Talk:Uyghur Latin alphabet

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 176.159.225.222 in topic ë and é
ÜL,

Name of this article edit

I doubt very much that the name of this article is useful to most readers of the Wikipedia. This should probably be merged within an article about Uighur writing systems in general, as it is a stub. -- Evertype· 15:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

ë and é edit

This article is currently titled Uyghur Latin Yëziqi and it uses ë anywhere that the word Yëziqi occurs, but in all other instances, the /e/ phoneme is written with é. The main English source we have, An Introduction to LSU, states that é was chosen over ë, and an uncited note in this article says that ë was previously used prior to 2008, when it was changed to é. Unless we can produce clearly better sources in Uyghur or Chinese, I would think that An Introduction to LSU should govern. I found a blog post on Sinoglot which expresses confusion about the use of ë. I found a message-board thread (on a site which is blacklisted by Wikipedia, so look for it at your own risk) titled "Ë ni É dep alayli(Jawaplar)", which looks like it is discussing the ë vs. é issue, but it's in Uyghur, which I can't read.

The upshot is that, unless someone comes up with some other evidence, I will suggest a move back to Uyghur Latin Yéziqi.—Greg Pandatshang (talk) 19:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agree, The main English source we have, An Introduction to LSU and the Uyghur Computer Science Association state Éé. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.159.225.222 (talk) 12:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uyghur Latin alphabet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uyghur Latin alphabet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply