Talk:Unit investment trust

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

---

Unit Investment Trust → Unit investment trust –

This should be completely uncontroversial. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 10:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

• Support as speedy/uncontroversial. The article was somewhat confused about what its topic was, so I looked at sources, fixed it, and cited one. The idea that this was the proper name of a US company was just a confusion that resulted from the editing history, it appears (this edit and this merge). Dicklyon (talk) 23:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
• Comment -- The article is not clear as to where this kind of security is offered and traded. Is this in the USA? In UK, we have Unit Trusts, which are managed and do not accord with the definition. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, my edits to the lead dropped the fact that in the US this type of fund is classified as an investment company; fixed. I don't know if this type exists in other countries, but it's not the same as the UK's unit trust. See the complicated history. Dicklyon (talk) 23:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

• Support. The term does not seem to be capitalized as a proper noun in most sources. Theoldsparkle (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Unit investment trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121018220342/https://www.spdrs.com/library-content/public/SPY%20Prospectus.pdf to https://www.spdrs.com/library-content/public/SPY%20Prospectus.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)