Talk:Vanwall (Formula One team)

Formula One High‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Motorsport

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject British MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject British MotorsportBritish Motorsport articles

Motorsport

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As far as I know Chapman was an external consultant while Costin was working for Lotus... Ericd 20:48, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't there be some mention of Lucas' role in the Vanwall? Vandervall was very bitter at the agressive take-over of the family business CAV (Charles Anthony Vandevall) by Lucas. The Thinwall special and any other Vanwall vehicle made no use of any Lucas product - Very unusual given the pre-eminent position of the Lucas Competition's department.

2-litre engine edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Was this 86.1 × 85.6 mm as the text currently implies? (I'd tend to assume that it was actually 86 x 86, so that only the bore changed as the engine grew in size). 86.181.177.63 (talk) 14:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Type Numbers edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Vanwall never used type numbers. The cars were simply "Vanwalls". The numbers used in the results section are bogus, either being the year or referring to one specific chassis (i.e. "VW5"). This may be annoying for those who collect type numbers, but all Vandervell was interested in was winning and the only reason the cars had chassis numbers was that it was required for customs purposes. Ambak51 (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

So how do we distinguish them? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

We can't. Each individual chassis was rebuilt many times with different bodywork, mechanicals or chassis, according to development progress. Unlike almost every other constructor they didn't go for types, and inventing spurious data is not encyclopedic. Pyrop e 00:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moving page back to "Vanwall" edit

Latest comment: 26 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should this page be moved back to the article name "Vanwall"? ByKolles Racing lost the rights to the Vanwall name, so I feel like there's no reason to have distinction of the old Vanwall team. SteeledDock541 (talk) 02:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. This should never have been moved in the first place. The F1 team is the primary entity associated with the name Vanwall, and all these other rebranding hucksters are trying to gain credibility from it. Pyrop e 10:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic