Washim, an Indian city in the state of Maharashtra with Basim being an alternative name". Whilst the article Washim has a tag "Wikisource has the text of the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica article Basim", there is no indication at all in the article that Basim and Washim are the same place. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A bigger problem on this (Washim) page is that it has extensive copyvios. The Balaji mandir section, for example, is copied verbatim from the Maharashtra State Gazetteer, 1977. The same holds true for other random checks I made. Forget the dab page. Please first fix this page. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 18:05, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please see Violation suspected with 97.4% confidence. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 18:10, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic